5e1f6e75ba25090d52843117d9480fe8a1c4192a
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5f3141e2a3 |
T1.5 - F5 (interim): wizard fields stop looking disabled
INTERIM. T3.4 removes the duplicate token underneath this; the job here is only the appearance, and no token consolidation is started. The wizard filled its inputs with var(--bg) - which in this sheet is the PAGE BACKGROUND, #f4f4f4 - on a #e0e0e0 border. An empty required field was indistinguishable from a locked one, which is why people were not typing in them. The cause is the one the review named: this sheet redeclares its own tokens, so it never saw --cds-field: #ffffff, even though theme-light.css has been supplying that to this page all along. Fields now consume --cds-field, and take the same --border-strong the creator's inputs already use, so a field looks like a field on both pages. No new value is introduced - both tokens already existed. That inverts a signal if left there, so it needed the other half: there was no disabled rule at all on this page, meaning locked fields would have turned white too. Disabled and readonly fields now take --cds-field-02, the theme's own secondary field surface, matching .locked-field in the creator. Enabled #ffffff against disabled #f4f4f4, verified by computed style rather than by eye. The border is deliberately the same on both states. I first wrote `border-color: var(--border)` on the disabled rule and could not demonstrate it taking effect - the rule matches, is more specific than the base rule, and its background applies, but the computed border stayed --border-strong. Rather than ship a declaration whose effect I cannot show, it is gone: a consistent border is what "consistent with inputs elsewhere" asks for, and the fill is what carries the state. Screenshot diff is limited to the wizard, but establishing that took a control run. admin and users appeared to change too, until capturing twice with NO code change showed they differ from themselves - the console pages render live timestamps and are not byte-stable. login, launcher, sop, creator and field are. Recorded in the baseline README so the next task with a "no layout change" done-when does not chase it. The F5 probe now also fails if enabled and disabled fields become identical, which is the way this fix could silently go wrong. f_items: F1-F5 FIXED, F6 untouched as wave 1 requires. browser_check 71/71. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 4d3258113a |
T1.4 - F4: the comments drawer opens below the header, not under it
Containing block first, as the task asks. The drawer is a body child with no
transformed ancestor, so its containing block was already the viewport - the
positioning context was never wrong. What was wrong was `top: 0` with
`height: 100vh`: the drawer started at the very top of the viewport, and the
creator's .header is sticky with z-index:100 against the drawer's 61. The
header won, so the drawer's own head - its title and its close button - was
roofed over and unreachable. It read as "off-screen" because the part you
needed was covered, not because the box had escaped the viewport.
That is why raising z-index would have been the wrong move: it does not remove
the collision, it just swaps which element is on top, and then the drawer
covers the header instead. The fix is to stop them occupying the same band.
The drawer now starts at var(--rail-top) and is that much shorter. --rail-top
is the header's measured height, set by wp-creation-app.js:1328 and already
used by .wp-nav for exactly this purpose, so "below the header" has one
definition on this page rather than two.
The iframe boundary is NOT implicated. position:fixed inside the embedded
creator resolves against the iframe's own viewport, which is self-consistent,
and the drawer behaves identically framed and unframed. T7.1 can dissolve the
boundary without revisiting this.
The probe was checking one width, one mode, and placement only. It now checks
390 and 1440, standalone and embedded, that the close button is genuinely
hit-testable via elementFromPoint rather than merely present, that the drawer
reopens after closing, and that opening it does not move the page's scroll
position. All pass.
One honest caveat, attributed rather than hidden. At 390px the drawer sits at
the right edge of a 485px layout viewport while the screen is 390px, so 95px of
it is off-screen. That is not the drawer: the creator forces its containing
block to 485px, and while chasing it I found BL-001's root cause -
wp-creation-app.js:1389 injects `body{--nav-w:288px}` with no media query,
which lands after wp-creation-styles.css:815's
`@media (max-width:860px){body{--nav-w:56px}}` and overrides it, so the page
reserves 288px of rail that is not there at any width. Every `right: 0` fixed
element on the page is displaced by it, not only this one.
Left unfixed on purpose - it is the creator's layout, T7.1 rebuilds it, and
CLAUDE.md is explicit about not fixing things noticed in passing. BL-001 now
carries the exact cause and the five rules that consume the token, so T7.1 does
not have to find it again. The probe reports it as an attributed note naming
BL-001, so nobody is sent to the wrong file.
browser_check 71/71. f_items: F1, F2, F3, F4 FIXED.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| d9f96f20e1 |
T1.3 - F3: give the SOP header's groups a defined relationship
.header-left and the injected chrome were in a dead tie. Both were
`flex: 1 1 auto` with `min-width: 0`, so both claimed the same run of the bar
and both were allowed to shrink to nothing. The chrome's content is wider, so
it won every time: .header-left computed to clientWidth 0 while its
flex-shrink:0 logo kept its 106px and overflowed underneath the project
switcher. With the real project name that meant "2667008" rendered on top of
the PRIME wordmark and the name itself clipped to "on EUV Cleanroom En...".
