main
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 290c9b078c |
T10.7 - a fake-OIDC-provider test seam, mirroring ldap_fake.py
Only two calls actually touch the network: Authlib's authorize_redirect and
authorize_access_token. server/okta_fake.py stands in for both, dispatched from
okta_auth._build_oauth() before the real Okta config is even considered, and
production-refusing the same way ldap_fake.is_active() does - a non-SQLite
DATABASE_URL means production, full stop, no matter what WP_OKTA_FAKE_DIRECTORY
says. Everything this app itself decides stays real: the ?next= open-redirect
guard, the disabled-account check, JIT provisioning, and which claim carries
identity all run unmodified in app.py's okta_login()/okta_callback().
The fake needed one thing ldap_fake.py never did: something to actually redirect
the browser to and back, since Okta's real flow leaves the site and LDAP's never
did. Two routes stand in for Okta's own sign-in screen - a plain picker listing
whatever WP_OKTA_FAKE_DIRECTORY defines, and a consent step that hands back an
authorization code (or an error) at okta_callback, exactly the shape a real Okta
redirect would carry. Both are registered in app.py only when the fake is active
at import time, so in production they do not exist at all, not merely refuse a
request - confirmed by starting the app with the env var unset and checking
app.routes directly.
tests/browser_check.py's start_server() takes an optional extra_env now (no
existing caller passes a third positional arg, so none of the ~40 files that
import it needed touching) and sets WP_OKTA_FAKE_DIRECTORY unconditionally,
same reasoning the LDAP predecessor used: almost nothing signs in (seed() mints
tokens directly), but the one check that does should not fail mysteriously.
tests/url_state_check.py scenario 2, SKIPPED since T10.4, is un-skipped and now
drives the real round trip: login.html's own button, the fake picker page, the
fake consent redirect, okta_callback(). Carries forward the LDAP predecessor's
own bug fix too - asserting the app actually LEFT login.html, not just that
wp-creation-index.html appears somewhere in the URL (which the ?next= parameter
alone would satisfy).
tests/okta_auth_check.py is new, mirroring ldap_auth_check.py's two-layer shape:
guards that need no server (the production refusal, single-use/replay on the
authorization code), then a real running app for sign-in itself - an existing
admin surviving unchanged, JIT provisioning at the lowest role, a disabled
account refused despite Okta approving it, an unsolicited callback hit refused
without a 500, a tampered state refused, a denied consent refused, an unknown
identity refused BY THE SERVER (not just absent from the picker), a same-site
next= surviving and an off-site one ignored, and OKTA_IDENTITY_CLAIM genuinely
working under a non-default claim name. 22/22.
One thing this could not verify in this environment: url_state_check.py and
browser_check.py both need a headless Edge/Chrome via cdp.py, and this sandbox
has neither installed and no way to install one (no sudo). Confirmed the failure
is the tests' own designed-for exit 2 ("no headless-capable browser found; set
WP_BROWSER"), not a crash, and separately confirmed start_server() itself boots
cleanly with the fake wired in - health check, the picker page rendering with
the seeded identities, login.html all responding correctly - so the only gap is
the DOM-level click-through, not the server-side mechanism url_state_check
exercises (which okta_auth_check.py covers directly via HTTP instead).
wave-10.md's T10.7 bullet records the shape of what got built and the 22/22
result.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 73da684b99 |
T10.4: remove the local password path entirely
Real deletion (D15's 'full replacement'), not a toggle. Okta is now the only credential this app accepts anywhere. Backend: - server/models.py: drop User.password_hash. - server/alembic/versions/1d60a608bb51_...: matching migration (op.drop_column, same plain-drop precedent as project_role/locked_until/etc.; downgrade re-adds it with server_default=''). - server/auth.py: remove hash_password/verify_password/password_problem/ MIN_PASSWORD_LEN/_COMMON_PASSWORDS, create_reset_token/decode_reset_token/ RESET_MINUTES, the bcrypt import. Roles/tokens/cookies/get_current_user untouched. - server/app.py: remove login(), the whole self-service reset-password block (forgot-password/reset-available/reset-password), and change_password() (POST /api/auth/password). Rework create_user() to drop the password field (with a docstring note: the username must exactly match the eventual Okta identity claim, or a later sign-in provisions a second account instead of matching this one). Remove admin_reset_password() outright - nothing left to reset. Fixes a bug this task's own predecessor left behind: okta_callback()'s JIT provisioning (T10.3) was still setting password_hash="", which would have raised TypeError the moment the column was actually dropped. Admin bootstrap (D16): server/manage_users.py moves from creating accounts (create/create-admin/reset-password, all password-based) to a single 'promote <username> --role <role>' command that changes the role on a row Okta's JIT provisioning already created - the documented path for naming the first admin. list/disable/enable unchanged. Frontend: html/users.js drops the password field and validation from createUser(), removes resetPw() and its button (nothing left to reset). html/users.html drops the #nu-password input, adds a tooltip on username explaining the exact-match-to-Okta requirement. html/auth-guard.js removes the wpChangePassword dialog; html/wp-sidenav.js removes the 'Password' menu item that opened it. Tests: tests/browser_check.py and tests/launcher_check.py stop hashing a password to seed fixture