e0008670fcf40439662fc535f19c5dd651d593ec
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b44afa7672 |
T9.4 - S7: one sample-data affordance, confirmed, and fenced off the project
Four affordances under three names became ONE: "Load sample data", on the creator's toolbar, at the far end of two separators from the live actions (New / Duplicate), pushed right with its own gap. It confirms through the T7.9 dialog, naming exactly what it does - and what it does not: "This page only: nothing is written to the project unless you then save." The probe verifies the fence the way the done-when demands - against a REAL project, reading the server's SOP and work-package list before and after and asserting byte-identical. Gone: the wizard's header "Load sample" (the dangerous one: it filled the state completeSOP() pushes to the LIVE project, one click, no confirm, no undo - reconciled with D1 exactly as the task records: the creator's control is the survivor, the wizard copy goes), the creator's split Sample SOP / Load example pair (now internals behind the one entry point), and the empty-state context bar's third button (its text now points at the toolbar control). The location/material "Load sample values" buttons stay: they fill a PASTE BOX that acts only through an explicit, dry-runnable import - a different thing, stated in the code. Probes re-pointed with reasons in place: frame_check's D1 toolbar list names the consolidated control; validation_check's sample-driven toast checks became the-affordance-is-gone checks (and its stale showAnalytics drive, orphaned by T7.10, became a the-duplicate-stays-gone check). Verification (each probe run alone): NEW tests/sample_check.py 10/10. Regressions: validation_check 77/77, frame_check 38/38, kitting_check 26/26, export_check 20/20, sections_check 95/95. Items: S7 (D1 reconciliation honored) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 12d19446d5 |
T7.1 - B7: dissolve the creator iframe, and D1 give it back its sample data
There is no iframe in html/ any more. The creator is a top-level document with
the same app bar and the same tab strip as the SOP wizard; the two tabs that
used to swap a frame are links between them.
DEVIATION, stated rather than smuggled. The wave file says "remove the iframe
boundary so the creator renders in the parent document". It renders as its own
document instead. Every done-when is met - no iframe, no cross-frame messaging,
F4 resolved structurally, CR-006 toggles with no special-casing, back and
forward intact with T4.2's URL state - but the route is the other one, and the
reason is in creator-frame.md's own numbers:
merge into parent make it a page
selector collisions to resolve 21 0
script global collisions 9 0
cross-frame call sites to remove 28 28
probe entry points needing rework ~29 2
The 21 and the 9 were never the cost of dissolving the boundary. They are the
cost of MERGING TWO DOCUMENTS, which is a different change the boundary was
hiding. And 29 probe call sites address wp-creation-index.html directly, so a
route that keeps that address keeps all of them. creator-frame.md section 5
records this in full.
What went, and what replaced it:
#wp-frame, applyEmbedLayout, sizeWPFrame, viewportMinusChrome, chromeHeight,
renderWPTab, the resize handler, the ResizeObserver, --wp-chrome-h,
.content-area.embed-full, body.embed-full -> the window sizes the page
?embedded=1, body.embedded, .embed-hide, .embed-first -> nothing. An old
link carrying the param is ignored rather than half-obeyed.
openWpById / showDashboard / showForm / dashApplyFlag / applySopSections
called across the frame -> the URL. ?project= ?view= ?wp= ?flag= were
already read at the creator's own boot (T4.2), which is exactly why those four
could be DELETED rather than migrated. X4 is closed: the surviving path is the
one T5.5 built and proved.
inIframe in auth-guard.js, wp-chrome.js, wp-sidenav.js, help.js and _isTop in
project-data.js -> gone. help.js now reads the explicit WP_HELP_NO_FAB flag
both tool pages set, instead of inferring intent from where it is rendered.
.main-nav / .nav-tab in work-package-suite-styles.css -> wp-chrome.css,
because a tab row only one of two documents can style is the shape that put
the tabs in the parent and the toolbar in the child to begin with.
The three questions creator-frame.md section 4 said no count could answer:
1. The creator gets the app bar. It was the only page loading neither
wp-chrome file. Its header is now the .header-left / .header-right pair the
wizard uses, so the switcher lands in the same place on both.
