7e33a3cbfda37dad7ca16563c075d429127a8a03
23 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7e33a3cbfd |
Wave 6 exit - the work package's general information
Five tasks, three probes, 156 new checks. Every wave-6 item persists, exports
and filters, and the rollup adds up at every level rather than only at the leaf.
Each task had one decision it had to make rather than inherit, and each is
recorded in wave-6.md because a later reader will otherwise read the behaviour
as an accident:
T6.1 blanks sort LAST in both directions
T6.2 priority sorts by escalation, not alphabetically
T6.3 the stored value is the full path, not the node's own code
T6.4 the unassigned group is shown, or the totals do not reconcile
T6.5 a card has three states, so it needs three status lines
admin.js is byte-identical. A7's note about localization is the loudest "do not"
in the wave file and cards_check proves it two ways.
Screenshots re-captured at 390 and 1440 across all seven pages. One overflow,
the known creator@390 (BL-001), unchanged.
Carried forward unchanged: BL-010 (829 spacing/type literals - wave 6 re-laid-out
none of the pages carrying them), BL-018, BL-019. BL-018 has now cost three
separate probes a hand-seeded SOP; browser_check's fixture should adopt the
production {sop, state} shape when it is fixed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 7893a56ea2 |
Wave 5 exit - record what shipped and where the counts landed
First field-visible wave. Waves 1-4 moved almost nothing on screen; every page in this one looks different. Baseline counts, against wave 0 <div onclick> 12 -> 2 (T5.1 took exactly ten) native dialogs app-wide 79 -> 64 (T5.1 2, T5.2 1, T5.8 13) ...in the SOP wizard 14 -> 0 ...in the creator 43 -> 43 wave 7's colour literals outside theme-light.css 0 -> 0, held SOP wizard steps 10 -> 12 (T5.4 Locations, T5.5 Sections) Six probes now cover this wave, 399 checks between them, each written because its task's done-when could not be checked by anything that already existed. Screenshots re-captured at 390 and 1440 across all seven pages. One overflow, the known creator@390 (BL-001), unchanged. The two beforeunload log lines on sop@1440 and creator@1440 are present at wave 4 too - captured both sides during T5.1 rather than assuming. BL-010 is honestly unchanged: every rule wave 5 added consumes --wp-s*, and none of the 829 pre-existing spacing/type/radius literals were converted, because none of the pages carrying them were re-laid-out here. T7.1 still owns it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 55caefb099 |
T5.8 - S1 (wizard): errors at the field, and the last dialog is gone
S1 has two halves and they are easy to conflate.
One is that validation was a native dialog: "Please complete all required
fields: Project Name, Number, Client, Division, and Site Location." names five
fields at once, highlights none of them, and scrolls nowhere. The other is that
validateStep guarded steps 1, 5 and 6 while the MARKUP marks required fields on
1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 - so two steps' asterisks meant nothing at all, which is worse
than no asterisk.
Both fixed, and the second is the one worth measuring: the probe reads the
required-field list out of work-package-suite.html rather than out of STEP_GATES,
because a probe that read the table would agree with whatever the table says and
prove nothing. Both notations count - an asterisk in a <label>, and the red span
beside step 3's role titles.
Now: an error per FIELD, rendered at it, associated by aria-describedby, marked
aria-invalid, announced through role="alert", and the first one focused and
scrolled into view. The error boxes are BUILT from the gate table rather than
written into the markup twelve times - adding a required field is one row, and
its error element, its association and its announcement all follow. A
markup-side error box somebody forgets to add is an error nobody ever sees.
An error clears as you type rather than on the next submit. An error still
showing over a field you have just corrected teaches people to ignore errors.
And nothing paints a step you have not tried to leave: the rail asks
stepGateMet(), which reads the same fields and marks none of them.
The thirteen dialogs
Every one is now the thing it should have been - an error at the field it is
about, or an announcement in a live region with the role T4.5 established:
errors interrupt, confirmations do not.
A dialog is not merely ugly. It blocks the page, cannot be placed or styled, a
screen reader can present it only as a modal interruption, and it is one OK
button whatever it says - so "sample data loaded" and "you cannot do that"
arrived identically.
Two deserve naming. The empty-comment alert became an inline error on the
feedback textarea. And showAnalytics() was a confirm() carrying the entire
usage summary as its body - a wall of text in a dialog whose only dismissal
was also the download button. The summary is the useful part, so it is shown,
with the download offered as an action beside it. That function has no caller
in the wizard's markup (the "Usage data" button is the creator's, calling the
creator's own showAnalytics), and it was converted rather than deleted:
deleting a feature is not what this task was asked to do, and its dialog
counted toward the number this task has to drive to zero.
html/work-package-suite.html #wp-toast, an error box on the textarea
html/work-package-suite-app.js STEP_GATES widened; per-field messages;
ensureErrorBoxes; wizardToast; 13 removals
html/work-package-suite-styles.css .wp-toast
tests/validation_check.py new - 81 checks
tests/stepper_check.py its "the alert T5.8 still owns" check now
asserts the opposite, by name
Done when
[x] every step with required fields validates them - 5 steps, from the markup
[x] each error renders at its field and is associated via aria-describedby
[x] submitting an invalid step focuses AND scrolls to the first error
(scroll checked by bounding box, not by trusting scrollIntoView)
[x] errors announce to screen readers
[x] the wizard's native dialog count is 0
The count, recorded both ways because BL-017 says the metric counts prose
work-package-suite-app.js 0 raw, 0 with comments stripped
app-wide 64 raw, 64 stripped, against wave 0's 79
wp-creation-app.js 43 (wave 7), users.js 10 and
admin.js 6 and index.html 5 (wave 9)
The wizard contributes none of what is left, which the probe asserts rather
than leaving to the total.
Verified one at a time
validation_check 81/81 new
stepper_check 71/71
sections_check 88/88
browser_check 71/71
a11y 22/22
url_state 23/23
autosave 34/34
locations 58/58
aggregates 16/16
pipeline 43/43
launcher 58/58
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
No colour literal added. The toast says "error" by a red rule AND by staying
until dismissed where a confirmation times out - two channels, not one (C1).
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: step 3's two role TITLES are validated
because the markup marks them required, but the two role NAME pickers beside
them are not marked and so are not gated. A sign-off role with nobody in it is
arguably the more useful thing to catch. The markup is what was built to; if the
intent was the names, that is two rows in STEP_GATES.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| c453e50412 |
T5.6 - CR-002: Acumatica cost code and task, hidden by toggle
The team concluded these two are noise on a field work package: cost codes are
effectively constant on a job and the Acumatica task mapping is a PM concern.
The cost visibility they actually want is by building and floor, which is CR-004
and CR-018.
