docs/reference/completion.md walks every item: the 55 from IMPLEMENTATION.md
section 6 and the 10 from decisions-2026-08-18.md. For each: status, the task
that delivered it, the probe that re-verifies it on every run, and every
deviation from written acceptance criteria - B7's page-not-merge (measured),
CR-014's email body (the no-customer-IP rule won), CR-008's merge-vs-list
(recommended, not decided), F6's 2.17-vs-2.0 (BL-022), S1's residual 21
dialogs (BL-024).
The four out-of-scope items are confirmed unbuilt - two of them by probes
that grep for their fields on every run. Section 8's outstanding inputs are
restated (the material workbook and the B100 list still have not arrived;
both upload paths are ready). The follow-ups for the next revision are in one
place, including three product questions raised in commit messages along the
way and the acceptance criteria that turned out wrong, for calibration.
One item in the whole plan is knowingly open: S13 (seed_demo sign-in),
carried with a reason, and F6's last number awaits a product answer.
Wave 9 exit criteria: seven of seven, ticked with their verifying probes.
Items: all
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nick answered 21 questions at the wave 6 exit and 11 follow-ups. Seven answers
are new build work, three amend acceptance criteria on tasks already scheduled,
and two close questions without work. None of it had an item ID, so none of it
could be built under CLAUDE.md's first rule.
New items D1-D10 in docs/waves/decisions-2026-08-18.md. A new prefix rather than
widened CR/F/S/A/B/C numbers - those are referenced in documents outside this
repo and CLAUDE.md forbids reinterpreting them. Every D entry names the item it
amends and quotes the criterion it replaces, so a reader of R2 can see what moved.
D1 sample data returns to the creator B7, S7 T7.1
D2 QA distribution list configured in the SOP CR-014 T7.6
D3 side navigation and collapsible sections, not tabs F6 T7.2
D4 Urgent surfaces the audited override, never bypasses CR-003/A1 T7.3
D5 usage data moves to the admin console B7 T7.10 (new)
D6 material list uploads at SOP configuration CR-013 T8.6 (new)
D7 archived projects readable by project admins B3, C1 T9.8 (new)
D8 5MB a file, 2GB a project, PDFs and images, one DB CR-007 T7.7
D9 Ready for QA appears in Field View CR-014 T7.6
D10 email switched on and off from the admin console CR-011/14 T7.6, T8.3
Two decisions were mine to make and are recorded as such. D3: the written F6
criterion (no view over two screen heights) and the answer (one long form with
side nav) cannot both hold, so the criterion now reads 'at rest' and sections
collapse by default - tabs hide sections a first-time author does not know exist.
D8: keeping 5MB files in the same database means every encrypted backup carries
them; splitting them out was rejected because a backup without the drawings
cannot restore, so a 2GB per-project ceiling was approved instead.
Also corrected, not amended: CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION.md X2 both cited
wp-creation-app.js:1962-1972 as the protected logged-override path that T7.3 is
forbidden to remove. Those lines are deletePackage() and clearSaved(). The path
is confirmEarlyRelease() at :1002. Both documents now name it by function so the
reference survives the T7.1 rewrite that is about to move it.
Wave 9 gains T9.9, a sweep of the nine backlog entries that name wave 9 as their
home. Left unscheduled they surface at T9.7, which has no room to fix anything.
The four colour items in it (BL-004/005/008/009) are now approved work.
T9.5's help-tip count corrected from 15 to 18 and dated: three were added during
waves 5 and 6 by tasks reusing the component as designed, each unreachable for
the same reason. Scheduling a broken component late makes every reuse cost more.
Closed without work: the free-text location migration. Every location on record
is sample data because no real list has been loaded, so there is nothing to
migrate. Recorded with the condition that invalidates it - the first real
project - so it is a decision rather than a surprise.
Items: D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10
Task: T7.0 (wave 7 prep)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The plan was delivered as wp-suite-implementation-spec.zip and lived only in
Downloads, so every "read CLAUDE.md first" instruction in it pointed at a file
the repo did not have. Bring it in unchanged: CLAUDE.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, and
docs/waves/wave-0 through wave-9 plus backlog.md.
UX-REVIEW-2026-08-14.md is committed alongside it. It is the review that
produced F1-F6, S1-S13 and the A/B/C assessments, and item IDs throughout the
wave files cite it, so it belongs under version control rather than sitting
untracked in the working tree.
No application code changes here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