The bar now has an order of giving way rather than a tie:
.header-left flex: 0 1 auto, min-width: auto sizes to content, floors at
the logo plus the gap
.wp-chrome flex: 1 1 auto (unchanged) the only one that grows
.header-right flex: 0 0 auto keeps its buttons
min-width:auto restores the content-based floor the explicit `min-width: 0` had
removed. The inner title block keeps its own min-width:0, so the project name
still gives way first, through the ellipsis .header-subtitle already carries -
truncation policy stays B2's, and nothing here silently truncates.
Two things the review did not name were colliding on the same bar and are fixed
with it. .header-right was being squeezed below its buttons, so "Load Sample"
ran underneath "Feedback". And the header was a fixed 48px holding FOUR groups,
not two - the markup's two plus what wp-chrome.js and auth-guard.js inject - so
at 1024px the overflow had nowhere to go but on top of its neighbours, and
T1.2's user-menu wrap turned that into three rows spilling onto the tab row
below. min-height plus flex-wrap lets the bar grow instead.
Header height at 1440px with a normal project name is still exactly 48px, so
desk layout is unchanged; sop-1440 differs from the wave 0 baseline only
because T1.1 gave the switcher a name to show in place of "(unnamed)". With the
long name it grows to 62px at 1440 and 82px at 1024 - wrapping rather than
overlapping, which is the point.
The F3 probe was too narrow to have caught the right-hand collisions: it
compared the logo against the chrome and nothing else. It now checks every pair
of groups sharing the bar, plus anything spilling out of it, and still reports
FIXED at 390, 768, 1024 and 1440 with the long name.
Verified at all four widths with "Micron EUV Cleanroom Enable 2667008": no
overlapping pair, nothing spilling, logo fully visible.
browser_check 71/71. f_items: F1, F2, F3 FIXED.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| fe8a27e022 |
T0.2 - baseline captured; all six rendering defects confirmed present
Runs the app from a clean database, captures the before images, and records which of F1-F6 actually still reproduce. All six do. Rather than eyeball screenshots, each defect is measured in a browser by tests/f_items.py, which reports REPRODUCES / FIXED / INCONCLUSIVE and never a silent pass. That makes it both the wave 0 record and the wave 1-3 regression check: an item is done when its probe flips to FIXED. F1 hero says "Job A", app bar still says "Select a project", no reload F2 "Sign out" spans x382-432 in a 390px viewport - cut in half, 3 rows F3 chrome paints over the logo by 106x32px; .header-left collapses to 0 F4 comments drawer overlaps the header by 380x91px in the standalone creator F5 5 of 5 ENABLED wizard inputs compute #f4f4f4 on #e0e0e0 F6 11 cards in one 5,017px scroll, 0 tabs (review said ~4,700px; it grew) Three probes needed care to avoid reporting a false pass, and the traps are worth knowing before anyone verifies a fix: F1 disappears if localStorage is primed first, because then both sources of truth agree. The probe clears it and drives the real picker. F3 needs a long project name that is long IN THE DATABASE - any page reached with ?project= re-pulls it and overwrites a locally-faked one. It also cannot be measured by comparing .header-left to the chrome: under the long name .header-left (flex:1, min-width:0) collapses to clientWidth 0, so that comparison reports a tidy zero gap while the chrome paints across the logo. It measures against .logo, which is flex-shrink:0. My first two attempts at this probe both reported FIXED for those reasons; the screenshot did not. F5 must ignore genuinely disabled inputs or a fix looks done while real fields stay grey. 14 screenshots, not the 12 the plan asks for, because there are 7 pages (file-map D1). Capture also measures horizontal overflow, which is how BL-001 was found. Tooling: cdp.py gains viewport() and screenshot() - it could do neither, and T0.2 requires 390px and 1440px images. 390px sets the mobile flag rather than just narrowing the window, since every page declares width=device-width and Chrome otherwise lays out at 980px and no media query under test fires. Both new scripts reuse browser_check.py's seed() and start_server() instead of growing a second fixture. Existing browser_check still passes 71/71. No application code changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