Hidden, not removed. CLAUDE.md: "Removed fields are hidden, not deleted (CR-002,
CR-016). Retain the data and the model." So this is a second, narrower toggle
list beside T5.5's sections - two fields inside General Information rather than
two more sections, because a section is a block of the document and these are
two rows in one.
no migration the values live in the work package's JSON data blob,
which nothing here writes to. The probe greps every
migration for a drop_column touching either.
no model change server/models.py is untouched by this task
no code change to the toggles are SOP data. Another project turns them
re-enable back on from step 12 and both fields return, values
included
A field is on only if its own toggle is on AND the section holding it is. Asked
as one question (WPSections.fieldOn) so no caller has to remember to ask both -
a field showing inside a hidden section is not a state worth reasoning about,
and the probe checks that case explicitly.
html/wp-sections.js FIELDS, fieldOn, normalizeFields
html/work-package-suite-app.js field rows nested under their section
html/work-package-suite-styles.css .field-toggle
html/wp-creation-index.html ids on the two .field wrappers
html/wp-creation-app.js WP_FIELD_NODES; both document rows conditional
tests/sections_check.py +22 checks (53 -> 75)
Done when
[x] neither field appears in the form, detail view or PDF export when off
[x] existing records still hold their values - a package EDITED while both are
off comes back through collectPackage() with both intact
[x] the fields can be re-enabled for another SOP without a code change
[x] no schema migration drops data - checked against every migration in the
tree, not just the ones this wave added
The whole .field wrapper is hidden, not the input: a bare label over nothing is
worse than either state.
Raised, not fixed
BL-019 A cost code that has left COST_CODES is silently blanked on edit.
wp_cost is a <select>, and setting .value to something with no matching
<option> does nothing at all - so opening such a package clears the
field and the next save writes the blank back. The same bug was fixed
once already for gov_wosize (work-package-suite-app.js:490-495) by
adding the stored value as an option; cost code never got it.
Found the honest way: a probe here used an invented cost code to prove
hiding a field does not delete its value, and the value came back
empty. That looked exactly like the toggle eating data. It was not, and
the probe now uses a real code and says why in a comment - a probe that
fails for a reason other than the one it names is worse than no probe.
Verified one at a time
sections_check 75/75 (53 + 22 for CR-002)
browser_check 71/71
stepper_check 70/70
a11y 22/22
url_state 23/23
autosave 34/34
locations_check 58/58
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: BL-000b asks whether General Information
wants per-field toggles generally. This is not that - it is the two fields
CR-002 names, and the list is deliberately closed. If a third field wants one,
that is the general question and it needs the product answer BL-000b is holding.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| ae30c58337 |
T5.5 - CR-006: section toggles, and X4 resolved rather than deferred
X4 first, because the brief asks for it explicitly.
IMPLEMENTATION.md sequences CR-006 after B7 on the grounds that the toggles must
suppress sections inside the creator, which is an iframe child until T7.1. The
wave file puts it in wave 5 anyway, and its last done-when is written to
accommodate exactly that: "toggle state propagates into the creator, OR the PR
documents exactly where it does not and why".
It propagates. Both ways, by two separate paths, because they fail differently:
ON THE CREATOR'S OWN BOOT the flags ride on the SOP, which the creator already
reads - ProjectData.pullProject hydrates it from the server. Nothing crosses
the frame boundary at all, so this path is unaffected by B7 either way. It
covers a reload, a fresh tab, the standalone creator page, and a colleague
opening the project on another machine.
WHILE THE FRAME IS OPEN the wizard hands the change straight across
(pushSectionsToCreator -> cw.applySopSections), the same shape T5.3 used for
the dashboard filter. Without it, flipping a toggle would appear to do nothing
until a reload.
T7.1 removes the second path, not the first. That is the whole of the X4
exposure and it is one function, commented as such. Building CR-006 after B7
would not have made the SOP-borne path any different; it would only have saved
writing the hand-off.
What it does
Ten sections, one shared list (html/wp-sections.js) read by the wizard, the
creator's form and the creator's rendered document. Three surfaces meant three
chances to drift, which is how "Assets is off, except in the export" happens.
Off means NOT RENDERED - form, detail view and PDF export. It never means
deleted. renderPackage() was rebuilt from one long string into a list of
(section, html) blocks so a suppressed section leaves no empty heading and the
survivors renumber 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 instead of leaving a hole. The print window
reuses that same HTML, so the export needed no separate change.
Absent means ON. A SOP saved before today mentions no sections, and reading
that as "all off" would blank every project in the estate the moment this
shipped. WPSections.normalize is the one place that decision lives.
html/wp-sections.js new - the shared list, defaults, normalize
html/work-package-suite.html step 12, a 12th rail button
html/work-package-suite-app.js the toggles, state.sections, the hand-off
html/work-package-suite-styles.css the toggle rows
html/wp-creation-index.html stable ids on the five unnamed cards
html/wp-creation-app.js WP_SECTION_NODES, applySopSections,
renderPackage rebuilt as blocks
tests/sections_check.py new - 53 checks
Done when
[x] all 10 sections are toggleable - each one driven off and back on
[x] a section toggled off is absent from the form, the detail view and the
PDF export - checked by content marker, not by heading, so "the section
is gone" and "the section was empty" cannot be confused
[x] toggling off then on restores prior data with no loss - and the sharper
version: a package EDITED while Assets is off still carries its assets
through collectPackage(), which is what Save uses
[x] new SOPs default to all sections on
[x] toggle state propagates into the creator - both paths, separately
Two things worth arguing with
General Information is toggleable, because CR-006 enumerates it. Turning it
off leaves nothing to identify a package by. The row says so in its own note
rather than being quietly excluded from the list.
Location has no card of its own - it is a field inside General Information's
grid, and its toggle governs that one row. CR-004 gives it structured
building/floor/sector fields in wave 6, at which point one line of
WP_SECTION_NODES changes. Written down because "the toggle does nothing" and
"the toggle governs one row" look identical from outside.
Approvals & Sign-offs is NOT toggleable and is not one of the ten. A package
nobody signed is not a shorter package.
Verified one at a time
sections_check 53/53 new
stepper_check 70/70 (STEP_COUNT 11 -> 12)
locations_check 58/58 (its "step 11 is last" check now asserts the thing that
is actually invariant - the wizard's navigation follows)
browser_check 71/71
a11y 22/22
url_state 23/23
autosave 34/34
aggregates 16/16
pipeline 43/43
launcher 58/58
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
No colour literal added: still 0 across all page sheets and inline blocks. Each
toggle says its state three ways - the checkbox, the words "In use" / "Not used",
and the rule down its left edge (C1).
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: the toggles are SOP-wide, so a project
cannot use Kitting on install packages and not on BIM ones. BL-000b already
records the field-level version of this question; the per-WP-type version is the
same shape and is not recorded anywhere yet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 2081c1ad3c |
T5.4 - CR-005: a per-project location taxonomy, stored as codes
CLAUDE.md lists CR-005 among the change requests that get "silently half-built if
you treat them as frontend-only". This is the server half and the wizard half
together: a new table, four routes, an Alembic revision, and step 11.
