Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
b83f2fd8d5 T9.3 - S6: one icon system - monochrome text glyphs, one meaning each
The set mixed colour emoji with dingbats, and the same glyph read as two
things partly BECAUSE emoji render as per-platform artwork. The system chosen:
monochrome text-presentation glyphs - the suite is classic-script vanilla HTML
with no bundler, so an SVG sprite or icon font is a new asset pipeline, while
text glyphs render through the same font stack as the words beside them. The
enforceable form of "renders identically on Windows, macOS and a tablet":
no emoji-range codepoint and no U+FE0F selector anywhere in UI source,
swept by the probe on every run.

Converted: green-check/red-cross emoji in the admin and users consoles to
checkmark/cross, no-entry to circled-slash (blocked/on hold), the lock to the
pencil already meaning "edit with a logged reason" on sign-offs, the star to
the diamond, the folder to the reference marker, the side nav's lightning to
the gear, and the WATCH glyph (U+231A - emoji-presentation BY DEFAULT per
Unicode) to a text-presentation clock face. Dropped where the label already
carried the meaning: lightning on Save & view, the camera on Add photo, the
page/frame pictograms on file rows (the filename is the label). Stale help
copy fixed while its emoji left: it still described the pre-T9.4 "Load
sample" and the pre-T7.10 "Usage Logs" locations.

The meaning-to-icon mapping is in docs/reference/tokens.md - one meaning per
glyph, one glyph per meaning, both directions asserted from the document
itself; the probe also sweeps every page for glyphs not in the approved set,
so an unmapped icon cannot creep in.

Verification (each probe run alone): NEW tests/icon_check.py 5/5.
Regressions: frame_check 38/38, files_check 36/36, a11y_check 22/22,
cards_check 44/44.

Items: S6

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 13:15:59 -07:00
4ace2afb1c Move user administration to its own page; add Project Super User
User accounts lived in the Admin Console, which is admins-only. Project admins
need to create the accounts on their own jobs without an app admin on the phone,
so accounts move to a new User Directory page and a new role carries the right.

server/auth.py, server/app.py
  New permissions role `project_super_user`, between admin and project_admin:
  everything a project admin may do, plus user administration SCOPED to the
  projects they hold the role on. Four limits make it safe to hand out, all
  enforced server-side:

    * Scope comes from projects, not the job title. It resolves per membership
      (managed_project_ids), so an ordinary account can hold it on one job via
      ProjectMember.role, and a super user demoted on one job administers
      nobody there. No projects, no authority.
    * Account-level changes (password, disable, rename, permissions, delete)
      require EXCLUSIVE scope: refused when the target is also on a project the
      caller does not administer, because those changes are global. The
      directory renders such rows read-only with the reason.
    * No admin or super-user targets, and neither role can be granted by a
      super user -- that is the line that stops it becoming app-wide control.
    * PUT .../projects rebuilds only the caller's own slice; memberships on
      projects they do not administer are left untouched. A payload that simply
      omits them must not cut someone off a job the caller cannot see.

  Creating requires naming at least one of your own projects: an account with
  none would be one the creator instantly cannot manage.

  /api/auth/users is now scoped rather than admin-only, and carries a per-row
  `manageable` verdict plus the reason. Non-managers get a contact card only --
  a project user has no business reading colleagues' login history. New
  /api/auth/user-scope tells the page what it may offer. Administrative
  password resets are now audited; they were the one account change that left
  no trace. Settings, feature flags and the auto-add rule stay admin-only.

  While here: one definition of "is a user manager", derived from the managed
  set. An account-role-only version disagreed with the scoped one and locked
  per-project super users out of routes they were entitled to.

html/users.html, html/users.js
  The directory: three renderings from one page -- admin (everything), super
  user (controls per row, read-only where scope is shared), everyone else (a
  read-only directory of the people on their own projects).

html/console.css, html/console-util.js
  Extracted from admin.html/admin.js so both console pages share them. A
  divergent jsq() is an XSS and a divergent role list offers permissions the
  server refuses, so neither may exist twice.

html/wp-sidenav.{js,css}
  Global nav drawer, role-gated, carrying ?project= across links. Mounted on
  the field view (which had no way to anywhere) plus both console pages.

No migration: users.role is already String(20) and the new value fits.

Verified: 93 scope/gate tests, 29 live HTTP tests through the real dependency
stack, 33 static JS checks. Not verified in a browser -- no JS engine on this
machine -- so users.html and field.html want one manual load.

server/smoketest.py still fails with 401s. Pre-existing: it has no login code,
so auth_gate refuses it. Confirmed unchanged by stashing this work.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 17:36:14 -07:00