T9.1 - CR-008: the export, finally walked through
Every required field verified present under the Micron configuration: P6
Activity id and description, Priority, the Building/Floor/Sector location
row, Scope & Work, Material List, Constraints with their status carried by
WORDS (a black-and-white print keeps its meaning), Quality & Hold Points, and
the Drawings & Attachments index with per-file descriptions (T7.7's columns).
What must be absent, absent: the Micron samples now carry
fields:{costCode:false, acumaticaTask:false} - CR-002's two removals,
expressed as the toggles CLAUDE.md requires, in the creator sample AND the
wizard sample - so ACU Cost Code and Acumatica Task appear nowhere on the
Micron export while the columns, model and recorded values stay. CR-006-
suppressed sections (assets, kitting) are absent, as pinned since T5.7.
Tablet legibility, three real defects fixed:
- a bare `table { min-width:520px }` in the narrow-screen media block reached
the EXPORT tables too, dragging the whole document to 520px on a 390px
screen; scoped to .table-wrap (the form's scroll containers), because the
export must FIT a tablet, not scroll
- export tables now table-layout:fixed with overflow-wrap:anywhere
- at <=768px the doc sheds its 52/56px desk padding and neutralises the
inline column widths (the one legitimate !important: outranking an inline
style is its job)
RAISED, NOT DECIDED (the task says propose, do not assume) - merge versus
list for attachments: RECOMMEND MERGING image attachments into the printed
document (already done - they print inline as the sheet itself) and LISTING
PDFs as named, described links rather than merging them. Merging PDFs
server-side needs a PDF library dependency and re-renders every export for a
need the meeting expressed as "hand someone exactly the sheet" - which the
5MB single-sheet uploads plus inline images already serve. If merged-PDF
output is wanted anyway, it is a bounded server task - needs Nick.
Verification (each probe run alone): NEW tests/export_check.py 17/17.
Regressions: form_structure_check 50/51 (the standing F6 height question,
BL-022), sections_check 95/95.
Items: CR-008 (CR-002 field toggles applied to the samples)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -296,6 +296,12 @@ python tests/materials_check.py # D6 - material list, the CR-005 pattern
|
||||
python tests/mreq_check.py # CR-013 - lightweight request, end to end 19 checks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Wave 9 adds these:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python tests/export_check.py # CR-008 - the export, walked field by field 17 checks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Three probes were re-pointed at `T7.1`.** `sections_check.py` 5b drove the live
|
||||
cross-frame toggle hand-off, which no longer exists; it now pins the surviving path and
|
||||
the fact that an UNSAVED toggle correctly does not travel - a behaviour change, recorded
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user