CODES, NOT DISPLAY STRINGS, because CR-018 rolls cost up by these values and a
rollup keyed on a label breaks the day somebody fixes a typo in it. Two columns
carry that: `code` is a node's own slug, derived once at import and never
recomputed; `path` is the full slug path, unique per project, and is what a work
package will store. Renaming a value changes `name` alone - the probe renames a
floor and demands its path comes back byte-identical, with its children's paths
intact.
DEACTIVATE, NEVER DELETE. There is no DELETE route, and the probe checks for its
absence (405) rather than trusting that nobody added one. Deactivating hides a
value from new work packages and cascades DOWN, because a floor nobody can pick
must not keep offering its sectors. Reactivating walks UP only - a sector may
have been switched off for its own reasons, and silently resurrecting it would
undo a decision nobody made twice. That asymmetry is deliberate and is pinned by
a named check so it does not get "fixed" into a surprise.
Import reports rather than merges. Rejected rows come back with the SOURCE line
number and a reason; duplicates are listed as duplicates, separated into "already
in this project" and "already on line N of this import". Reusing a parent is not
a duplicate - B1/L2/1P and B1/L2/2P share a building and a floor by design, and
only the full path repeating counts. Re-importing a deactivated value brings the
same row back rather than creating a second one; the probe checks the id.
One parser, on the server. A CSV is read in the browser and posted as text
exactly as a paste is, so "what does a blank column mean" has one answer.
Comma, semicolon and tab all work - a paste out of a spreadsheet is tab
separated and a saved CSV is not, and which one somebody has is a question the
machine can answer.
No guessed floor names. IMPLEMENTATION.md section 8 says the B100 list has not
been supplied. The seeded sample has "Sample" inside every string, and the probe
greps html/ and server/ for a location-shaped assignment containing any of the
review's real names.
server/models.py LocationNode
server/alembic/versions/e2a4c7d91b30_location_taxonomy.py
server/app.py GET/POST/PATCH + import, parser, slug
html/work-package-suite.html step 11, an 11th rail button
html/work-package-suite-app.js the step's logic; LAST_STEP replaces 10
html/work-package-suite-styles.css the list, the report
html/theme-light.css .field-error, now declared once
tests/locations_check.py new - 58 checks
tests/stepper_check.py STEP_COUNT 10 -> 11
Done when
[x] CSV upload and paste both work and report rejected rows with reasons
[x] duplicates are detected and reported rather than silently merged
[x] values are editable after import - rename, add, deactivate
[x] deactivating hides it from new work packages; an existing package
referencing it still resolves, because the row is retained
[x] values are stored as codes suitable for grouping
[x] no guessed real-world floor names exist anywhere in the code
Two decisions worth disagreeing with
Step 11, appended, not step 2, inserted. Locations belong beside Project by
subject. Renumbering 2-10 would touch every sop-step-N id, every
collectStepData case, every gate key and the analytics history - a large
silent-mismatch surface for an ordering change. The count now lives in one
place (LAST_STEP), so reordering later is cheap.
Any project member may edit the list, not only a Project Admin. It matches how
the SOP baseline itself is authored: the Project Admin gate is on CHANGING a
completed SOP, not on writing one. If the location list should be tighter than
the SOP it belongs to, that is a product call.
Verified one at a time
locations_check 58/58 new
stepper_check 70/70 (11 steps)
browser_check 71/71
a11y 22/22 sop now rings 38 focusable elements
url_state 23/23
autosave 34/34
aggregates 16/16
pipeline 43/43
launcher 58/58
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
alembic upgrade / downgrade / upgrade all clean on a throwaway SQLite
file, and the migrated schema matches Base.metadata.create_all
column for column - dev auto-creates and production migrates,
so a divergence between the two is invisible until it ships
.field-error was declared in two page sheets by the end of T5.2 and would have
been three by T5.8, so it moved to theme-light.css. No colour literal added
anywhere: still 0 across all page sheets and inline blocks.
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: the levels are fixed at building / floor /
sector. Micron's floors behave like buildings, which this handles by letting a
project use whichever levels it needs - but a job that wants a fourth level, or
different names for the three, cannot say so. Whether that is worth a
per-project level vocabulary is a product question; the schema would take it
without a migration.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 6088ef17e8 |
T5.3 - B4 surface: a pipeline strip, four server counts, four shareable links
Four cells on the launcher - Work packages, Release ready, On hold, Overdue -
every number from /api/wps/metrics, which T4.1 built. There is deliberately no
cache fallback anywhere in renderPipeline(): a remembered number sitting beside
three live ones is the failure B4 exists to remove, wearing a different hat.
The cells are the four the endpoint already computes and the dashboard already
filters on, so they map 1:1 onto its flags rather than inventing a fifth slice
nothing downstream understands. wp-creation-app.js now names them (DASH_FLAGS)
for the same reason: a cell linking to a filter the board does not recognise is
a dead link that still looks live.
"Links to a filtered view via a shareable URL" needed the filter to BE URL state,
which it was not - the dashboard kept its flag in a variable. So:
- dashToggleFlag pushes ?flag=<f>, and clears it on the way out of the board
- the creator applies ?flag= before its first render, not after (applying it
after paints the whole board and throws it away)
- Back and Forward move through filters like any other state
- work-package-suite-app.js forwards the flag ACROSS the iframe boundary, since
the creator's src carries only the project. B7/T7.1 dissolves that frame and
this hand-off goes with it; it is commented as such.
Zero is a real answer for one slice of a project that has work in it. Four zeros
on a project with none is not a reading, it is a strip that looks broken - that
case gets a sentence and a way into the creator instead. A failed request gets an
explicit error naming the failure, and no cells at all.
html/index.html the strip, its states, PIPE_CELLS
html/wp-creation-app.js flag as URL state; DASH_FLAGS; dashApplyFlag
html/work-package-suite-app.js forward the flag into the frame; clear on exit
tests/pipeline_check.py new - 43 checks
Done when
[x] every number comes from a server endpoint - proved by poisoning localStorage
with 99 fake packages and demanding the strip still read the server's 4
[x] each cell links to a filtered view via a shareable URL - and the probe
FOLLOWS the link and reads the filter inside the frame rather than trusting
that a correct-looking URL was built
[x] a project with zero work packages renders a sensible empty state
[x] the strip announces updates via aria-live (polite - a count is not an
interruption) and reports aria-busy while it is counting
What the probe caught
The link landed on "Complete the SOP Configuration first". Not the strip's
fault: browser_check.py's fixture stores a bare {governance: …} blob as the SOP
data, where production stores {sop, state}. restoreSavedSOP() needs `state` and
bails without it, so sopComplete stays false and the WP tab shows its gate.
pipeline_check seeds the production shape. The underlying wart is real and is
logged rather than fixed - see BL-018.