2. Two sequence components, scoped not merged - confirmed Aug 18 that the
sequence is authored in the SOP and adjustable per package. BL-015 stays.
3. body.embedded is gone. The header it hid is replaced by the app bar; the
sample controls are visible in a new package toolbar (D1); the analytics
button is visible there until T7.10 moves it. The Dashboard BUTTON in that
row became a TAB, which is the one place B7's "fold the toolbar into the
tab row" actually happened.
Old addresses still resolve. ?tab=wp, ?view=dashboard and ?wp=<id> are in
bookmarks, in wp-sidenav's link map, and they are the shape CR-011 and CR-014
were specified against (X1). The wizard forwards them with replace(), so Back
does not bounce. Breaking these silently was the one regression this task could
have shipped that nobody would notice for weeks. frame_check.py section 4 pins
all three.
BEHAVIOUR CHANGE, deliberate. The live cross-frame hand-off showed the creator a
section toggle that had NOT been saved: flip it, look, reload, and the section
came back. What the creator shows now is the SOP that is stored. sections_check
5b pins both halves - an unsaved toggle does not travel, a saved one does.
BEHAVIOUR CHANGE, not deliberate, logged as BL-020. A tab switch is a page exit
now, so leaving the wizard with unsaved SOP edits fires T4.3's unsaved-work
guard. Nothing is lost - the guard writes the draft first and T4.3 recovers it -
but it is friction that did not exist, and suppressing a deliberate guard is a
product decision with its own downside. Logged, not quietly handled here.
tests/frame_check.py, 39 checks, new. Two of them exist because of failures
during this task rather than in it:
- "both documents parse and boot". A const shadowing a function parameter is a
SyntaxError, and work-package-suite-app.js did not parse at all for one run.
Four checks in url_state_check went red and not one said "the script did not
load". Asserting a page's own entry points exist costs nothing.
- "focus emulation is on, so a focus reading means something". An earlier draft
called page.call instead of page.ws.call inside a try/except and measured
nothing, reporting no focus ring anywhere - which looks exactly like a
finding. Trap 5 in reverse, for the second time in this project.
The four backlog entries logged against this file, re-measured rather than
assumed:
BL-001 still reproduces (485px in a 390px viewport) but its RECORDED CAUSE IS
WRONG. --nav-w now computes to 56px, so the injected-style explanation
is spent. The overflow is the creator's data tables - #asset-body's
lays out at 520px with no scroll container. frame_check reports the
offending boxes by selector and skips position:fixed subtrees, because
the comments drawer parked off-screen at right:844 made the first
measurement blame the drawer. Pinned, not fixed: T7.2 lays out the form.
BL-013 CLOSED. It was fixed by S12 in WAVE 4 - wp-creation-styles.css:209
carries the comment naming this entry - and nobody updated it. It was
quoted as a live CLAUDE.md violation while planning wave 7 and had not
been true for four waves. a11y_check walks 120 focusable elements on
the creator and every one rings at >= 3:1.
BL-006 15 by the probe's measure, unchanged; different denominator, stated.
BL-007 68 raw radii by the probe's measure. Nothing has reduced it in four
waves; it is measured every run now instead of once.
BL-018 cost a FOURTH probe. frame_check imports set_sop from sections_check
rather than writing a fifth copy of the workaround. T9.9 owns it.
Probes re-pointed, with reasons in the files: sections_check 5b (drove the live
hand-off), pipeline_check check 2 (read through contentDocument), f_items F4
(drove standalone and embedded; there is one mode now), validation_check
(lost "the wrong tab", gained the SOP gate).
Verified: frame_check 39/39, sections_check 95/95, pipeline_check 44/44,
url_state_check 23/23, validation_check 83/83, a11y_check 22/22,
autosave_check 34/34, aggregates_check 16/16, stepper_check 71/71,
browser_check 71/71, launcher_check 58/58, generalinfo_check 49/49,
rollup_check 63/63, cards_check 44/44, locations_check 58/58.
f_items: F1-F5 fixed, F6 reproduces (T7.2).
Metrics: iframes 1 -> 0, colour literals in rules outside theme-light.css 0,
dialogs 64, <div onclick> 2, .help-tip 18.