rows (and the --keep-server hint now prints a ready-to-use cookie-setting snippet instead of a dead username/password). tests/pipeline_check.py and tests/token_check.py drop an unused PW import. tests/console_dialogs_check.py: the admin password-reset dialog it drove no longer exists, so that scenario is removed - the prompt-with-validate() UI pattern it exercised is still covered via creator_dialogs_check.py's wp-creation-app.js call sites, noted in this file's docstring so the coverage move isn't silent. tests/url_state_check.py: the "next= survives a real sign-in via login" scenario is explicitly marked SKIPPED (not deleted, not faked) - that promise is specific to the login FORM this task removed and can't be honestly re-proven until T10.5 rebuilds it as an Okta redirect; a minted-token cookie now stands in as setup only, so scenarios 3-6 in that file still get a signed-in page to run against. server/smoketest.py and server/seed_demo.py: switched from POST /api/auth/login to minting a session the same way okta_callback() does (auth.create_token(), seeded into the cookie jar) rather than waiting on T10.7. This is a real operational change, documented in both files' own AUTHENTICATION sections: they now need to run where AUTH_SECRET_KEY and the database match the target server's (inside the api container, or local dev) - they can no longer sign in to an arbitrary remote URL from an unrelated workstation, because Okta requires a real browser and these are stdlib scripts. The account must already exist; neither script creates or promotes one. server/requirements.txt: bcrypt dropped, nothing imports it anymore. Verified: full Alembic chain (baseline through this migration) upgrades and downgrades cleanly against a throwaway SQLite DB. okta_callback() JIT provisioning re-tested against the post-migration schema (would have thrown before the password_hash="" fix above). create_user() verified via a live HTTP call with no password field. manage_users.py promote verified end to end (seed a JIT-shaped row at project_user, promote to admin, list). smoketest.py and seed_demo.py both run to completion against a live uvicorn instance using the new minted-session path - 25/25 checks, including logout actually invalidating the session (proving the cookie-jar seeding didn't just fake the sign-in, it preserved the real expiry mechanics). wave-10.md T10.4 / D15 / D16 |
|||
| b54034db04 |
T4.2 - S3: the app's state has an address; X1 is unblocked
Wave 0 counted pushState across html/ and found 0. Every page read its query
string once at boot and never wrote one again, so you could not send anyone a
link to WP07, a refresh dropped you back at the default view, and Back left the
app entirely because the app had never added a history entry.
CR-011 and CR-014 both promise an email carrying a direct link to a work package.
That is X1, and it was blocked on this. It is not blocked now.
html/wp-url.js is the whole mechanism, and it is deliberately NOT a router.
Nothing in it intercepts navigation or renders anything; it is the query string
treated as state that can be read, merged, written and subscribed to. Pages keep
their own rendering. Query parameters rather than a hash, because the server
already serves these paths and a hash is never sent to the server - which matters
the day a link has to be resolved before the page boots.
The merge behaviour is the part that earns its place: WPUrl.push({wp:id}) keeps
the active project, and WPUrl.push({wp:''}) clears one key without needing to know
what else is in the URL. Hand-built URLs losing ?project= is the usual way this
goes wrong.
WIRED: the creator (open package, dashboard view), the SOP wizard (tool, step),
the launcher (project). Each records a history entry only when the user chose the
change - restoring from the URL uses replace, or Back would immediately add an
entry and appear to do nothing.
WPUrl.absolute() is what CR-011/CR-014 will paste into an email in wave 8.
TWO BUGS THIS TASK CREATED AND FIXED, both found by the probe rather than by
reading:
- bootSOP() calls newPackage() during boot, and newPackage() cleared ?wp=. A
deep link therefore worked and then erased its own parameter, leaving Back
with nothing to return to. Now guarded on wpCreatorReady.
- goToStep() runs validateStep(), which ends in alert() when a required field
is empty - always true on a freshly loaded page. So restoring ?step=3 from a
shared link opened a modal dialog mid-boot, and hung the browser under CDP.
Restoring a view is not a forward navigation and no longer runs the
forward-navigation guard.
The second one is worth keeping in mind for the rest of wave 4: this app has 79
native dialogs, and any of them firing during a restore path will hang a headless
browser rather than fail visibly.
VERIFICATION. tests/url_state_check.py, 23 checks, all passing, covering every
done-when on the task:
- a URL identifying a work package opens that package
- the same URL for a SIGNED-OUT user goes to login, carries the target through
?next=, and lands on the work package itself after signing in
- refresh preserves project, package, tab and view
- Back and Forward move through states, verified as still-initialised rather
than reloaded, and with the dashboard actually rendered rather than only the
URL changed
- a different user opening the same URL reaches the same view
- nothing credential-shaped appears in the query string
Metric 8, pushState: was 0 at wave 0, now 2 in html/ (one pushState and one
replaceState, both in wp-url.js) behind 6 call sites across 4 files. The raw
count stays low by design - one place writes history, which is the same reason
the token work put one place in charge of colour.
browser_check 71/71, f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES, aggregates 16/16.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