Verified one at a time
pipeline_check 43/43 new
launcher_check 58/58
stepper_check 70/70
url_state 23/23 the dashboard's new flag state did not disturb it
aggregates 16/16
browser_check 71/71
a11y 22/22
autosave 34/34
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
No colour literal added: still 0 across all page sheets and inline blocks. The
four cells are told apart by a label, a sentence and an accent - three channels,
so colour is not carrying it alone (C1).
Raised, not fixed
BL-018 The WP tab's gate is the last localStorage-derived status in the app.
T4.1 moved the launcher's card to the server; the wizard page still
decides gate-or-creator from wp_suite_sop_complete plus a state blob.
pullProject refreshes both on load so a connected user is fine, but the
two answers come from different places and the fallback is silent.
Includes a second, sharper edge: project-data.js:210 writes that flag
for ANY row returned, including one with no `state` to restore - so the
flag is written and never read consistently. T7.1 owns it.
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: the strip counts Overdue against `data.due`,
which is free text today. CR-004/CR-018 restructure location but not dates. If
"overdue" is going to drive anything beyond a launcher tile, that field needs a
type.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 77c043c3db |
T5.2 - B3: a first-run empty state, then the picker card comes out
B3's warning is about ORDER, and it is the whole item: the proposal removes the
project-picker card, and the first-run empty state was built inside it. Remove
the card first and every brand-new account lands on a page whose only
instruction is to choose from a list with nothing in it.
So the empty state was built first, as its own thing rather than a branch inside
a control that is going away, and only then did the card go.
The launcher now shows exactly one of three states:
no projects at all what a project is for, the create form already open (it
is the only thing to do on this page, so hiding it behind
a button is one click of ceremony in front of the only
way forward), and the sample offered underneath it
none chosen point at the app bar's switcher, which is on every page,
plus New project
one active the tool cards, as before
Switching moved to the app bar's switcher entirely. Its popover footer used to
read "All projects / new project" and link to index.html - half of that promise
moved into the popover itself and the other half needs a form, so the link now
says New project and carries #new-project, which the launcher opens on.
The create form was rebuilt, so per C1 it ships accessible: a real <form> with
requestSubmit, every input labelled, and its validation inline at the field with
aria-describedby and role="alert" - the same shape T5.8 gives the wizard. That
retires the "Project name is required." alert (index.html 6 -> 5).
html/index.html three states, rebuilt create form, picker card removed
html/wp-chrome.js popover footer link (one line - it named the card)
tests/launcher_check.py new - 58 checks, two seeded databases
tests/f_items.py F1 rewritten to drive the controls that replaced the select
Done when
[x] a brand-new account with zero projects sees a clear path to create one
[x] the sample project remains discoverable from the empty state
[x] the picker card is removed only after the empty state ships
[x] switching projects still works from the header for users who have projects
Two things the probes caught that I would have shipped
F1 went INCONCLUSIVE, not FAIL. Its probe drove `document.querySelector
('select')` on the launcher - the picker card's dropdown. It refused to guess
rather than reporting a silent pass, which is the behaviour f_items was
written for. Rewritten to drive both replacements, because they fail
differently: the switcher RELOADS with ?project=<id>, so its two labels cannot
drift apart whatever subscribes to what; creating a project changes the active
project IN PAGE, and that is the interaction F1's mechanism actually applies
to. It is now the only in-page change on the launcher, so it is the arm that
matters. Both pass - the bar subscribes through ProjectData.onActiveChange.
launcher_check reported "no focus ring" on the rebuilt form's inputs. That was
trap 5 in reverse: without CDP focus emulation the headless document is not
the focused one, :focus-visible never matches, and every control reports NO
ring - a false red where a11y_check would get a false green. With emulation on
they draw 2px --cds-focus from T4.7's app-wide floor.
Verified one at a time
launcher_check 58/58 new (38 empty-account + 20 populated)
stepper_check 70/70
browser_check 71/71
aggregates 16/16
a11y 22/22 launcher 29 focusable elements, all >= 3:1
url_state 23/23
autosave 34/34
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
No colour literal added: 0 across all five page sheets and all seven inline
<style> blocks.
Raised, not fixed
BL-014 updated rather than left stale: two of its four sites (.proj-row select,
.link-like) went with the picker card, and the third (.proj-form-grid input)
was measured rather than assumed - it draws T4.7's ring, which post-dates that
entry. What survives is field.html's .fld-search, which T9.5 should measure the
same way instead of inheriting the wording.
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: with the picker gone, an account whose only
project is archived sees the choose-a-project prompt plus the archived note, and
the switcher lists nothing. That is honest but bleak. Whether an archived project
should stay switchable read-only is a product call, not an implementation one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 5e1f6e75ba |
T5.1 - A4/S9: a vertical stepper, ten real buttons, states in words
The step rail was ten div elements carrying onclick inside a horizontal
scroller. Not in the tab order, not operable by keyboard, and silent about
progress - the only thing on the page that said where you were was a "1 / 10"
pill in the app bar, detached from the control it described.
The rail is now a vertical column beside the form: ten <button> elements in an
<ol> inside a named <nav>, with arrow keys, Home and End on top of the Enter and
Space a button gives for free. All ten stay in the tab order; a roving tabindex
would have satisfied "arrow keys" by breaking "tab", which the done-when asks
for both of.
Four states, each carrying a word and a marker shape as well as a colour (C1):
Complete (green disc, tick), Current step (blue disc, aria-current="step"),
Locked (dashed outline) and a plain default. Locked steps keep aria-disabled
rather than disabled, so a keyboard user can reach one and be told what is in
the way instead of finding a control that has vanished from the tab order.
Reachability is the guard's own rule, deliberately not a stricter one: you may
leave the step you are on once its required fields are filled. The tempting rule
- lock everything after the first unmet gate anywhere - is not what
validateStep() enforces, and a padlock the Next button walks straight past is
the drift this change exists to remove. validateStep() and the rail now read one
STEP_GATES table, so they cannot disagree; T5.8 widens that table rather than
editing four functions.
Clicking a step you cannot reach announces why through a role="alert" region and
puts the cursor in the field that is missing. Saying "no" and leaving you where
you were, with no idea which of five inputs was empty, is what the dialog did.
Below 900px the rail collapses to a disclosure naming the step you are on -
ten vertical rows above the fields is most of a 390px screen before you reach an
input. 44px tap targets, since Field View is the gloved-hands surface.
Also: going backwards is no longer gated. previousStep() never validated, so a
rail that did would have trapped you on an incomplete step.
html/work-package-suite.html rail markup, counter removed
html/work-package-suite-styles.css #tool-sop grid, .step-rail*, 899px collapse
html/work-package-suite-app.js STEP_GATES, renderStepRail, keyboard, watcher
tests/stepper_check.py new - 70 checks
Done when
[x] all 10 steps are <button> elements
[x] keyboard: tab, arrow keys, Home/End, Enter and Space
[x] aria-current on the current step, exactly one
[x] complete / current / unavailable told apart without colour
[x] the "1 / 10" counter is gone - no .step-counter, no N/10 in the app bar
[x] app-wide <div onclick> 12 -> 2, down exactly 10
Verified one at a time
stepper_check 70/70 new
browser_check 71/71
url_state 23/23
a11y 22/22 sop now rings 37 focusable elements, all >= 3:1
autosave 34/34
aggregates 16/16
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
baseline_shots 14 shots; only the sop pair changed. The beforeunload log on
sop@1440 and creator@1440 is present at HEAD too - captured
both sides to check rather than assume.