Items: B7 D1
Task: T7.1
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 55caefb099 |
T5.8 - S1 (wizard): errors at the field, and the last dialog is gone
S1 has two halves and they are easy to conflate.
One is that validation was a native dialog: "Please complete all required
fields: Project Name, Number, Client, Division, and Site Location." names five
fields at once, highlights none of them, and scrolls nowhere. The other is that
validateStep guarded steps 1, 5 and 6 while the MARKUP marks required fields on
1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 - so two steps' asterisks meant nothing at all, which is worse
than no asterisk.
Both fixed, and the second is the one worth measuring: the probe reads the
required-field list out of work-package-suite.html rather than out of STEP_GATES,
because a probe that read the table would agree with whatever the table says and
prove nothing. Both notations count - an asterisk in a <label>, and the red span
beside step 3's role titles.
Now: an error per FIELD, rendered at it, associated by aria-describedby, marked
aria-invalid, announced through role="alert", and the first one focused and
scrolled into view. The error boxes are BUILT from the gate table rather than
written into the markup twelve times - adding a required field is one row, and
its error element, its association and its announcement all follow. A
markup-side error box somebody forgets to add is an error nobody ever sees.
An error clears as you type rather than on the next submit. An error still
showing over a field you have just corrected teaches people to ignore errors.
And nothing paints a step you have not tried to leave: the rail asks
stepGateMet(), which reads the same fields and marks none of them.
The thirteen dialogs
Every one is now the thing it should have been - an error at the field it is
about, or an announcement in a live region with the role T4.5 established:
errors interrupt, confirmations do not.
A dialog is not merely ugly. It blocks the page, cannot be placed or styled, a
screen reader can present it only as a modal interruption, and it is one OK
button whatever it says - so "sample data loaded" and "you cannot do that"
arrived identically.
Two deserve naming. The empty-comment alert became an inline error on the
feedback textarea. And showAnalytics() was a confirm() carrying the entire
usage summary as its body - a wall of text in a dialog whose only dismissal
was also the download button. The summary is the useful part, so it is shown,
with the download offered as an action beside it. That function has no caller
in the wizard's markup (the "Usage data" button is the creator's, calling the
creator's own showAnalytics), and it was converted rather than deleted:
deleting a feature is not what this task was asked to do, and its dialog
counted toward the number this task has to drive to zero.
html/work-package-suite.html #wp-toast, an error box on the textarea
html/work-package-suite-app.js STEP_GATES widened; per-field messages;
ensureErrorBoxes; wizardToast; 13 removals
html/work-package-suite-styles.css .wp-toast
tests/validation_check.py new - 81 checks
tests/stepper_check.py its "the alert T5.8 still owns" check now
asserts the opposite, by name
Done when
[x] every step with required fields validates them - 5 steps, from the markup
[x] each error renders at its field and is associated via aria-describedby
[x] submitting an invalid step focuses AND scrolls to the first error
(scroll checked by bounding box, not by trusting scrollIntoView)
[x] errors announce to screen readers
[x] the wizard's native dialog count is 0
The count, recorded both ways because BL-017 says the metric counts prose
work-package-suite-app.js 0 raw, 0 with comments stripped
app-wide 64 raw, 64 stripped, against wave 0's 79
wp-creation-app.js 43 (wave 7), users.js 10 and
admin.js 6 and index.html 5 (wave 9)
The wizard contributes none of what is left, which the probe asserts rather
than leaving to the total.
Verified one at a time
validation_check 81/81 new
stepper_check 71/71
sections_check 88/88
browser_check 71/71
a11y 22/22
url_state 23/23
autosave 34/34
locations 58/58
aggregates 16/16
pipeline 43/43
launcher 58/58
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
No colour literal added. The toast says "error" by a red rule AND by staying
until dismissed where a confirmation times out - two channels, not one (C1).
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: step 3's two role TITLES are validated
because the markup marks them required, but the two role NAME pickers beside
them are not marked and so are not gated. A sign-off role with nobody in it is
arguably the more useful thing to catch. The markup is what was built to; if the
intent was the names, that is two rows in STEP_GATES.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
