Project-SDE-WP-Suite/docs/waves/backlog.md

Backlog

Anything noticed during implementation that is real but not in the plan goes here instead of into the current PR. CLAUDE.md requires this: every change traces to an item ID, so unplanned work gets logged rather than built.

Add an entry, do not fix it inline. This file is reviewed at T9.7 and feeds the next spec revision.

Format

### BL-001 — Short title

- **Found during:** T3.2
- **Where:** path/to/file.js:120
- **What:** one or two sentences on the problem
- **Why not now:** out of scope for the current wave / needs a product decision / larger than the task
- **Suggested wave or follow-up:** wave 9 / next revision / needs Nick

Known follow-ups already identified in the spec

These are logged from the source documents, not discovered in code. They are real but deliberately deferred.

BL-000a — Validated P6 activity lookup

• From: CR-001
• What: CR-001 accepts free text for the P6 Activity ID. A validated lookup against an imported P6 activity list was identified as the eventual want.
• Why not now: the Micron schedule is actively being reworked, so importing an activity list now would import churn.
• Suggested: next revision, once the schedule stabilizes.

BL-000b — Field-level toggles in General Information

• From: CR-006
• What: CR-006 toggles whole sections. General Information may need per-field toggles, since projects differ in which identifiers they use.
• Why not now: section-level toggles cover every removal request currently on the list.
• Suggested: next revision, if a second project needs a different field set.

BL-000c — Estimated versus actual hours productivity factor

• From: CR-017
• What: Actual Hours is retained and rolls up. Comparing it against estimated hours would produce a productivity factor, which was the stated reason for wanting the field.
• Why not now: estimated hours capture is not in scope this round.
• Suggested: next revision.

BL-000d — Attachment merge versus list on export

• From: CR-008 / T9.1
• What: whether the PDF export merges attachments into one package or lists them separately.
• Why not now: product decision, raised in the T9.1 PR.
• Suggested: needs Nick.

Found during implementation

BL-001 — The creator overflows horizontally at 1440px

• Found during: T0.2
• Where: html/wp-creation-index.html / html/wp-creation-styles.css
• What: the creator lays out 1,551px of content inside a 1,440px viewport, so the page scrolls sideways at desk width. Measured by tests/baseline_shots.py, which compares documentElement.scrollWidth against clientWidth at each capture. F2 covers narrow widths; no item covers this one. The other three overflowing pages (launcher 425px, SOP wizard 429px, field view 432px, all at a 390px viewport) are F2 and are already scheduled.
• Why not now: wave 1 is scoped to F1–F5, and T7.1 dissolves this page's iframe and rebuilds its layout regardless — fixing it in wave 1 would be thrown away.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: verify it is gone at T7.1; if it survives the rebuild, it needs its own item in the next revision.
• Root cause, found at T1.4 — not fixed, T7.1 owns it. wp-creation-styles.css:815 has @media (max-width: 860px) { body { --nav-w: 56px; } }, which is correct. But wp-creation-app.js:1389 injects body{--nav-w:288px;} into a runtime <style> with no media query. Injected last, same specificity, so it wins over the media query and --nav-w stays 288px at every width. Everything keyed off it then reserves 288px of rail that is not there: .main padding-left calc(288px + 28px) (wp-creation-styles.css:109), .ctx-bar (:452), .release-banner (:488), .section-nav-bar (:596) and .sticky-save { left: var(--nav-w,288px) } (:820). At a 390px screen that forces the initial containing block to 485px. The fix is to give the injected rule the same breakpoint, or to stop injecting the value that the stylesheet already declares — one line, but it belongs with the creator rebuild rather than in a wave 1 rendering task.
• Consequence for F4: every position: fixed; right: 0 element on this page sits at the right edge of that 485px box, which is 95px off the visible 390px screen. The comments drawer is placed correctly relative to its containing block; the containing block is wrong. T1.4 reports this as an attributed note rather than a drawer defect, so nobody is sent to the wrong file.
• Update, T1.2: the 1440px half of this is resolved as a side effect, not by intent. The unbreakable #wp-usermenu run that T1.2 fixed was the cause of four of the five overflows recorded in wave 0 — launcher, SOP wizard and field view at 390px, and the creator at 1440px. Capture now reports overflow on 1 of 14 shots instead of 5. What remains is the creator at 390px (485px of content), which is its own layout rather than the shared chrome. Left open so T7.1 still checks it.