No colour literal was added: all five page sheets and all seven inline <style>
blocks still hold zero. New spacing consumes --wp-s*; three raw font sizes were
added and three removed, so BL-010 is unchanged in kind.
Raised, not fixed
BL-016 Back to a URL with no `step` leaves the wizard where it was. T4.2's
popstate handler parses NaN and ignores it; its own probe never took
that branch. stepper_check pins the current behaviour by name so the
fix has a test waiting.
BL-017 The native-dialog baseline counts the word `alert(` in comments. Four
comments written here - all of them about removing a dialog - moved
the number from 80 to 82 while two real calls were being deleted. They
were reworded; the metric still needs a comment-stripped variant, which
T5.8 owns.
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: BL-015 leaves the creator's .step-tab
uppercase as the last forced-uppercase interactive text in the suite, on the
grounds that A5 scopes sentence case to buttons and field labels. The wizard's
rail is now buttons, so its labels are sentence case ("Sign-offs", "WP types").
The two are consistent by rule and inconsistent on screen until T7.x.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 6fbc5b9735 |
Wave 4 exit - record the new probes and move the baseline counts
Wave 4's five exit criteria, and what shows each of them: counts come from the server, identical across users aggregates_check 16/16 work packages addressable by URL, incl. signed-out url_state_check 23/23 drafts autosave, unsaved work guarded, save honest autosave_check 34/34 toasts announce, helper text legible, focus visible a11y_check 22/22 X1 and X5 cleared see below X1 is cleared: a work package has an address, and WPUrl.absolute() is what CR-011 and CR-014 will paste into an email in wave 8. X5 is cleared: /api/wps/metrics returns by_location with its dimensions declared alongside the groups, so CR-004 and CR-018 can group by building/floor/sector in wave 6 by changing the dimensions and the keys, not the response shape. Four metrics moved off their wave 0 baselines and are recorded in the file map so wave 9 measures against the right numbers. The one that matters most is not in the plan's list: `outline: none` went from six to one, and the survivor has its replacement in the rule directly above it. The file map also now says to run the browser probes ONE AT A TIME. Chained, they exhaust the headless browser's ports and abort with "browser would not start", which reads as a code fault and is not one - it cost a confusing red run here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 12c0e5ca74 |
Wave 3 exit - record what the wave actually changed on screen
wave-3.md asks for "no unintended visual change on any page versus wave 2".
Measured with tests/token_check.py,
|
|||
| ce6fb840f0 |
T3.5 - A5: one button system, and green goes back to being a status
251 buttons across the 7 pages, counted in the browser with every wizard step,
creator section and tool panel forced visible. Two thirds of them are
display:none at load, so a static grep sees about eighty and misses the rest.
FOUR ROLES, defined once in theme-light.css as --wp-btn-*, and no fifth:
primary the one action the screen exists for. Filled accent.
secondary every other real action. White, --border-strong, accent on hover.
tertiary navigating or undoing. No fill, no border, accent text.
danger destructive. Outlined red; filled red only where the control is too
small for an outline to read - the 28px x on a sequence row.
Every button class is mapped to a role in docs/reference/tokens.md section 12.
No value is new: these are the fills the sheets already rendered, given one
definition so that "primary" means one thing.
GREEN IS A STATUS COLOUR AND NO LONGER FILLS A BUTTON. A5 names two green action
buttons; there are four. .use-btn and the launcher's completed-SOP card button
never render green in the default fixture, so the review could not have seen
them - the SOP has to be finished and a suggested value has to be offered first.
.nav-btn.primary "SOP complete" wizard
.btn.btn-generate "Save & view" creator
.use-btn creator
.card.complete .card-button launcher
The green did not go anywhere. .cstatus button.on-cleared, .toggle-btn.enabled,
.wp-nav-dot.ok, .rb-ready, .badge-R and the launcher card's own left border and
status line all still carry it, and every one of those is a state rather than an
action. The launcher card in particular still says "complete" twice after this
change; it just no longer says it on the button.
SENTENCE CASE, applied to buttons and field labels only, which is the scope A5
sets. First word capitalised, the rest lowercased, acronyms and external proper
nouns left alone (SOP, QC, WP, UPN, PM/APM/CM/QM, PDF, JSON, CSV, BIM, MIMO,
Excel, Acumatica).
~30 button labels across launcher, wizard, creator, admin and two scripts
46 field labels
text-transform:uppercase removed from 4 rules - .btn and .add-btn (creator
buttons), label and .cmt-namebar label (creator field labels)
Labels carrying markup - a .req asterisk, a .help-tip chip - had only their text
nodes transformed, so the markup survives and "first word" means the first word
of the label rather than of each fragment. The creator's mono face, 10px size and
tracking are its idiom and are untouched; only the forced uppercase goes.
help.js was updated too. It names "Load Sample" and "SOP Complete" in prose, so
renaming the buttons without it would have left the help centre describing
controls that no longer exist. That coupling is the only place in the app where
button text is referenced by name.
Verified by re-running the inventory: 0 green action buttons, 0 uppercase button
labels, 251 buttons still present - nothing was lost in the rename.
console.css card headers are unchanged, confirmed by diff: the only six lines
this task touches in that file are token substitutions on button/button.primary/
button.danger, none of them within twenty lines of .card h2.
f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES. browser_check 71/71.
