ab3c9e52d127977ad5ecb27878f51fe3ee0bfbd5
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9ab7b48de2 |
T3.2 - C3/S5: one source of truth for colour; page sheets alias only
theme-light.css is now the only file in html/ that contains a colour literal. The five page stylesheets and all four inline <style> blocks declare names and nothing else. theme-light.css 191 declarations, 175 with a literal value console.css 28 declarations, 0 work-package-suite-styles.css 16 declarations, 0 wp-chrome.css 14 declarations, 0 wp-creation-styles.css 24 declarations, 0 wp-sidenav.css 0 declarations, 0 #0f62fe is declared in one sheet, down from five. The eleven occurrences left inside theme-light.css are Carbon's own v10-to-v11 alias layer, which the inventory records as deliberate and not the S5 defect. Names were kept, because 111 var() references live in .js files across 23 token names and a rename there fails silently - no build error, no console warning, just an unstyled element. The rule the refactor was built on: consolidation is not unification. Where two sheets declared the same value, they collapse. Where they declared DIFFERENT values for one role - the two shadows, the eight status borders doing four jobs, the three mono stacks - each value got its own canonical name and the pair is recorded for T3.5. Picking a winner between two near-identical greys is a rendered change, which this task forbids. The console's zebra stripe is the one that would have bitten: #fafafa is six points from #f4f4f4, and merging them erases the striping on the nine-column user table. Collecting the one-offs in one place made two things countable that were not before: twelve distinct shadows, and a ninth amber (#8a6d00 on the field view, four points from #8e6a00 and doing the same job - BL-009). VERIFICATION - the screenshot done-when could not do the job, so it was replaced. Captured against wave 2, 11 of 14 shots were pixel-identical and 3 were not. Capturing wave 2 against ITSELF produced the same 3 differences at the same bounding box, so those shots cannot distinguish a regression from the clock. Trap 2 in the brief is half wrong: users.html is stable at both widths; the unstable third is the creator at 1440px, and admin's captured page height varies by ~600px between runs (BL-012). So tests/token_check.py was added. It checks what wave 3 actually claims: that every custom property resolves to the same literal, and every element computes the same colours, shadows and type. That is stronger than a screenshot - it covers the hover, focus and disabled rules a screenshot never exercises, and it is deterministic. wave 2 vs T3.2, all 7 pages: 178/178 wave-2 token names resolve identically, +213 new 3,500 elements compute identically, zero added, zero removed 16 tokens differ in notation only (#fff -> #ffffff), which is the duplicate class this task existed to collapse Two detours worth not repeating: the element walk was first keyed by sibling index and reported 55 phantom differences on the SOP page, where three JS-injected overlays append in whichever order their async work finishes (BL-011); and the comparator now normalises notation before reporting, because otherwise it fails on its own success. f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES as expected. browser_check 71/71. ONE DONE-WHEN NOT MET, recorded rather than skipped: "no page stylesheet declares a raw color, spacing or type value". The colour half is met in full. 483 raw spacing values, 281 font-sizes and 65 radii remain inside rules, 492 of them in the creator. That is arithmetic, not effort: the creator's spacing is every integer from 1px to 14px, so no token exists that padding:9px 11px maps to without changing one of the numbers - and this task forbids changing a rendered value. The two requirements are mutually exclusive. Logged as BL-010 for T5.x and T7.1, where those pages are re-laid-out and the values get chosen again. New backlog: BL-009 (ninth amber), BL-010 (raw spacing/type in rules), BL-011 (overlay append race), BL-012 (unstable screenshot targets). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| b105135a98 |
T2.3 - B2: a breakpoint plan for the project switcher, not an ellipsis
"Micron EUV Cleanroom Enable 2667008" did not fit. The switcher capped the name
at 240px inside a 280px button, so the real project name was ellipsised to
"Micron EUV Clean..." on the one control whose job is to tell you which job you
are in - which is the failure this item exists to prevent.
The plan, now written into docs/reference/file-map.md so it is not re-litigated:
>= 1024px the full project NAME. Caps raised to 400px / 340px, which is
enough for a real name with no ellipsis.
