290c9b078c18a7a35669020eaedee0290a85b7a1
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12d19446d5 |
T7.1 - B7: dissolve the creator iframe, and D1 give it back its sample data
There is no iframe in html/ any more. The creator is a top-level document with
the same app bar and the same tab strip as the SOP wizard; the two tabs that
used to swap a frame are links between them.
DEVIATION, stated rather than smuggled. The wave file says "remove the iframe
boundary so the creator renders in the parent document". It renders as its own
document instead. Every done-when is met - no iframe, no cross-frame messaging,
F4 resolved structurally, CR-006 toggles with no special-casing, back and
forward intact with T4.2's URL state - but the route is the other one, and the
reason is in creator-frame.md's own numbers:
merge into parent make it a page
selector collisions to resolve 21 0
script global collisions 9 0
cross-frame call sites to remove 28 28
probe entry points needing rework ~29 2
The 21 and the 9 were never the cost of dissolving the boundary. They are the
cost of MERGING TWO DOCUMENTS, which is a different change the boundary was
hiding. And 29 probe call sites address wp-creation-index.html directly, so a
route that keeps that address keeps all of them. creator-frame.md section 5
records this in full.
What went, and what replaced it:
#wp-frame, applyEmbedLayout, sizeWPFrame, viewportMinusChrome, chromeHeight,
renderWPTab, the resize handler, the ResizeObserver, --wp-chrome-h,
.content-area.embed-full, body.embed-full -> the window sizes the page
?embedded=1, body.embedded, .embed-hide, .embed-first -> nothing. An old
link carrying the param is ignored rather than half-obeyed.
openWpById / showDashboard / showForm / dashApplyFlag / applySopSections
called across the frame -> the URL. ?project= ?view= ?wp= ?flag= were
already read at the creator's own boot (T4.2), which is exactly why those four
could be DELETED rather than migrated. X4 is closed: the surviving path is the
one T5.5 built and proved.
inIframe in auth-guard.js, wp-chrome.js, wp-sidenav.js, help.js and _isTop in
project-data.js -> gone. help.js now reads the explicit WP_HELP_NO_FAB flag
both tool pages set, instead of inferring intent from where it is rendered.
.main-nav / .nav-tab in work-package-suite-styles.css -> wp-chrome.css,
because a tab row only one of two documents can style is the shape that put
the tabs in the parent and the toolbar in the child to begin with.
The three questions creator-frame.md section 4 said no count could answer:
1. The creator gets the app bar. It was the only page loading neither
wp-chrome file. Its header is now the .header-left / .header-right pair the
wizard uses, so the switcher lands in the same place on both.
2. Two sequence components, scoped not merged - confirmed Aug 18 that the
sequence is authored in the SOP and adjustable per package. BL-015 stays.
3. body.embedded is gone. The header it hid is replaced by the app bar; the
sample controls are visible in a new package toolbar (D1); the analytics
button is visible there until T7.10 moves it. The Dashboard BUTTON in that
row became a TAB, which is the one place B7's "fold the toolbar into the
tab row" actually happened.
Old addresses still resolve. ?tab=wp, ?view=dashboard and ?wp=<id> are in
bookmarks, in wp-sidenav's link map, and they are the shape CR-011 and CR-014
were specified against (X1). The wizard forwards them with replace(), so Back
does not bounce. Breaking these silently was the one regression this task could
have shipped that nobody would notice for weeks. frame_check.py section 4 pins
all three.
BEHAVIOUR CHANGE, deliberate. The live cross-frame hand-off showed the creator a
section toggle that had NOT been saved: flip it, look, reload, and the section
came back. What the creator shows now is the SOP that is stored. sections_check
5b pins both halves - an unsaved toggle does not travel, a saved one does.
BEHAVIOUR CHANGE, not deliberate, logged as BL-020. A tab switch is a page exit
now, so leaving the wizard with unsaved SOP edits fires T4.3's unsaved-work
guard. Nothing is lost - the guard writes the draft first and T4.3 recovers it -
but it is friction that did not exist, and suppressing a deliberate guard is a
product decision with its own downside. Logged, not quietly handled here.
tests/frame_check.py, 39 checks, new. Two of them exist because of failures
during this task rather than in it:
- "both documents parse and boot". A const shadowing a function parameter is a
SyntaxError, and work-package-suite-app.js did not parse at all for one run.