Left alone and logged: .step-tab is still uppercase (BL-015) - it is a stepper
tab, neither a button nor a field label, and A4/S9 rebuild the stepper. Table
headers, section eyebrows and headings keep their case throughout. BL-008 and
BL-009 were re-targeted from T3.5 to wave 9: both are colour merges on a field
fill and a status pill, and this task is scoped to buttons.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 03d24138ed |
T3.4 - A3/F5 full, BL-002: the wizard's fields look editable and focus is visible
T1.5 stopped editable fields looking disabled by reaching past the wizard's own token block with a fallback: background: var(--cds-field, var(--bg-card)). T3.2 deleted the local tokens, so the fallback is now dead code and the canonical token is simply consumed. The interim comment is gone; grep for INTERIM in the sheet returns nothing, and the sheet declares no field-specific colour. Measured in the browser rather than asserted - every enabled text control in the suite, side by side: sop .field input #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px sop .user-pick #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px creator .field input #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px console .toolbar input #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px launcher .proj-row #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px .user-pick was not identical before this commit, and that is the one thing here beyond the written task. The sign-off name pickers were --bg on a --border hairline - #f4f4f4 on #e0e0e0, which is precisely the grey-on-grey that F5/A3 is about. They were missed because the review counted inputs inside .field and these two sit outside it, which is why they needed their own rule in the first place. Fixing the token duplication without fixing them would have left the defect on the page while reporting it closed. Disabled fields stay distinguishable: f_items F5 reads them at #f4f4f4 on the same #8d8d8d border, so fill carries locked-vs-editable and the border does not move. BL-002 folded in, as that entry asks. All three outline:none sites in this sheet are gone: .field input/select/textarea:focus had a 3px --primary-light glow .user-pick:focus had the same glow .seq-step input.seq-label:focus had NO replacement at all #edf5ff against a #ffffff field is a 1.05:1 edge - a faint halo on the card and nothing at all on the field. Replaced with the ring console.css:69 and wp-chrome.css:206 already draw, so this is the app's existing idiom rather than a fourth one: 2px of --cds-focus, inset by -2px over the control's own edge. Verified with CDP focus emulation ON. Without it the headless page is not the focused document, :focus never matches, and every reading comes back as the unfocused style - which looks like a pass and is not one. It cost a wrong answer before I noticed, so it is worth saying. .user-pick and .seq-label also live on later wizard steps, which are display:none and cannot take focus, so the probe reveals the steps before measuring: .field input / select / textarea 2px solid #0f62fe offset -2px .user-pick 2px solid #0f62fe offset -2px .seq-label 2px solid #0f62fe offset -2px f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES. browser_check 71/71. Two findings outside this task's files, logged rather than fixed: BL-013, the creator's inputs have NO outline on focus and rely on the same 1.05:1 glow, which is BL-002's defect in the sheet next door and belongs to T7.2; and BL-014, four controls on the launcher and field view fall back to the UA default ring, which is visible but is a fourth idiom - T9.5 with C1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 9ab7b48de2 |
T3.2 - C3/S5: one source of truth for colour; page sheets alias only
theme-light.css is now the only file in html/ that contains a colour literal. The five page stylesheets and all four inline <style> blocks declare names and nothing else. theme-light.css 191 declarations, 175 with a literal value console.css 28 declarations, 0 work-package-suite-styles.css 16 declarations, 0 wp-chrome.css 14 declarations, 0 wp-creation-styles.css 24 declarations, 0 wp-sidenav.css 0 declarations, 0 #0f62fe is declared in one sheet, down from five. The eleven occurrences left inside theme-light.css are Carbon's own v10-to-v11 alias layer, which the inventory records as deliberate and not the S5 defect. Names were kept, because 111 var() references live in .js files across 23 token names and a rename there fails silently - no build error, no console warning, just an unstyled element. The rule the refactor was built on: consolidation is not unification. Where two sheets declared the same value, they collapse. Where they declared DIFFERENT values for one role - the two shadows, the eight status borders doing four jobs, the three mono stacks - each value got its own canonical name and the pair is recorded for T3.5. Picking a winner between two near-identical greys is a rendered change, which this task forbids. The console's zebra stripe is the one that would have bitten: #fafafa is six points from #f4f4f4, and merging them erases the striping on the nine-column user table. Collecting the one-offs in one place made two things countable that were not before: twelve distinct shadows, and a ninth amber (#8a6d00 on the field view, four points from #8e6a00 and doing the same job - BL-009). VERIFICATION - the screenshot done-when could not do the job, so it was replaced. Captured against wave 2, 11 of 14 shots were pixel-identical and 3 were not. Capturing wave 2 against ITSELF produced the same 3 differences at the same bounding box, so those shots cannot distinguish a regression from the clock. Trap 2 in the brief is half wrong: users.html is stable at both widths; the unstable third is the creator at 1440px, and admin's captured page height varies by ~600px between runs (BL-012). So tests/token_check.py was added. It checks what wave 3 actually claims: that every custom property resolves to the same literal, and every element computes the same colours, shadows and type. That is stronger than a screenshot - it covers the hover, focus and disabled rules a screenshot never exercises, and it is deterministic. wave 2 vs T3.2, all 7 pages: 178/178 wave-2 token names resolve identically, +213 new 3,500 elements compute identically, zero added, zero removed 16 tokens differ in notation only (#fff -> #ffffff), which is the duplicate class this task existed to collapse Two detours worth not repeating: the element walk was first keyed by sibling index and reported 55 phantom differences on the SOP page, where three JS-injected overlays append in whichever order their async work finishes (BL-011); and the comparator now normalises notation before reporting, because otherwise it fails on its own success. f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES as expected. browser_check 71/71. ONE DONE-WHEN NOT MET, recorded rather than skipped: "no page stylesheet declares a raw color, spacing or type value". The colour half is met in full. 483 raw spacing values, 281 font-sizes and 65 radii remain inside rules, 492 of them in the creator. That is arithmetic, not effort: the creator's spacing is every integer from 1px to 14px, so no token exists that padding:9px 11px maps to without changing one of the numbers - and this task forbids changing a rendered value. The two requirements are mutually exclusive. Logged as BL-010 for T5.x and T7.1, where those pages are re-laid-out and the values get chosen again. New backlog: BL-009 (ninth amber), BL-010 (raw spacing/type in rules), BL-011 (overlay append race), BL-012 (unstable screenshot targets). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 0e40e967a0 |
T3.1 - C3/S5: inventory the token systems, and correct the accent baseline
Produces docs/reference/tokens.md. No stylesheet is touched; T3.1 is inventory. What the inventory found that the plan did not say: - It is six stylesheets plus the launcher's inline <style>, not four (D1 again). 202 custom-property declarations, all listed with file and line. - The wave 0 accent baseline is wrong: 15 declarations across 5 sheets, not 14 across 4. console.css:13 packs five declarations onto one line and the baseline's `^\s*--` regex only ever matches the first, so console's own --accent was never counted. Corrected command is in tokens.md section 10. The wave 9 target of one sheet is unchanged; there is one more to remove. - Three mono stacks, not two. The file map recorded console.css dropping ui-monospace and Segoe UI Mono; wp-chrome.css:159,221 is a third stack that drops Cascadia Mono and Segoe UI Mono. - --shadow-lg does not differ by blur, as the file map says. Both are 0 4px 16px. The difference is the colour: rgba(0,0,0,.16) against rgba(20,30,50,.12). That means they can be unified later with no layout consequence at all. - Twelve var() fallbacks can never fire, because the token they fall back from is declared at :root on a sheet the page loads. Free deletions for T3.2. - --shadow: none is a no-op token with 8 consumers. Left for T3.3, which is hunting exactly this class of silent nothing. - 111 var() references live in .js files across 23 token names. A rename there fails silently - no build error, no console warning, just an unstyled element. Section 9 is the list to grep before deleting any alias. - There is a second brand blue: #2563d6, filling .sop-inherited at 7% alpha on every field a work package inherited from its SOP. Logged as BL-008. The document states one rule up front, because it is the difference between a clean wave 3 and a broken one: consolidation is not unification. Where two sheets declare the same value, T3.2 collapses them. Where they declare different values for the same role - the two banner greens, the three error borders, the two shadows - each value gets its own canonical name and the pair is recorded. Picking a winner between two near-identical greys is a visual change, which T3.2 forbids. Section 8 computes the near-duplicates rather than eyeballing them. The one to watch is the zebra stripe: console's #fafafa sits six points from #f4f4f4, and collapsing them erases the striping on the nine-column user table. New backlog entries: BL-004 (help.js ships 52 colours in a different design language), BL-005 (two modals styled entirely by inline style= attributes), BL-006 (17 half-pixel font sizes), BL-007 (--radius: 0 contradicted 45 times in the sheet that declares it), BL-008 (the second blue). One decision T3.2 needs and this task cannot make: adopting the superset mono stack changes the rendered face on machines that have Segoe UI Mono or ui-monospace but not IBM Plex Mono, which is most of the target environment. That is a real change on admin and users. Either accept it and re-shoot those two baselines - capturing twice, since they are not byte-stable - or keep console.css's narrower stack as a second token until T3.5. Written up in tokens.md section 6d and 8-H; built to neither until it is answered. Verification: f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES as expected, browser_check 71/71. Screenshots not applicable - this task changes no rendered surface. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| b105135a98 |
T2.3 - B2: a breakpoint plan for the project switcher, not an ellipsis
"Micron EUV Cleanroom Enable 2667008" did not fit. The switcher capped the name
at 240px inside a 280px button, so the real project name was ellipsised to
"Micron EUV Clean..." on the one control whose job is to tell you which job you
are in - which is the failure this item exists to prevent.
