# Decisions — 2026-09-03 ## D16: Okta admin bootstrap, break-glass posture, and the real scope of T10.4 Raised during hazard review for T10.4 (remove the local password path). D15 settled *that* local passwords go away and Okta OIDC is the sole replacement; it did not settle how an admin account gets named once there is no password to set, or what happens if Okta itself is unreachable. Both are decided here. ### Admin bootstrap `server/manage_users.py` stays the bootstrap tool — its own docstring already says so ("the `/api/auth/users` endpoint needs an existing admin, so you have to bootstrap one here") — but it changes from *creating* an account to *promoting* one: - An operator with shell/DB access on the server runs it against an account that already signed in through Okta once and was JIT-provisioned by T10.3 (landing at `project_user`, per that task). The command sets `role = admin` on that existing row by username. - It does **not** create a `User` row from scratch and does not touch `password_hash` (the column is gone after T10.4's migration). Rejected: minting a brand-new admin row by hand-typed username. `OKTA_IDENTITY_CLAIM`'s exact format is still unconfirmed by security (open item carried from D15/wave-10.md). A hand-typed username that doesn't exactly match what Okta actually sends produces a second, orphaned account instead of promoting the real one. Promoting an already-JIT-provisioned row sidesteps that entirely — it never has to guess the future claim value. Ongoing (non-bootstrap) admin naming needs no new work: `html/users.js` already has a live role dropdown (`roleSelect`, gated by server-supplied `grantable_roles`) that lets an existing admin promote any other account, including one JIT-provisioned via Okta. That path is unrelated to the password removal and keeps working unchanged. ### Break glass No break-glass path, by design. If Okta is unreachable or misconfigured, the app is unreachable for everyone, including admins, until Okta is restored. This matches the precedent already on record for the abandoned LDAPS design (D13/D14): "LDAPS is the *only* path, no local fallback, no break-glass." Carried forward deliberately rather than assumed to still apply, given Okta's failure modes differ from an internal LDAP bind — considered and confirmed, not defaulted into. Rejected: a toggleable emergency local login gated behind an env flag. It would reintroduce a stored local credential, exactly what D15 exists to eliminate, for a scenario (Okta down) judged less likely and less costly than the standing risk of a forgotten emergency backdoor. The server-shell CLI (`manage_users.py`, promoting an existing row) is not a formal break-glass mechanism — it cannot help if no account has ever signed in through Okta — but it is the same trust tier as "someone with SSH/container access to prod could already edit the database directly," and it costs no new engineering. ### T10.4 scope correction Hazard review found real call sites of `hash_password` / `verify_password` / `password_problem` that the original T10.4 bullet in `wave-10.md` didn't name and that break the moment those functions are deleted: - `create_user()` and `admin_reset_password()` in `server/app.py` (the admin console's "add user" and "reset password" routes). - `html/users.js`'s "add user" form (`nu-password` field) and "Reset password" button. - `server/manage_users.py`'s `create`, `create-admin`, and `reset-password` subcommands (see bootstrap section above for its replacement). - `tests/browser_check.py` and `tests/launcher_check.py`, which call `auth.hash_password()` to seed fixture rows. Also found: `server/smoketest.py` and `server/seed_demo.py` authenticate via `POST /api/auth/login`, which T10.4 removes, and CLAUDE.md's own verification section names both scripts as required checks. Fix folded into T10.4 rather than deferred to T10.7: both scripts switch to minting a session with `auth.create_token()` and setting the cookie directly, the same technique `tests/browser_check.py` already uses instead of scripting a login form. No live Okta tenant needed, and T10.4 no longer depends on T10.7's timing. `wave-10.md`'s T10.4 bullet is updated to reflect this full scope.