Staging is not the pain; the last fifty feet are - the correct floor lay-down,
shark cage or conduit tree instead of material picked at will by whoever is
closest. The Kitting & MIMO section gains:
- Delivery Building / Floor / Sector: the SAME dependent pickers CR-004 built,
through the same fillLocSelect (which learned an optional field-map instead
of being copied), reading the same project location lists, storing PATHS.
A parallel free-text location vocabulary is exactly what CR-004 removed;
none was added.
- A free-text detail field for the specifics ("Shark cage 7, conduit tree C"),
persisted as delivDetail.
- deliveryLoc, the composed display string (labels off the shared lists, then
the detail after a dash) - which is what the CR-011 email already reads
(kitting_body preferred deliveryLoc from day one, with mimoLoc as the
pre-CR-012 fallback) and what the package printout now carries as its own
Delivery Location row.
Verification (each probe run alone): kitting_check.py extended to 26/26 (the
delivery selects are asserted to offer the SAME option list as the CR-004
trio, values persist as paths, the printout carries the composed value);
kitting_notify_check 17/17 now asserting the mail carries CR-012's composed
value, not the fallback. Regression: locations_check 58/58.
Items: CR-012
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
n.siegfried
b9d5f8ef92