The plan, now written into docs/reference/file-map.md so it is not re-litigated:
>= 1024px the full project NAME. Caps raised to 400px / 340px, which is
enough for a real name with no ellipsis.
< 1024px the project NUMBER alone, e.g. 2667008. Dropping the name beats
shortening it: short, stable, unambiguous.
The number is no longer prefixed to the name at wide widths. Real names already
end with their number, so the old format printed it twice - the test project
rendered as "2667008 - Micron EUV Cleanroom Enable 2667008".
The full name stays reachable at every width by three routes, none hover-only,
because the Field View is a touch surface:
- the drawer, which now shows the active project under its head, wrapping onto
as many lines as it needs and never truncated. This is the guaranteed route,
and it subscribes to ProjectData.onActiveChange so it does not go stale when
the launcher switches project without reloading.
- the switcher's title attribute, carrying the full number and name, which
surfaces on keyboard focus as well as hover.
- the switcher popover, which lists every project in full.
Crossing the breakpoint re-labels, so a resized window does not keep whichever
form was chosen at load.
Verified with the real long name at 390, 768, 1024 and 1440: nothing truncated
at any width (scrollWidth vs clientWidth, not by eye), and the drawer carries
the whole name at all four. T1.1 correctness holds - the switcher never reads
"Select a project" while a project is active.
f_items: F1-F5 FIXED, F3 still passing at all four widths with the wider
switcher. browser_check 71/71.
Wave 2 complete: one drawer on six pages, no flat strip, F2 resolved for real,
S4 closed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 0a080be1f8 |
T2.1 - B1 part 1: the drawer is already one shared component; verified, not rebuilt
No code change. T2.1 asks to lift the drawer out of "three near-copies" into one shared implementation. There are no copies to lift. html/wp-sidenav.js and html/wp-sidenav.css are already a single implementation included by admin, field view and directory. .wp-sidenav, .wp-navscrim and .wp-navbtn are each declared in exactly one file, and no page defines its own drawer. The review's sentence was that the drawer "ships on 3 of 6 pages while a flat strip duplicates it" - the duplication is between the drawer and the flat strip, not among three drawers. The plan read "3 of 6 pages" as "3 copies". It already satisfies every T2.1 done-when, including the one that could have failed: activeProjectId() at wp-sidenav.js:62-68 reads ?project= and falls back to ProjectData.getActiveId(), which is the single source T1.1 established. It also self-mounts into .wp-appbar OR .header and returns early inside an iframe, so it is already built for the pages T2.2 has to put it on. Refactoring a single shared component into a single shared component would be churn with regression risk and nothing gained, so nothing was touched. Recorded as file-map D5 so the next reader does not go looking for the copies either. The real work of this wave is T2.2. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 5f3141e2a3 |
T1.5 - F5 (interim): wizard fields stop looking disabled
INTERIM. T3.4 removes the duplicate token underneath this; the job here is only the appearance, and no token consolidation is started. The wizard filled its inputs with var(--bg) - which in this sheet is the PAGE BACKGROUND, #f4f4f4 - on a #e0e0e0 border. An empty required field was indistinguishable from a locked one, which is why people were not typing in them. The cause is the one the review named: this sheet redeclares its own tokens, so it never saw --cds-field: #ffffff, even though theme-light.css has been supplying that to this page all along. Fields now consume --cds-field, and take the same --border-strong the creator's inputs already use, so a field looks like a field on both pages. No new value is introduced - both tokens already existed. That inverts a signal if left there, so it needed the other half: there was no disabled rule at all on this page, meaning locked fields would have turned white too. Disabled and readonly fields now take --cds-field-02, the theme's own secondary field surface, matching .locked-field in the creator. Enabled #ffffff against disabled #f4f4f4, verified by computed style rather than by eye. The border is deliberately the same on both states. I first wrote `border-color: var(--border)` on the disabled rule and could not demonstrate it taking effect - the rule matches, is more specific than the base rule, and its background applies, but the computed border stayed --border-strong. Rather than ship a declaration whose effect I cannot show, it is gone: a consistent border is what "consistent with inputs elsewhere" asks for, and the fill is what carries the state. Screenshot diff is limited to the wizard, but establishing that took a control run. admin and users appeared to change too, until capturing twice with NO code change showed they differ from themselves - the console pages render live timestamps and are not byte-stable. login, launcher, sop, creator and field are. Recorded in the baseline README so the next task with a "no layout change" done-when does not chase it. The F5 probe now also fails if enabled and disabled fields become identical, which is the way this fix could silently go wrong. f_items: F1-F5 FIXED, F6 untouched as wave 1 requires. browser_check 71/71. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 4d3258113a |
T1.4 - F4: the comments drawer opens below the header, not under it
Containing block first, as the task asks. The drawer is a body child with no
transformed ancestor, so its containing block was already the viewport - the
positioning context was never wrong. What was wrong was `top: 0` with
`height: 100vh`: the drawer started at the very top of the viewport, and the
creator's .header is sticky with z-index:100 against the drawer's 61. The
header won, so the drawer's own head - its title and its close button - was
roofed over and unreachable. It read as "off-screen" because the part you
needed was covered, not because the box had escaped the viewport.