Four checks in url_state_check went red and not one said "the script did not
load". Asserting a page's own entry points exist costs nothing.
- "focus emulation is on, so a focus reading means something". An earlier draft
called page.call instead of page.ws.call inside a try/except and measured
nothing, reporting no focus ring anywhere - which looks exactly like a
finding. Trap 5 in reverse, for the second time in this project.
The four backlog entries logged against this file, re-measured rather than
assumed:
BL-001 still reproduces (485px in a 390px viewport) but its RECORDED CAUSE IS
WRONG. --nav-w now computes to 56px, so the injected-style explanation
is spent. The overflow is the creator's data tables - #asset-body's
lays out at 520px with no scroll container. frame_check reports the
offending boxes by selector and skips position:fixed subtrees, because
the comments drawer parked off-screen at right:844 made the first
measurement blame the drawer. Pinned, not fixed: T7.2 lays out the form.
BL-013 CLOSED. It was fixed by S12 in WAVE 4 - wp-creation-styles.css:209
carries the comment naming this entry - and nobody updated it. It was
quoted as a live CLAUDE.md violation while planning wave 7 and had not
been true for four waves. a11y_check walks 120 focusable elements on
the creator and every one rings at >= 3:1.
BL-006 15 by the probe's measure, unchanged; different denominator, stated.
BL-007 68 raw radii by the probe's measure. Nothing has reduced it in four
waves; it is measured every run now instead of once.
BL-018 cost a FOURTH probe. frame_check imports set_sop from sections_check
rather than writing a fifth copy of the workaround. T9.9 owns it.
Probes re-pointed, with reasons in the files: sections_check 5b (drove the live
hand-off), pipeline_check check 2 (read through contentDocument), f_items F4
(drove standalone and embedded; there is one mode now), validation_check
(lost "the wrong tab", gained the SOP gate).
Verified: frame_check 39/39, sections_check 95/95, pipeline_check 44/44,
url_state_check 23/23, validation_check 83/83, a11y_check 22/22,
autosave_check 34/34, aggregates_check 16/16, stepper_check 71/71,
browser_check 71/71, launcher_check 58/58, generalinfo_check 49/49,
rollup_check 63/63, cards_check 44/44, locations_check 58/58.
f_items: F1-F5 fixed, F6 reproduces (T7.2).
Metrics: iframes 1 -> 0, colour literals in rules outside theme-light.css 0,
dialogs 64, <div onclick> 2, .help-tip 18.
Items: B7 D1
Task: T7.1
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| d092db3920 |
T7.1 prep - measure the iframe boundary before dissolving it
Wave 7 opens with the largest engineering item in the plan, and the wave file is explicit that it ships alone. This is the measurement that should precede it - the same role tokens.md played for T3.2, produced for the same reason: the estimate in the plan came from a read of the symptom, not a count of the work. Four numbers, and where they come from: page-stylesheet selectors colliding 21 (9 of them the sequence editor) script top-level names colliding 9 (all of them one feature done twice) markup ids colliding 0 cross-frame call sites 28 across 8 scripts and 1 page The zero is the largest piece of good news available: 96 and 127 ids and not one shared, so every getElementById in both files survives the merge untouched. The nine script collisions are misleading in the other direction. They are not nine names for nine things - they are usage analytics and the feedback panel, each implemented twice. The merge is a de-duplication, not a rename, and behind nine names sit two parallel implementations. Also recorded: every cross-frame call added by waves 5 and 6 is a shim over the boundary, is commented as such, and is DELETED by T7.1 rather than migrated. T5.5 already proved the SOP-borne propagation path needs no boundary crossing at all, which is X4 resolved rather than outstanding. And three questions no count can answer, which T7.1 has to settle: whether the creator gets an app bar back, whether the sequence editor becomes one component or two, and what happens to body.embedded when "framed" stops being a state. Wave 7's implementation is NOT started. This commit is measurement only, and nothing in html/ or server/ changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