BL-002 — outline: none appears three times in the wizard sheet, not once

• Found during: T0.1
• Where: html/work-package-suite-styles.css:325, :347, :501
• What: A3/F5 cite the focus-ring removal at 322-328 only. The same outline:none + pale 3px glow is repeated at :347 (.user-pick:focus), and :501 (.seq-step input.seq-label:focus) removes the outline with no replacement at all, which is a straight CLAUDE.md violation.
• Why not now: it is in scope for T3.4, not a separate item — recorded so the task fixes all three rather than the one the review cited.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: fold into T3.4.

BL-003 — User-menu links are 16px tap targets

• Found during: T1.2
• Where: html/auth-guard.js:186-191 (buildUserMenu's link())
• What: every link in the app bar's user menu — including Sign out — renders 16px tall, from font:400 13px/1.2. T1.2 made them all reachable at 390px, but reachable is not the same as comfortably tappable on the gloved-hands surface. Well under the usual 24–44px guidance.
• Why not now: T1.2 is explicitly triage and T2.2 replaces this markup with the drawer, which has its own tap targets. Enlarging them here would change the 1440px layout the task must leave byte-identical, and would be thrown away in wave 2.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: T2.2 should ship the drawer with adequate targets; C1's audit at T9.5 confirms it app-wide.

BL-004 — help.js ships a 52-colour palette in a different design language

• Found during: T3.1
• Where: html/help.js:79 (the injected <style>)
• What: the help centre injects its own stylesheet with 52 colour literals and zero var(). It is not a fourth copy of the suite palette — it is a different one: slate (#27313f, #334155, #e2e8f0), violet (#7c3aed, #f3e8ff), its own blue (rgba(37,99,214,.15), see BL-008) and its own greys (#fafbfc, #eef1f6, #f4f6f9, #f7f8fa). It loads on the launcher, SOP wizard, creator and field view.
• Why not now: T3.2's contract is "no rendered change", and converting this palette is a restyle, not a consolidation — it would change the help centre on four pages and break the empty-screenshot-diff done-when. The token rule in CLAUDE.md does reach it, so it is real work, not a non-issue.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: wave 9, alongside C4. Documented in docs/reference/tokens.md §1.

BL-005 — Two modals are styled entirely by inline style= attributes

• Found during: T3.1
• Where: html/auth-guard.js:67-92 (change-password) and html/wp-format.js:120-150 (preferences)
• What: 35 raw colour literals between them — #0f62fe, #8d8d8d, #e0e0e0, #defbe6, #fff1f1, #0e6027, rgba(20,30,50,.5) and so on — written into style= strings, so no stylesheet can reach them and no token can either.
• Why not now: they are markup built by JS, not a stylesheet, so they are outside T3.2's four-sheet surface. Both dialogs are rebuilt as accessible components under C1.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: T9.5, with the C1 audit.

BL-006 — Seventeen half-pixel font sizes

• Found during: T3.1
• Where: html/wp-creation-styles.css (14) and html/wp-chrome.css (3)
• What: 9.5px, 10.5px, 11.5px, 12.5px, 13.5px sit inside an otherwise integer type scale of 27 distinct sizes. They round inconsistently between engines and there is no reason for any of them.
• Why not now: retiring them moves text on every creator screen; T3.2 forbids rendered change and T7.1 re-lays-out this page anyway.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: T7.1. See docs/reference/tokens.md §6a.

BL-007 — --radius: 0 is contradicted 45 times in the sheet that declares it

• Found during: T3.1
• Where: html/wp-creation-styles.css:26 and 45 raw border-radius values in the same file
• What: the creator declares --radius: 0 and honours it 23 times, then writes 2px 3px 4px 5px 6px 8px 9px 10px 12px 14px 20px 50% directly in 45 other places, plus two asymmetric CTA radii at :707 and :716. Square corners are the Carbon idiom and the intent everywhere else in the suite; this one sheet drifted.
• Why not now: changing 45 radii is the most visible diff available, and T3.2 must produce none.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: T7.1. See docs/reference/tokens.md §6c.

