Integrates Cody Schaefer's 7ef1fcd (written against pre-R2 main) per Nick's
instruction of Aug 20. The catalog lookup arrives whole: read-only /api/assets
backed by server/assets_db.py (one SELECT, env-only MICRON_DB_URL, 503-not-500
when broken, driver errors logged not propagated), the searchable picker with
CSV import and Excel column paste, catalog rows badged and locked to the DB's
casing, manual rows visibly unvouched, and graceful absent/unreachable states.
Three conflicts, resolved as unions of both sides' intent; the adaptations and
their reasons are recorded in docs/waves/decisions-2026-08-20.md:
- renderPackage: Cody's two-column asset table inside T9.1's sectioned
add('assets', ...) frame, so the CR-006 toggle keeps governing the export.
- bootData: initAssetPicker() joins the R2 loads instead of replacing them.
- The asset card: his picker UI, plus role=status on the source note (C1).
- Six imported alert() calls converted to the creator's idioms: file errors
through toast(msg,'alert') as the drawings uploader does; the instructional
and summary messages through the T7.9 kit, which gains the one-button
wpAlertDialog shape (BL-024's console conversions will want it too).
New probe: assets_check (27) - read-only structurally, unconfigured/broken as
first-class states, no credential echo, search ranking, casing canonicalisation,
import fallback + dedup, kit-not-native summary. One sections_check pin
re-pointed with the reason in code: normaliseAsset now stamps legacy rows
source:'manual' on load, so the CR-016 check compares content, not bytes.
Battery after merge: assets_check 27/27, creator_dialogs_check 20/20,
sections_check ALL PASS, export_check 20/20, helptip_check 13/13,
mobile_check 24/24, icon_check 5/5, color_check 5/5, form_structure_check
50/51 (the one red is BL-022, unchanged, deliberate).
Item: D11 (new scope, new id per the working rules). Out-of-scope note in
completion.md amended - 'no integration code exists' was true when written.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/reference/completion.md walks every item: the 55 from IMPLEMENTATION.md
section 6 and the 10 from decisions-2026-08-18.md. For each: status, the task
that delivered it, the probe that re-verifies it on every run, and every
deviation from written acceptance criteria - B7's page-not-merge (measured),
CR-014's email body (the no-customer-IP rule won), CR-008's merge-vs-list
(recommended, not decided), F6's 2.17-vs-2.0 (BL-022), S1's residual 21
dialogs (BL-024).
The four out-of-scope items are confirmed unbuilt - two of them by probes
that grep for their fields on every run. Section 8's outstanding inputs are
restated (the material workbook and the B100 list still have not arrived;
both upload paths are ready). The follow-ups for the next revision are in one
place, including three product questions raised in commit messages along the
way and the acceptance criteria that turned out wrong, for calibration.
One item in the whole plan is knowingly open: S13 (seed_demo sign-in),
carried with a reason, and F6's last number awaits a product answer.
Wave 9 exit criteria: seven of seven, ticked with their verifying probes.
Items: all
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