< 1024px the project NUMBER alone, e.g. 2667008. Dropping the name beats
shortening it: short, stable, unambiguous.
The number is no longer prefixed to the name at wide widths. Real names already
end with their number, so the old format printed it twice - the test project
rendered as "2667008 - Micron EUV Cleanroom Enable 2667008".
The full name stays reachable at every width by three routes, none hover-only,
because the Field View is a touch surface:
- the drawer, which now shows the active project under its head, wrapping onto
as many lines as it needs and never truncated. This is the guaranteed route,
and it subscribes to ProjectData.onActiveChange so it does not go stale when
the launcher switches project without reloading.
- the switcher's title attribute, carrying the full number and name, which
surfaces on keyboard focus as well as hover.
- the switcher popover, which lists every project in full.
Crossing the breakpoint re-labels, so a resized window does not keep whichever
form was chosen at load.
Verified with the real long name at 390, 768, 1024 and 1440: nothing truncated
at any width (scrollWidth vs clientWidth, not by eye), and the drawer carries
the whole name at all four. T1.1 correctness holds - the switcher never reads
"Select a project" while a project is active.
f_items: F1-F5 FIXED, F3 still passing at all four widths with the wider
switcher. browser_check 71/71.
Wave 2 complete: one drawer on six pages, no flat strip, F2 resolved for real,
S4 closed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 4ace2afb1c |
Move user administration to its own page; add Project Super User
User accounts lived in the Admin Console, which is admins-only. Project admins
need to create the accounts on their own jobs without an app admin on the phone,
so accounts move to a new User Directory page and a new role carries the right.
server/auth.py, server/app.py
New permissions role `project_super_user`, between admin and project_admin:
everything a project admin may do, plus user administration SCOPED to the
projects they hold the role on. Four limits make it safe to hand out, all
enforced server-side:
* Scope comes from projects, not the job title. It resolves per membership
(managed_project_ids), so an ordinary account can hold it on one job via
ProjectMember.role, and a super user demoted on one job administers
nobody there. No projects, no authority.
* Account-level changes (password, disable, rename, permissions, delete)
require EXCLUSIVE scope: refused when the target is also on a project the
caller does not administer, because those changes are global. The
directory renders such rows read-only with the reason.
* No admin or super-user targets, and neither role can be granted by a
super user -- that is the line that stops it becoming app-wide control.
* PUT .../projects rebuilds only the caller's own slice; memberships on
projects they do not administer are left untouched. A payload that simply
omits them must not cut someone off a job the caller cannot see.
Creating requires naming at least one of your own projects: an account with
none would be one the creator instantly cannot manage.
/api/auth/users is now scoped rather than admin-only, and carries a per-row
`manageable` verdict plus the reason. Non-managers get a contact card only --
a project user has no business reading colleagues' login history. New
/api/auth/user-scope tells the page what it may offer. Administrative
password resets are now audited; they were the one account change that left
no trace. Settings, feature flags and the auto-add rule stay admin-only.
While here: one definition of "is a user manager", derived from the managed
set. An account-role-only version disagreed with the scoped one and locked
per-project super users out of routes they were entitled to.
html/users.html, html/users.js
The directory: three renderings from one page -- admin (everything), super
user (controls per row, read-only where scope is shared), everyone else (a
read-only directory of the people on their own projects).
html/console.css, html/console-util.js
Extracted from admin.html/admin.js so both console pages share them. A
divergent jsq() is an XSS and a divergent role list offers permissions the
server refuses, so neither may exist twice.
html/wp-sidenav.{js,css}
Global nav drawer, role-gated, carrying ?project= across links. Mounted on
the field view (which had no way to anywhere) plus both console pages.
No migration: users.role is already String(20) and the new value fits.
Verified: 93 scope/gate tests, 29 live HTTP tests through the real dependency
stack, 33 static JS checks. Not verified in a browser -- no JS engine on this
machine -- so users.html and field.html want one manual load.
server/smoketest.py still fails with 401s. Pre-existing: it has no login code,
so auth_gate refuses it. Confirmed unchanged by stashing this work.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
