df20b8f18d0fb2bbffc1619bef96a5b465357628
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 73da684b99 |
T10.4: remove the local password path entirely
Real deletion (D15's 'full replacement'), not a toggle. Okta is now the only credential this app accepts anywhere. Backend: - server/models.py: drop User.password_hash. - server/alembic/versions/1d60a608bb51_...: matching migration (op.drop_column, same plain-drop precedent as project_role/locked_until/etc.; downgrade re-adds it with server_default=''). - server/auth.py: remove hash_password/verify_password/password_problem/ MIN_PASSWORD_LEN/_COMMON_PASSWORDS, create_reset_token/decode_reset_token/ RESET_MINUTES, the bcrypt import. Roles/tokens/cookies/get_current_user untouched. - server/app.py: remove login(), the whole self-service reset-password block (forgot-password/reset-available/reset-password), and change_password() (POST /api/auth/password). Rework create_user() to drop the password field (with a docstring note: the username must exactly match the eventual Okta identity claim, or a later sign-in provisions a second account instead of matching this one). Remove admin_reset_password() outright - nothing left to reset. Fixes a bug this task's own predecessor left behind: okta_callback()'s JIT provisioning (T10.3) was still setting password_hash="", which would have raised TypeError the moment the column was actually dropped. Admin bootstrap (D16): server/manage_users.py moves from creating accounts (create/create-admin/reset-password, all password-based) to a single 'promote <username> --role <role>' command that changes the role on a row Okta's JIT provisioning already created - the documented path for naming the first admin. list/disable/enable unchanged. Frontend: html/users.js drops the password field and validation from createUser(), removes resetPw() and its button (nothing left to reset). html/users.html drops the #nu-password input, adds a tooltip on username explaining the exact-match-to-Okta requirement. html/auth-guard.js removes the wpChangePassword dialog; html/wp-sidenav.js removes the 'Password' menu item that opened it. Tests: tests/browser_check.py and tests/launcher_check.py stop hashing a password to seed fixture rows (and the --keep-server hint now prints a ready-to-use cookie-setting snippet instead of a dead username/password). tests/pipeline_check.py and tests/token_check.py drop an unused PW import. tests/console_dialogs_check.py: the admin password-reset dialog it drove no longer exists, so that scenario is removed - the prompt-with-validate() UI pattern it exercised is still covered via creator_dialogs_check.py's wp-creation-app.js call sites, noted in this file's docstring so the coverage move isn't silent. tests/url_state_check.py: the "next= survives a real sign-in via login" scenario is explicitly marked SKIPPED (not deleted, not faked) - that promise is specific to the login FORM this task removed and can't be honestly re-proven until T10.5 rebuilds it as an Okta redirect; a minted-token cookie now stands in as setup only, so scenarios 3-6 in that file still get a signed-in page to run against. server/smoketest.py and server/seed_demo.py: switched from POST /api/auth/login to minting a session the same way okta_callback() does (auth.create_token(), seeded into the cookie jar) rather than waiting on T10.7. This is a real operational change, documented in both files' own AUTHENTICATION sections: they now need to run where AUTH_SECRET_KEY and the database match the target server's (inside the api container, or local dev) - they can no longer sign in to an arbitrary remote URL from an unrelated workstation, because Okta requires a real browser and these are stdlib scripts. The account must already exist; neither script creates or promotes one. server/requirements.txt: bcrypt dropped, nothing imports it anymore. Verified: full Alembic chain (baseline through this migration) upgrades and downgrades cleanly against a throwaway SQLite DB. okta_callback() JIT provisioning re-tested against the post-migration schema (would have thrown before the password_hash="" fix above). create_user() verified via a live HTTP call with no password field. manage_users.py promote verified end to end (seed a JIT-shaped row at project_user, promote to admin, list). smoketest.py and seed_demo.py both run to completion against a live uvicorn instance using the new minted-session path - 25/25 checks, including logout actually invalidating the session (proving the cookie-jar seeding didn't just fake the sign-in, it preserved the real expiry mechanics). wave-10.md T10.4 / D15 / D16 |
|||
| 560f0cb3cc |
BL-024 - the last 21 native dialogs, onto the shared kit
S1 counted 79 native dialogs app-wide and its tasks removed 58; the audit found the rest on surfaces no S1 task named: admin.js (6), users.js (10), the launcher's inline script (5). All 21 now go through wp-dialog.js - the T7.9 kit extracted as a self-injecting shared component: markup and styles land on first use, styles are theme tokens only with its own wp-dlg-* class names (the consoles' existing .modal styles are untouched), 44px targets on coarse pointers, and the whole file is guarded so the creator's inline copy - which owns the same-id markup in its HTML - still wins on its own page. The kit's toast comes along (S10 role rules), since none of the three pages had one. Conversion follows the T7.9 precedent: confirms -> wpConfirmDialog with named ok-labels, the password prompt -> wpPromptDialog whose validate() finally enforces min-12 AT the input (it was label-text-only before, server-enforced), API failures with detail -> wpAlertDialog, small info/validation messages -> the announced toast. New probe console_dialogs_check (17): counts pinned at 0, kit guarded and loaded by all three pages, and the users console driven live with natives poisoned - reset a password end to end (short refused inline, good one accepted by the server and announced), cancel a delete and prove nothing died. Items: BL-024 (closed), S1 completed to zero app-wide, C1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| b83f2fd8d5 |
