df20b8f18d0fb2bbffc1619bef96a5b465357628
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 73da684b99 |
T10.4: remove the local password path entirely
Real deletion (D15's 'full replacement'), not a toggle. Okta is now the only credential this app accepts anywhere. Backend: - server/models.py: drop User.password_hash. - server/alembic/versions/1d60a608bb51_...: matching migration (op.drop_column, same plain-drop precedent as project_role/locked_until/etc.; downgrade re-adds it with server_default=''). - server/auth.py: remove hash_password/verify_password/password_problem/ MIN_PASSWORD_LEN/_COMMON_PASSWORDS, create_reset_token/decode_reset_token/ RESET_MINUTES, the bcrypt import. Roles/tokens/cookies/get_current_user untouched. - server/app.py: remove login(), the whole self-service reset-password block (forgot-password/reset-available/reset-password), and change_password() (POST /api/auth/password). Rework create_user() to drop the password field (with a docstring note: the username must exactly match the eventual Okta identity claim, or a later sign-in provisions a second account instead of matching this one). Remove admin_reset_password() outright - nothing left to reset. Fixes a bug this task's own predecessor left behind: okta_callback()'s JIT provisioning (T10.3) was still setting password_hash="", which would have raised TypeError the moment the column was actually dropped. Admin bootstrap (D16): server/manage_users.py moves from creating accounts (create/create-admin/reset-password, all password-based) to a single 'promote <username> --role <role>' command that changes the role on a row Okta's JIT provisioning already created - the documented path for naming the first admin. list/disable/enable unchanged. Frontend: html/users.js drops the password field and validation from createUser(), removes resetPw() and its button (nothing left to reset). html/users.html drops the #nu-password input, adds a tooltip on username explaining the exact-match-to-Okta requirement. html/auth-guard.js removes the wpChangePassword dialog; html/wp-sidenav.js removes the 'Password' menu item that opened it. Tests: tests/browser_check.py and tests/launcher_check.py stop hashing a password to seed fixture rows (and the --keep-server hint now prints a ready-to-use cookie-setting snippet instead of a dead username/password). tests/pipeline_check.py and tests/token_check.py drop an unused PW import. tests/console_dialogs_check.py: the admin password-reset dialog it drove no longer exists, so that scenario is removed - the prompt-with-validate() UI pattern it exercised is still covered via creator_dialogs_check.py's wp-creation-app.js call sites, noted in this file's docstring so the coverage move isn't silent. tests/url_state_check.py: the "next= survives a real sign-in via login" scenario is explicitly marked SKIPPED (not deleted, not faked) - that promise is specific to the login FORM this task removed and can't be honestly re-proven until T10.5 rebuilds it as an Okta redirect; a minted-token cookie now stands in as setup only, so scenarios 3-6 in that file still get a signed-in page to run against. server/smoketest.py and server/seed_demo.py: switched from POST /api/auth/login to minting a session the same way okta_callback() does (auth.create_token(), seeded into the cookie jar) rather than waiting on T10.7. This is a real operational change, documented in both files' own AUTHENTICATION sections: they now need to run where AUTH_SECRET_KEY and the database match the target server's (inside the api container, or local dev) - they can no longer sign in to an arbitrary remote URL from an unrelated workstation, because Okta requires a real browser and these are stdlib scripts. The account must already exist; neither script creates or promotes one. server/requirements.txt: bcrypt dropped, nothing imports it anymore. Verified: full Alembic chain (baseline through this migration) upgrades and downgrades cleanly against a throwaway SQLite DB. okta_callback() JIT provisioning re-tested against the post-migration schema (would have thrown before the password_hash="" fix above). create_user() verified via a live HTTP call with no password field. manage_users.py promote verified end to end (seed a JIT-shaped row at project_user, promote to admin, list). smoketest.py and seed_demo.py both run to completion against a live uvicorn instance using the new minted-session path - 25/25 checks, including logout actually invalidating the session (proving the cookie-jar seeding didn't just fake the sign-in, it preserved the real expiry mechanics). wave-10.md T10.4 / D15 / D16 |
|||
| 9ab7b48de2 |
T3.2 - C3/S5: one source of truth for colour; page sheets alias only
theme-light.css is now the only file in html/ that contains a colour literal. The five page stylesheets and all four inline <style> blocks declare names and nothing else. theme-light.css 191 declarations, 175 with a literal value console.css 28 declarations, 0 work-package-suite-styles.css 16 declarations, 0 wp-chrome.css 14 declarations, 0 wp-creation-styles.css 24 declarations, 0 wp-sidenav.css 0 declarations, 0 #0f62fe is declared in one sheet, down from five. The eleven occurrences left inside theme-light.css are Carbon's own v10-to-v11 alias layer, which the inventory records as deliberate and not the S5 defect. Names were kept, because 111 var() references live in .js files across 23 token names and a rename there fails silently - no build error, no console warning, just an unstyled element. The rule the refactor was built on: consolidation is not unification. Where two sheets declared the same value, they collapse. Where they declared DIFFERENT values for one role - the two shadows, the eight status borders doing four jobs, the three mono stacks - each value got its own canonical name and the pair is recorded for T3.5. Picking a winner between two near-identical greys is a rendered change, which this task forbids. The console's zebra stripe is the one that would have bitten: #fafafa is six points from #f4f4f4, and merging them erases the striping on the nine-column user table. Collecting the one-offs in one place made two things countable that were not before: twelve distinct shadows, and a ninth amber (#8a6d00 on the field view, four points from #8e6a00 and doing the same job - BL-009). VERIFICATION - the screenshot done-when could not do the job, so it was replaced. Captured against wave 2, 11 of 14 shots were pixel-identical and 3 were not. Capturing wave 2 against ITSELF produced the same 3 differences at the same bounding box, so those shots cannot distinguish a regression from the clock. Trap 2 in the brief is half wrong: users.html is stable at both widths; the unstable third is the creator at 1440px, and admin's captured page height varies by ~600px between runs (BL-012). So tests/token_check.py was added. It checks what wave 3 actually claims: that every custom property resolves to the same literal, and every element computes the same colours, shadows and type. That is stronger than a screenshot - it covers the hover, focus and disabled rules a screenshot never exercises, and it is deterministic. wave 2 vs T3.2, all 7 pages: 178/178 wave-2 token names resolve identically, +213 new 3,500 elements compute identically, zero added, zero removed 16 tokens differ in notation only (#fff -> #ffffff), which is the duplicate class this task existed to collapse Two detours worth not repeating: the element walk was first keyed by sibling index and reported 55 phantom differences on the SOP page, where three JS-injected overlays append in whichever order their async work finishes (BL-011); and the comparator now normalises notation before reporting, because otherwise it fails on its own success. f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES as expected. browser_check 71/71. ONE DONE-WHEN NOT MET, recorded rather than skipped: "no page stylesheet declares a raw color, spacing or type value". The colour half is met in full. 483 raw spacing values, 281 font-sizes and 65 radii remain inside rules, 492 of them in the creator. That is arithmetic, not effort: the creator's spacing is every integer from 1px to 14px, so no token exists that padding:9px 11px maps to without changing one of the numbers - and this task forbids changing a rendered value. The two requirements are mutually exclusive. Logged as BL-010 for T5.x and T7.1, where those pages are re-laid-out and the values get chosen again. New backlog: BL-009 (ninth amber), BL-010 (raw spacing/type in rules), BL-011 (overlay append race), BL-012 (unstable screenshot targets). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
