The deliberate mobile pass the original proposal never had. Driven page by
page at 390px with mobile emulation (the media queries under test actually
fire) by NEW tests/mobile_check.py, 24/24:
- no page scrolls sideways - all seven (the creator joined at T9.5 when
BL-001 died)
- no visible control is clipped past the viewport (the probe learned
frame_check's two lessons: an off-canvas drawer is PARKED, not clipped,
and a row inside an overflow-x container is scrollable)
- tap targets: the shared coarse-pointer block in wp-chrome.css puts every
button, input, select, nav link and appbar control at a 44px minimum on
phone widths and coarse pointers; checkboxes, radios and help-tip badges
get the 24px WCAG floor with spacing doing the rest. Field View - the
gloved-hands surface - measures 44px on EVERY control. Inline text links
are exempt per WCAG 2.5.8's own exception. Even the deliberately
unobtrusive dev toggle grew to the floor: subtle by opacity, not by size.
- CR-007 attachments offline at 390px and T8.5 requests at 390px were already
pinned by files_check and mreq_check; this pass cites rather than repeats.
After-screenshots for all seven pages at 390px are committed in
docs/reference/baseline/after-wave9, beside the wave 0 set, captured by the
same baseline_shots.py fixture.
Verification (each probe run alone): NEW tests/mobile_check.py 24/24.
Regressions: form_structure_check 50/51 (BL-022's standing question),
files_check 36/36.
Items: C2
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
INTERIM. T3.4 removes the duplicate token underneath this; the job here is only
the appearance, and no token consolidation is started.
The wizard filled its inputs with var(--bg) - which in this sheet is the PAGE
BACKGROUND, #f4f4f4 - on a #e0e0e0 border. An empty required field was
indistinguishable from a locked one, which is why people were not typing in
them. The cause is the one the review named: this sheet redeclares its own
tokens, so it never saw --cds-field: #ffffff, even though theme-light.css has
been supplying that to this page all along.
Fields now consume --cds-field, and take the same --border-strong the creator's
inputs already use, so a field looks like a field on both pages. No new value is
introduced - both tokens already existed.
That inverts a signal if left there, so it needed the other half: there was no
disabled rule at all on this page, meaning locked fields would have turned white
too. Disabled and readonly fields now take --cds-field-02, the theme's own
secondary field surface, matching .locked-field in the creator. Enabled #ffffff
against disabled #f4f4f4, verified by computed style rather than by eye.
The border is deliberately the same on both states. I first wrote
`border-color: var(--border)` on the disabled rule and could not demonstrate it
taking effect - the rule matches, is more specific than the base rule, and its
background applies, but the computed border stayed --border-strong. Rather than
ship a declaration whose effect I cannot show, it is gone: a consistent border
is what "consistent with inputs elsewhere" asks for, and the fill is what
carries the state.
Screenshot diff is limited to the wizard, but establishing that took a control
run. admin and users appeared to change too, until capturing twice with NO code
change showed they differ from themselves - the console pages render live
timestamps and are not byte-stable. login, launcher, sop, creator and field are.
Recorded in the baseline README so the next task with a "no layout change"
done-when does not chase it.
The F5 probe now also fails if enabled and disabled fields become identical,
which is the way this fix could silently go wrong.
f_items: F1-F5 FIXED, F6 untouched as wave 1 requires. browser_check 71/71.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Runs the app from a clean database, captures the before images, and records
which of F1-F6 actually still reproduce. All six do.
Rather than eyeball screenshots, each defect is measured in a browser by
tests/f_items.py, which reports REPRODUCES / FIXED / INCONCLUSIVE and never a
silent pass. That makes it both the wave 0 record and the wave 1-3 regression
check: an item is done when its probe flips to FIXED.
F1 hero says "Job A", app bar still says "Select a project", no reload
F2 "Sign out" spans x382-432 in a 390px viewport - cut in half, 3 rows
F3 chrome paints over the logo by 106x32px; .header-left collapses to 0
F4 comments drawer overlaps the header by 380x91px in the standalone creator
F5 5 of 5 ENABLED wizard inputs compute #f4f4f4 on #e0e0e0
F6 11 cards in one 5,017px scroll, 0 tabs (review said ~4,700px; it grew)
Three probes needed care to avoid reporting a false pass, and the traps are
worth knowing before anyone verifies a fix:
F1 disappears if localStorage is primed first, because then both sources of
truth agree. The probe clears it and drives the real picker.
F3 needs a long project name that is long IN THE DATABASE - any page reached
with ?project= re-pulls it and overwrites a locally-faked one. It also cannot
be measured by comparing .header-left to the chrome: under the long name
.header-left (flex:1, min-width:0) collapses to clientWidth 0, so that
comparison reports a tidy zero gap while the chrome paints across the logo.
It measures against .logo, which is flex-shrink:0. My first two attempts at
this probe both reported FIXED for those reasons; the screenshot did not.
F5 must ignore genuinely disabled inputs or a fix looks done while real
fields stay grey.
14 screenshots, not the 12 the plan asks for, because there are 7 pages
(file-map D1). Capture also measures horizontal overflow, which is how BL-001
was found.
Tooling: cdp.py gains viewport() and screenshot() - it could do neither, and
T0.2 requires 390px and 1440px images. 390px sets the mobile flag rather than
just narrowing the window, since every page declares width=device-width and
Chrome otherwise lays out at 980px and no media query under test fires. Both
new scripts reuse browser_check.py's seed() and start_server() instead of
growing a second fixture. Existing browser_check still passes 71/71.
No application code changed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