T9.3 - S6: one icon system - monochrome text glyphs, one meaning each
The set mixed colour emoji with dingbats, and the same glyph read as two things partly BECAUSE emoji render as per-platform artwork. The system chosen: monochrome text-presentation glyphs - the suite is classic-script vanilla HTML with no bundler, so an SVG sprite or icon font is a new asset pipeline, while text glyphs render through the same font stack as the words beside them. The enforceable form of "renders identically on Windows, macOS and a tablet": no emoji-range codepoint and no U+FE0F selector anywhere in UI source, swept by the probe on every run. Converted: green-check/red-cross emoji in the admin and users consoles to checkmark/cross, no-entry to circled-slash (blocked/on hold), the lock to the pencil already meaning "edit with a logged reason" on sign-offs, the star to the diamond, the folder to the reference marker, the side nav's lightning to the gear, and the WATCH glyph (U+231A - emoji-presentation BY DEFAULT per Unicode) to a text-presentation clock face. Dropped where the label already carried the meaning: lightning on Save & view, the camera on Add photo, the page/frame pictograms on file rows (the filename is the label). Stale help copy fixed while its emoji left: it still described the pre-T9.4 "Load sample" and the pre-T7.10 "Usage Logs" locations. The meaning-to-icon mapping is in docs/reference/tokens.md - one meaning per glyph, one glyph per meaning, both directions asserted from the document itself; the probe also sweeps every page for glyphs not in the approved set, so an unmapped icon cannot creep in. Verification (each probe run alone): NEW tests/icon_check.py 5/5. Regressions: frame_check 38/38, files_check 36/36, a11y_check 22/22, cards_check 44/44. Items: S6 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 4ace2afb1c |
Move user administration to its own page; add Project Super User
User accounts lived in the Admin Console, which is admins-only. Project admins
need to create the accounts on their own jobs without an app admin on the phone,
so accounts move to a new User Directory page and a new role carries the right.
server/auth.py, server/app.py
New permissions role `project_super_user`, between admin and project_admin:
everything a project admin may do, plus user administration SCOPED to the
projects they hold the role on. Four limits make it safe to hand out, all
enforced server-side:
* Scope comes from projects, not the job title. It resolves per membership
(managed_project_ids), so an ordinary account can hold it on one job via
ProjectMember.role, and a super user demoted on one job administers
nobody there. No projects, no authority.
* Account-level changes (password, disable, rename, permissions, delete)
require EXCLUSIVE scope: refused when the target is also on a project the
caller does not administer, because those changes are global. The
directory renders such rows read-only with the reason.
* No admin or super-user targets, and neither role can be granted by a
super user -- that is the line that stops it becoming app-wide control.
* PUT .../projects rebuilds only the caller's own slice; memberships on
projects they do not administer are left untouched. A payload that simply
omits them must not cut someone off a job the caller cannot see.
Creating requires naming at least one of your own projects: an account with
none would be one the creator instantly cannot manage.
/api/auth/users is now scoped rather than admin-only, and carries a per-row
`manageable` verdict plus the reason. Non-managers get a contact card only --
a project user has no business reading colleagues' login history. New
/api/auth/user-scope tells the page what it may offer. Administrative
password resets are now audited; they were the one account change that left
no trace. Settings, feature flags and the auto-add rule stay admin-only.
While here: one definition of "is a user manager", derived from the managed
set. An account-role-only version disagreed with the scoped one and locked
per-project super users out of routes they were entitled to.
html/users.html, html/users.js
The directory: three renderings from one page -- admin (everything), super
user (controls per row, read-only where scope is shared), everyone else (a
read-only directory of the people on their own projects).
html/console.css, html/console-util.js
Extracted from admin.html/admin.js so both console pages share them. A
divergent jsq() is an XSS and a divergent role list offers permissions the
server refuses, so neither may exist twice.
html/wp-sidenav.{js,css}
Global nav drawer, role-gated, carrying ?project= across links. Mounted on
the field view (which had no way to anywhere) plus both console pages.
No migration: users.role is already String(20) and the new value fits.
Verified: 93 scope/gate tests, 29 live HTTP tests through the real dependency
stack, 33 static JS checks. Not verified in a browser -- no JS engine on this
machine -- so users.html and field.html want one manual load.
server/smoketest.py still fails with 401s. Pre-existing: it has no login code,
so auth_gate refuses it. Confirmed unchanged by stashing this work.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