That is why raising z-index would have been the wrong move: it does not remove
the collision, it just swaps which element is on top, and then the drawer
covers the header instead. The fix is to stop them occupying the same band.
The drawer now starts at var(--rail-top) and is that much shorter. --rail-top
is the header's measured height, set by wp-creation-app.js:1328 and already
used by .wp-nav for exactly this purpose, so "below the header" has one
definition on this page rather than two.
The iframe boundary is NOT implicated. position:fixed inside the embedded
creator resolves against the iframe's own viewport, which is self-consistent,
and the drawer behaves identically framed and unframed. T7.1 can dissolve the
boundary without revisiting this.
The probe was checking one width, one mode, and placement only. It now checks
390 and 1440, standalone and embedded, that the close button is genuinely
hit-testable via elementFromPoint rather than merely present, that the drawer
reopens after closing, and that opening it does not move the page's scroll
position. All pass.
One honest caveat, attributed rather than hidden. At 390px the drawer sits at
the right edge of a 485px layout viewport while the screen is 390px, so 95px of
it is off-screen. That is not the drawer: the creator forces its containing
block to 485px, and while chasing it I found BL-001's root cause -
wp-creation-app.js:1389 injects `body{--nav-w:288px}` with no media query,
which lands after wp-creation-styles.css:815's
`@media (max-width:860px){body{--nav-w:56px}}` and overrides it, so the page
reserves 288px of rail that is not there at any width. Every `right: 0` fixed
element on the page is displaced by it, not only this one.
Left unfixed on purpose - it is the creator's layout, T7.1 rebuilds it, and
CLAUDE.md is explicit about not fixing things noticed in passing. BL-001 now
carries the exact cause and the five rules that consume the token, so T7.1 does
not have to find it again. The probe reports it as an attributed note naming
BL-001, so nobody is sent to the wrong file.
browser_check 71/71. f_items: F1, F2, F3, F4 FIXED.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 440f3239a4 |
T1.2 - log the two backlog entries the commit message referenced
BL-001 updated: its 1440px half was resolved as a side effect of the F2 fix, not by intent. Left open, scoped to the creator at 390px, so T7.1 still checks it. BL-003 added: user-menu links are 16px tap targets. T1.2 made them reachable; it did not make them comfortable. Deferred to T2.2, which replaces the markup. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| fe8a27e022 |
T0.2 - baseline captured; all six rendering defects confirmed present
Runs the app from a clean database, captures the before images, and records which of F1-F6 actually still reproduce. All six do. Rather than eyeball screenshots, each defect is measured in a browser by tests/f_items.py, which reports REPRODUCES / FIXED / INCONCLUSIVE and never a silent pass. That makes it both the wave 0 record and the wave 1-3 regression check: an item is done when its probe flips to FIXED. F1 hero says "Job A", app bar still says "Select a project", no reload F2 "Sign out" spans x382-432 in a 390px viewport - cut in half, 3 rows F3 chrome paints over the logo by 106x32px; .header-left collapses to 0 F4 comments drawer overlaps the header by 380x91px in the standalone creator F5 5 of 5 ENABLED wizard inputs compute #f4f4f4 on #e0e0e0 F6 11 cards in one 5,017px scroll, 0 tabs (review said ~4,700px; it grew) Three probes needed care to avoid reporting a false pass, and the traps are worth knowing before anyone verifies a fix: F1 disappears if localStorage is primed first, because then both sources of truth agree. The probe clears it and drives the real picker. F3 needs a long project name that is long IN THE DATABASE - any page reached with ?project= re-pulls it and overwrites a locally-faked one. It also cannot be measured by comparing .header-left to the chrome: under the long name .header-left (flex:1, min-width:0) collapses to clientWidth 0, so that comparison reports a tidy zero gap while the chrome paints across the logo. It measures against .logo, which is flex-shrink:0. My first two attempts at this probe both reported FIXED for those reasons; the screenshot did not. F5 must ignore genuinely disabled inputs or a fix looks done while real fields stay grey. 14 screenshots, not the 12 the plan asks for, because there are 7 pages (file-map D1). Capture also measures horizontal overflow, which is how BL-001 was found. Tooling: cdp.py gains viewport() and screenshot() - it could do neither, and T0.2 requires 390px and 1440px images. 390px sets the mobile flag rather than just narrowing the window, since every page declares width=device-width and Chrome otherwise lays out at 980px and no media query under test fires. Both new scripts reuse browser_check.py's seed() and start_server() instead of growing a second fixture. Existing browser_check still passes 71/71. No application code changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| c2e35b9261 |
T0.1 - build the file map and verify the plan's line references
Wave 0 exists because the plan's line numbers came from a review of users/directory-super-user rather than a fresh read. This is the fresh read: 7 pages, 6 stylesheets, 11,867 lines, with each page's stylesheets, scripts and iframe role recorded, and all seven baseline counts captured with the command that produced them. Four discrepancies, one of which matters a great deal: D2 - CLAUDE.md's "logged-override path for predecessors stays (A1). See wp-creation-app.js:1962-1972" cites the wrong function. That range is dashIssue(), which REFUSES to issue and says "open the package to release it early with a logged reason". The reviewer read that sentence and correctly inferred an override exists, but cited the mention rather than the code. The audited path is confirmEarlyRelease() at 967-984 plus seven satellites (state at 392, call sites at 998 and 1149, persisted at 1117, rendered at 1215, rehydrated at 1674, reset at 481/488/1744). A T7.3 that preserved only 1962-1972 would delete the business rule while believing it had protected it. D1 - "6 pages, 4 stylesheets" is 7 and 6; wave-0's own parenthetical lists seven names. Every "all 6 pages" done-when is off by one. D3 - four documents the plan reads from are deliverables not yet written. D4 - the creator overflows horizontally at 1440px, which no F item covers. Logged as BL-001 rather than fixed, since T7.1 rebuilds that layout anyway. BL-002 records that outline:none appears three times in the wizard sheet, not once, so T3.4 fixes all three. Counts confirmed against the review: 79 dialogs (43 in the creator), 12 div and 2 span onclick, 15 help-tip badges, 0 aria-live, 0 pushState. The "4 declarations of #0f62fe" needed a definition - there are 31 occurrences and 14 custom-property declarations; the 4 is the number of stylesheets declaring their own accent token, which is the number wave 9 should drive to 1. No application code changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 3d99d4b9d0 |
Import the R2 implementation spec into the repo
The plan was delivered as wp-suite-implementation-spec.zip and lived only in Downloads, so every "read CLAUDE.md first" instruction in it pointed at a file the repo did not have. Bring it in unchanged: CLAUDE.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, and docs/waves/wave-0 through wave-9 plus backlog.md. UX-REVIEW-2026-08-14.md is committed alongside it. It is the review that produced F1-F6, S1-S13 and the A/B/C assessments, and item IDs throughout the wave files cite it, so it belongs under version control rather than sitting untracked in the working tree. No application code changes here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
