n.siegfried
03d24138ed
T1.5 stopped editable fields looking disabled by reaching past the wizard's own token block with a fallback: background: var(--cds-field, var(--bg-card)). T3.2 deleted the local tokens, so the fallback is now dead code and the canonical token is simply consumed. The interim comment is gone; grep for INTERIM in the sheet returns nothing, and the sheet declares no field-specific colour. Measured in the browser rather than asserted - every enabled text control in the suite, side by side: sop .field input #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px sop .user-pick #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px creator .field input #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px console .toolbar input #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px launcher .proj-row #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px .user-pick was not identical before this commit, and that is the one thing here beyond the written task. The sign-off name pickers were --bg on a --border hairline - #f4f4f4 on #e0e0e0, which is precisely the grey-on-grey that F5/A3 is about. They were missed because the review counted inputs inside .field and these two sit outside it, which is why they needed their own rule in the first place. Fixing the token duplication without fixing them would have left the defect on the page while reporting it closed. Disabled fields stay distinguishable: f_items F5 reads them at #f4f4f4 on the same #8d8d8d border, so fill carries locked-vs-editable and the border does not move. BL-002 folded in, as that entry asks. All three outline:none sites in this sheet are gone: .field input/select/textarea:focus had a 3px --primary-light glow .user-pick:focus had the same glow .seq-step input.seq-label:focus had NO replacement at all #edf5ff against a #ffffff field is a 1.05:1 edge - a faint halo on the card and nothing at all on the field. Replaced with the ring console.css:69 and wp-chrome.css:206 already draw, so this is the app's existing idiom rather than a fourth one: 2px of --cds-focus, inset by -2px over the control's own edge. Verified with CDP focus emulation ON. Without it the headless page is not the focused document, :focus never matches, and every reading comes back as the unfocused style - which looks like a pass and is not one. It cost a wrong answer before I noticed, so it is worth saying. .user-pick and .seq-label also live on later wizard steps, which are display:none and cannot take focus, so the probe reveals the steps before measuring: .field input / select / textarea 2px solid #0f62fe offset -2px .user-pick 2px solid #0f62fe offset -2px .seq-label 2px solid #0f62fe offset -2px f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES. browser_check 71/71. Two findings outside this task's files, logged rather than fixed: BL-013, the creator's inputs have NO outline on focus and rely on the same 1.05:1 glow, which is BL-002's defect in the sheet next door and belongs to T7.2; and BL-014, four controls on the launcher and field view fall back to the UA default ring, which is visible but is a fourth idiom - T9.5 with C1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>