T0.1 - build the file map and verify the plan's line references

Wave 0 exists because the plan's line numbers came from a review of
users/directory-super-user rather than a fresh read. This is the fresh read:
7 pages, 6 stylesheets, 11,867 lines, with each page's stylesheets, scripts and
iframe role recorded, and all seven baseline counts captured with the command
that produced them.

Four discrepancies, one of which matters a great deal:

D2 - CLAUDE.md's "logged-override path for predecessors stays (A1). See
wp-creation-app.js:1962-1972" cites the wrong function. That range is
dashIssue(), which REFUSES to issue and says "open the package to release it
early with a logged reason". The reviewer read that sentence and correctly
inferred an override exists, but cited the mention rather than the code. The
audited path is confirmEarlyRelease() at 967-984 plus seven satellites (state
at 392, call sites at 998 and 1149, persisted at 1117, rendered at 1215,
rehydrated at 1674, reset at 481/488/1744). A T7.3 that preserved only
1962-1972 would delete the business rule while believing it had protected it.

D1 - "6 pages, 4 stylesheets" is 7 and 6; wave-0's own parenthetical lists
seven names. Every "all 6 pages" done-when is off by one.

D3 - four documents the plan reads from are deliverables not yet written.

D4 - the creator overflows horizontally at 1440px, which no F item covers.
Logged as BL-001 rather than fixed, since T7.1 rebuilds that layout anyway.
BL-002 records that outline:none appears three times in the wizard sheet, not
once, so T3.4 fixes all three.

Counts confirmed against the review: 79 dialogs (43 in the creator), 12 div and
2 span onclick, 15 help-tip badges, 0 aria-live, 0 pushState. The "4
declarations of #0f62fe" needed a definition - there are 31 occurrences and 14
custom-property declarations; the 4 is the number of stylesheets declaring
their own accent token, which is the number wave 9 should drive to 1.

No application code changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/waves/backlog.md

@@ -51,3 +51,31 @@ deliberately deferred.
 - **What:** whether the PDF export merges attachments into one package or lists them separately.
 - **Why not now:** product decision, raised in the `T9.1` PR.
 - **Suggested:** needs Nick.
+
+## Found during implementation
+
+### BL-001 — The creator overflows horizontally at 1440px
+
+- **Found during:** T0.2
+- **Where:** `html/wp-creation-index.html` / `html/wp-creation-styles.css`
+- **What:** the creator lays out 1,551px of content inside a 1,440px viewport, so the page
+  scrolls sideways at desk width. Measured by `tests/baseline_shots.py`, which compares
+  `documentElement.scrollWidth` against `clientWidth` at each capture. `F2` covers narrow
+  widths; no item covers this one. The other three overflowing pages (launcher 425px, SOP
+  wizard 429px, field view 432px, all at a 390px viewport) are `F2` and are already scheduled.
+- **Why not now:** wave 1 is scoped to `F1`–`F5`, and `T7.1` dissolves this page's iframe and
+  rebuilds its layout regardless — fixing it in wave 1 would be thrown away.
+- **Suggested wave or follow-up:** verify it is gone at `T7.1`; if it survives the rebuild,
+  it needs its own item in the next revision.
+
+### BL-002 — `outline: none` appears three times in the wizard sheet, not once
+
+- **Found during:** T0.1
+- **Where:** `html/work-package-suite-styles.css:325`, `:347`, `:501`
+- **What:** `A3`/`F5` cite the focus-ring removal at `322-328` only. The same
+  `outline:none` + pale 3px glow is repeated at `:347` (`.user-pick:focus`), and `:501`
+  (`.seq-step input.seq-label:focus`) removes the outline with **no** replacement at all,
+  which is a straight CLAUDE.md violation.
+- **Why not now:** it is in scope for `T3.4`, not a separate item — recorded so the task
+  fixes all three rather than the one the review cited.
+- **Suggested wave or follow-up:** fold into `T3.4`.