BL-008 — There is a second brand blue: #2563d6

• Found during: T3.1
• Where: html/wp-creation-styles.css:565, html/help.js, html/wp-creation-app.js:1257
• What: .sop-inherited — the highlight on every field a work package inherited from its SOP — fills with rgba(37,99,214,0.07), which is #2563d6, not the suite's #0f62fe. help.js carries the same blue at .15 alpha and the print window uses it solid for headings. At 7% nobody has noticed, but "one accent colour" is not currently true even after the four token systems collapse to one.
• Why not now: swapping it changes a rendered fill, which T3.2 forbids. It is the same conversation as the green action buttons.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: T3.5, with A5. See docs/reference/tokens.md §8-E.

BL-009 — A ninth amber, four points from the eighth

• Found during: T3.2
• Where: html/field.html:35 (.pill.warn)
• What: the field view's warn pill uses #8a6d00; every other warning text in the app is #8e6a00. Four points apart, doing the same job, on the surface that is read through a face shield. Almost certainly a typo rather than a decision — field.html's inline <style> was missed by the T3.1 inventory, which is why it survived this long.
• Why not now: merging it moves a rendered colour, which T3.2 forbids. T3.2 named it --wp-status-warning-text-alt so it is visible rather than hidden in a hex.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: T3.5. See docs/reference/tokens.md §8-K.

BL-010 — 829 raw spacing, type and radius values remain inside rules

• Found during: T3.2
• Where: all five page stylesheets; 492 of them in html/wp-creation-styles.css
• What: T3.2 removed every raw colour from the page sheets, but 483 spacing values, 281 font-sizes and 65 radii are still written literally in rules. The token declarations are aliased — --s1…--s6, --ctl, --radius, --mono, --sans all resolve from theme-light.css — but the rules that should consume them do not.
• Why not now: not effort — arithmetic. The creator's spacing is every integer from 1px to 14px, which is a histogram rather than a scale, so there is no token padding: 9px 11px maps to without changing one of the two numbers. T3.2 forbids changing a rendered value, so tokenising these and honouring that constraint are mutually exclusive. This is the one T3.2 done-when not met, and it is recorded as not met rather than quietly skipped.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: T5.x and T7.1, where these pages are re-laid-out and the values are being chosen again anyway. See docs/reference/tokens.md §6b and §11.

BL-011 — Three JS-injected overlays race to append on the SOP page

• Found during: T3.2
• Where: html/work-package-suite.html — #wp-sync-badge, .wp-navscrim, #wp-sidenav
• What: the sync badge, the drawer scrim and the drawer are appended to <body> by three different scripts after async work, so their DOM order varies run to run. Nothing is painted differently — all three are position: fixed with their own z-index — but any test that keys elements by sibling index sees dozens of phantom differences on this page. It cost real time in T3.2 before the cause was found, and tests/token_check.py now keys by identity to avoid it.
• Why not now: invisible to users, and the fix is ordering in three separate scripts, which is a change with no observable benefit while T7.1 is still going to move this code.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: wave 9, if it is still true after T7.1.

BL-012 — admin.html and the creator at 1440px are not stable enough to screenshot-diff

• Found during: T3.2
• Where: tests/baseline_shots.py output for admin-390, admin-1440, creator-1440
• What: the task brief's trap 2 says admin.html and users.html are not byte-stable. Measured by capturing wave 2 against itself: users is stable at both widths, and the unstable third is the creator at 1440px (344,272 px differ, bbox 288,14→1439,4924). admin is worse than "live timestamps" suggests — its captured page height varies by about 600px between runs, so the two images cannot even be compared pixel-for-pixel.
• Why not now: the screenshots are a review aid, not a gate; tests/token_check.py now covers what the diff was being asked to prove, and covers it better.
• Suggested wave or follow-up: wave 9, alongside C2. Either freeze the clock in the fixture or exclude the live regions from capture — otherwise every later wave re-learns this.