b44afa7672541f2c525058c218ddc87162aea0fc
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c024cba844 |
T4.5/T4.6/T4.7 - S10/S11/S12: it announces, it is legible, focus is visible
Three small accessibility items, done together because they share one probe and
one measurement method. tests/a11y_check.py, 22 checks, all passing.
S10 — ANNOUNCEMENTS. The app had zero aria-live regions; login.html's
role="alert" / role="status" pair was the only correct example in the codebase.
Both toasts now take an optional kind and set the role BEFORE the text, because
assistive technology announces on the content change and a role applied after
describes the next message rather than this one. The sync badge announces
politely.
Admin banners are handled by a rule rather than by editing thirteen assignment
sites: a MutationObserver in console-util.js marks anything carrying `.bad` as
role=alert and everything else role=status. Thirteen edits is thirteen chances to
get it wrong, and any banner added later would have missed out. The probe checks
a banner created after load, which is the case that would have regressed.
S11 — CONTRAST. Re-measured rather than quoting either published figure, as the
file map asked. #8d8d8d is 3.32:1 on white, not "about 2.9:1" as the plan says;
console.css:103's 3.3:1 was right. On the shaded surfaces it is worse - 3.01:1 on
a success banner. --cds-text-helper (#6f6f6f) clears 4.5:1 on all seven
backgrounds the app actually paints, tightest 4.56:1.
Fixed once, in the token, so all three sheets inherit it. console.css's local
override is gone, as the task requires. Disabled text was repointed to
--cds-text-disabled rather than darkened with everything else: making disabled
text MORE legible makes a disabled control look enabled.
The probe measures against the background actually painted behind each element,
walking ancestors for the first non-transparent one - not an assumed white, which
is how "passes on paper" and "fails on the page" come to disagree.
S12 — FOCUS. An app-wide :focus-visible floor in theme-light.css at zero
specificity, so any component can still draw its own. Filled controls get an
explicit rule at class specificity: a blue ring inside a blue button measures
1.00:1, which is not a subtle problem but no indicator at all. console.css's
inset ring had exactly that defect on button.primary.
`outline: none` is down from six to one, and that one (.wpc-search-input) has its
replacement in the rule above it - the shell rings on :focus-within, and ringing
both would draw two rectangles.
TWO REAL DEFECTS THE PROBE FOUND that reading would not have:
- .wp-navbtn's ring is white, which is right on the near-black app bar and
invisible on the creator's white header. Same button, same class, two hosts,
1.00:1 on one of them.
- The comment drawer is translated off-screen when closed, and a transform
moves a thing without removing it from the tab order. Its name field,
textarea, Add button and close button were all still focusable: a keyboard
user could tab into a panel they could not see and could not tell they were
in. Now visibility:hidden while closed, with the transition delayed so it
still animates both ways.
The probe itself needed three corrections, each of which was a wrong answer
before it was a right one, and each worth knowing:
- focus emulation must be ON, or :focus-visible never matches in headless and
every element reports clean - a pass that means nothing.
- which surface a ring is drawn against depends on the offset the BROWSER uses,
not the one the stylesheet asked for. Chromium redraws a low-contrast author
ring in white at offset 0 on a filled control, which is more contrast than was
requested; measuring that against the parent scores it 1.00:1 and calls a
correct ring a defect.
- focus() on a hidden control does nothing, so the probe has to ask whether the
focus actually landed. A closed drawer still has layout; a bounding box is not
evidence that anyone can reach it.
Metric 7, aria-live regions: was 0 at wave 0, now 13 role/aria-live sites across
7 files.
browser_check 71/71, f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 4ace2afb1c |
Move user administration to its own page; add Project Super User
User accounts lived in the Admin Console, which is admins-only. Project admins
need to create the accounts on their own jobs without an app admin on the phone,
so accounts move to a new User Directory page and a new role carries the right.
server/auth.py, server/app.py
New permissions role `project_super_user`, between admin and project_admin:
everything a project admin may do, plus user administration SCOPED to the
projects they hold the role on. Four limits make it safe to hand out, all
enforced server-side:
* Scope comes from projects, not the job title. It resolves per membership
(managed_project_ids), so an ordinary account can hold it on one job via
ProjectMember.role, and a super user demoted on one job administers
nobody there. No projects, no authority.
* Account-level changes (password, disable, rename, permissions, delete)
require EXCLUSIVE scope: refused when the target is also on a project the
caller does not administer, because those changes are global. The
directory renders such rows read-only with the reason.
* No admin or super-user targets, and neither role can be granted by a
super user -- that is the line that stops it becoming app-wide control.
* PUT .../projects rebuilds only the caller's own slice; memberships on
projects they do not administer are left untouched. A payload that simply
omits them must not cut someone off a job the caller cannot see.
Creating requires naming at least one of your own projects: an account with
none would be one the creator instantly cannot manage.
/api/auth/users is now scoped rather than admin-only, and carries a per-row
`manageable` verdict plus the reason. Non-managers get a contact card only --
a project user has no business reading colleagues' login history. New
/api/auth/user-scope tells the page what it may offer. Administrative
password resets are now audited; they were the one account change that left
no trace. Settings, feature flags and the auto-add rule stay admin-only.
While here: one definition of "is a user manager", derived from the managed
set. An account-role-only version disagreed with the scoped one and locked
per-project super users out of routes they were entitled to.
html/users.html, html/users.js
The directory: three renderings from one page -- admin (everything), super
user (controls per row, read-only where scope is shared), everyone else (a
read-only directory of the people on their own projects).
html/console.css, html/console-util.js
Extracted from admin.html/admin.js so both console pages share them. A
divergent jsq() is an XSS and a divergent role list offers permissions the
server refuses, so neither may exist twice.
html/wp-sidenav.{js,css}
Global nav drawer, role-gated, carrying ?project= across links. Mounted on
the field view (which had no way to anywhere) plus both console pages.
No migration: users.role is already String(20) and the new value fits.
Verified: 93 scope/gate tests, 29 live HTTP tests through the real dependency
stack, 33 static JS checks. Not verified in a browser -- no JS engine on this
machine -- so users.html and field.html want one manual load.
server/smoketest.py still fails with 401s. Pre-existing: it has no login code,
so auth_gate refuses it. Confirmed unchanged by stashing this work.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
