The housekeeping list carried S13 ('seed_demo.py does not sign in') from
completion.md and CLAUDE.md. It is not true and has not been since wave 1:
T1.6 (357712e) rewired seed_demo.py onto smoketest's opener - one cookie jar,
one login flow - and the file's own docstring says so. What actually happened:
the wave-1 exit checkbox was never ticked, and every later document inherited
the unticked box as fact.
Verified live before correcting anything, per the working rules: against a
throwaway server, seed_demo.py signs in as an admin, seeds the DEMO project
(7+ packages visible via the API), and --clean removes it, exit 0 both ways.
Corrected: the wave-1 exit box (ticked, with the reason), completion.md's S13
row (open -> built at T1.6, records error named), and CLAUDE.md's
verification step 4, which taught every future session the stale claim.
Item: S13 (closed as already-built; records corrected).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The plan was delivered as wp-suite-implementation-spec.zip and lived only in
Downloads, so every "read CLAUDE.md first" instruction in it pointed at a file
the repo did not have. Bring it in unchanged: CLAUDE.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, and
docs/waves/wave-0 through wave-9 plus backlog.md.
UX-REVIEW-2026-08-14.md is committed alongside it. It is the review that
produced F1-F6, S1-S13 and the A/B/C assessments, and item IDs throughout the
wave files cite it, so it belongs under version control rather than sitting
untracked in the working tree.
No application code changes here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
