n.siegfried
454bfa0fe1
docs/reference/completion.md walks every item: the 55 from IMPLEMENTATION.md section 6 and the 10 from decisions-2026-08-18.md. For each: status, the task that delivered it, the probe that re-verifies it on every run, and every deviation from written acceptance criteria - B7's page-not-merge (measured), CR-014's email body (the no-customer-IP rule won), CR-008's merge-vs-list (recommended, not decided), F6's 2.17-vs-2.0 (BL-022), S1's residual 21 dialogs (BL-024). The four out-of-scope items are confirmed unbuilt - two of them by probes that grep for their fields on every run. Section 8's outstanding inputs are restated (the material workbook and the B100 list still have not arrived; both upload paths are ready). The follow-ups for the next revision are in one place, including three product questions raised in commit messages along the way and the acceptance criteria that turned out wrong, for calibration. One item in the whole plan is knowingly open: S13 (seed_demo sign-in), carried with a reason, and F6's last number awaits a product answer. Wave 9 exit criteria: seven of seven, ticked with their verifying probes. Items: all Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>