Project-SDE-WP-Suite/docs/reference/completion.md

Completion — the R2 plan, reconciled (T9.7, 2026-08-19)

All 65 items accounted for: the 55 in IMPLEMENTATION.md §6 and the 10 in docs/waves/decisions-2026-08-18.md. Delivery references are task ids; the branch is local-only by instruction (one task = one commit, ids in every commit message), so the commit history IS the PR trail. Verification counts name the probe that re-checks the item on every run.

Change requests

Item	Status	Delivered by	Notes / deviations
CR-001	built	T6.1 (generalinfo_check 49)
CR-002	built	waves 1–2, field toggles T5.7; applied to the export at T9.1	the Micron samples now name costCode:false, acumaticaTask:false
CR-003	built	T6.2	three priorities, escalating order
CR-004	built	T6.3 (locations_check, rollup_check)	paths, not labels
CR-005	built	T5.4	upload path; B100 list still not supplied (§8)
CR-006	built	T5.7 (sections_check 95)	hidden, never deleted — pinned
CR-007	built	T7.7 (files_check 36)	D8 numbers enforced server-side; offline verified against a killed server
CR-008	built	T9.1 (export_check 20)	deviation raised, not decided: merge-vs-list — recommendation is inline images + listed PDFs; merged-PDF output needs Nick
CR-009	built	T8.1 (kitting_check)	statuses adopted as proposed; kitting off for Micron EUV by toggle
CR-010	built	T8.2	owner on the PACKAGE (confirmed Aug 18), account-backed, orphan-safe
CR-011	built	T8.3 (kitting_notify_check 17)	coalesced; T7.6 gate reused; sink-verified
CR-012	built	T8.4	shared location lists + detail field; prints and mails
CR-013	built	T8.5 (mreq_check 19)	lightweight scope exactly; fences grepped
CR-014	built	T7.6 (qa_gate_check 40)	deviation, stated in the commit: the email body omits location/scope — the done-when's no-customer-IP rule outranked the Do-paragraph; fuller body needs Nick
CR-015	built	T7.3 (hold_check 50)	root cause stated (both halves); regression test specific to clear-last-constraint
CR-016	built	T5.7
CR-017	guarded	T9.2	present, optional, rolls up; BL-023 logs the productivity factor
CR-018	built	T6.4 (rollup_check 63)

Findings and structural items

Item	Status	Delivered by	Notes
F1–F5	built	waves 1–3
F6	built, one number open	T7.2 (5,399 → 1,954px)	BL-022: 2.17 screens vs the strict 2.0 encoding of “roughly two” — product call, check stays red
S1	built	T5.8 wizard, T7.9 creator (creator_dialogs_check 20)	79 → 21 dialogs; the 21 live on surfaces no S1 task named — BL-024
S2–S5, S9–S12	built	waves 2–5
S6	built	T9.3 (icon_check 5)	one monochrome system, mapped in tokens.md
S7	built	T9.4 (sample_check 10)	one affordance, confirmed, fenced — verified against a real project
S8	built	T9.5 (helptip_check 13)	20 badges → buttons; closed BL-001
S13	open	—	seed_demo.py still does not sign in; the smoke test does. Carried to the next revision
A1	preserved	T7.3	confirmEarlyRelease() by name; async now, same contract
A2	built	T7.4 (warning_check 17)	one warning; the count on the sticky rail
A3–A5, A7	built	waves 1–6	localization re-verified through T7.10's admin edits (cards_check)
A6	built	T7.5 (triage_check 16)
B1–B5	built	waves 2–5
B6	built	T7.8 (sticky_bar_check 12)
B7	built	T7.1 (frame_check 38)	deviation, stated in the commit: the creator became its own page rather than merging into the parent — measured trade (0 collisions vs 21+9)
C1	audited	T9.5 (accessibility-audit.md)	every metric probe-backed
C2	audited	T9.6 (mobile_check 24)	screenshots committed beside the wave 0 baseline
C3	built	wave 3
C4	built	wave 4 interim, T9.9 full (color_check 4)	zero literals outside theme-light.css

The August 18 decisions

Item	Status	Delivered by
D1	built	T7.1 (sample controls visible; consolidated at T9.4 per the S7 reconciliation)
D2	built	T7.6 (QA group on the SOP wizard)
D3	built	T7.2 (rail + collapse; the "at rest" amendment recorded)
D4	built	T7.3 (Urgent surfaces the audited path; the override names what it crosses)
D5	built	T7.10 (one analytics core; admin report)
D6	built	T8.6 (material list, the CR-005 pattern, one shared component)
D7	built	T9.8 (archived_check 15)
D8	built	T7.7 (5MB / PDF+image / 2GB, 80% warning)
D9	built	T7.6 (Field View text pill at 390px)
D10	built	T7.6 / reused T8.3 (stored setting, admin-only, audited, sink-verified)

Out of scope, confirmed unbuilt

• Parts catalog / live inventory / warehouse integration — mreq_check and materials_check grep the model and the diff for stock/inventory/price fields on every run; none exist. D6's uploaded list is project-scoped data entry, not a catalog.
• Asset database integration — the assets section stays a CR-006 toggle (off on the Micron sample); no integration code exists.
• CxAlloy integration — CR-014 is notification-only, as the task footnote ordered; the platforms block stores names and URLs, nothing calls them.
• P6 activity import — CR-001 renders the two fields; nothing imports.

Outstanding inputs (IMPLEMENTATION.md §8, restated)

• Nate's spreadsheet and the master material workbook: still not supplied. D6 built the upload path so their arrival is a paste, not a build.
• The real B100 floor/area list: still not supplied. CR-005's upload is ready for it; every seeded value remains obviously fake.
• SMTP host/credentials for production mail: the gate ships off; the password is env-only. Nothing on this branch has sent a real email.

For the next revision

• BL-020 — the wizard→creator navigation prompts to leave (T4.3's guard doing its job on what is now a page exit); product call on suppression.
• BL-021 — project_sop_team() reads a path pushSOP never writes; the critical-reopen mail has never reached the PM/CM. One line, needs its own sink verification.
• BL-022 — F6's "roughly two screens": 2.17 vs the strict 2.0. Bless it or name the chrome to trim.
• BL-023 — the productivity factor (actual ÷ estimated); data already aggregated, placement needs Nick.
• BL-024 — 21 native dialogs on admin/users/launcher; the T7.9 kit is ready for them.
• S13 — seed_demo.py sign-in.
• Product questions raised in commit messages, awaiting answers: hold reachable from Draft/Scheduled (T7.3); CR-014 email body content (T7.6); merged-PDF export (T9.1).
• Acceptance criteria that turned out wrong, for the next plan's calibration: F6's height bar collided with D3's own chosen design (amended once, then left red rather than moved again); A2's "tab count badge" predated D3 removing tabs (the rail carried it); S1's "0 dialogs" never named the console pages that held a quarter of them.