Files
Project-SDE-WP-Suite/docs/waves/wave-6.md
n.siegfried 3d99d4b9d0 Import the R2 implementation spec into the repo
The plan was delivered as wp-suite-implementation-spec.zip and lived only in
Downloads, so every "read CLAUDE.md first" instruction in it pointed at a file
the repo did not have. Bring it in unchanged: CLAUDE.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, and
docs/waves/wave-0 through wave-9 plus backlog.md.

UX-REVIEW-2026-08-14.md is committed alongside it. It is the review that
produced F1-F6, S1-S13 and the A/B/C assessments, and item IDs throughout the
wave files cite it, so it belongs under version control rather than sitting
untracked in the working tree.

No application code changes here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 17:42:56 -05:00

154 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown

# Wave 6 — Work package general information
**Items:** `CR-001`, `CR-003`, `CR-004`, `CR-018`, `A7`
**Depends on:** wave 5 merged
**Why here:** these are the field's most-requested changes and they need the location lists
(`T5.4`), the server aggregates (`T4.1`) and the token system (`T3.2`) to already exist.
---
### T6.1 — CR-001: P6 Activity ID and Description
- **Items:** `CR-001`
- **Depends on:** T5.5
- **Blocks:** nothing
- **Surface:** `server/` + `html/`
- **Files:** work package model, General Information section, list/dashboard, PDF export
**Intent:** Every work package traces back to the P6 schedule activity that drives it, so a
date on the work package is anchored to a schedule activity rather than floating on its own.
The meeting placed this at the top of the work package, next to the due date.
**Do:** Add `P6 Activity ID` and `P6 Activity Description` to General Information. Free text
is acceptable — a validated lookup against an imported activity list is explicitly deferred,
partly because the Micron schedule is actively being reworked.
Display the Activity ID next to the Due Date so the schedule driver is visible without
scrolling. Add it to the list/dashboard as a sortable column and to the PDF export.
**Done when:**
- [ ] both fields exist, persist, and survive a reload
- [ ] Activity ID renders next to Due Date on the detail view
- [ ] the list/dashboard column sorts correctly, including with empty values
- [ ] both fields appear on the PDF export
- [ ] the fields respect the `CR-006` section toggles
---
### T6.2 — CR-003: Priority
- **Items:** `CR-003`
- **Depends on:** T3.5
- **Blocks:** nothing
- **Surface:** `server/` + `html/`
- **Files:** work package model, General Information, list/dashboard, PDF export
**Intent:** Due date alone does not convey urgency. Exactly three levels, agreed live in the
meeting: Normal, High, Urgent. Normal is the baseline default.
**Do:** A required dropdown with those three values, defaulting to Normal. Filterable and
sortable on the dashboard. Color-coded using canonical tokens only (`X7`). Printed on the
PDF export.
Priority is independent of status: it can change after issue without a status change.
**Do not:** add a fourth level. Do not introduce a new color outside the token system.
**Done when:**
- [ ] exactly three values exist; Normal is the default on a new work package
- [ ] the dashboard filters and sorts by priority
- [ ] priority colors come from canonical tokens; no raw hex added
- [ ] color is not the only signal — the label is always present
- [ ] priority prints on the PDF export
- [ ] changing priority does not alter status
---
### T6.3 — CR-004: Building / Floor / Sector dropdowns
- **Items:** `CR-004`
- **Depends on:** T5.4, T4.1
- **Blocks:** T6.4, T8.4
- **Surface:** `server/` + `html/`
- **Files:** Location section, work package model, dashboard filters
**Intent:** Users pick location from a controlled list rather than typing it. Floors within
B100 behave like separate buildings and are the unit of both execution and cost tracking.
**Do:** Three dependent dropdowns in the Location section, sourced from the project
configuration built in `T5.4`. Selecting a Building filters Floors; selecting a Floor filters
Sectors. Store codes, not display strings. Add dashboard filters for all three.
**Do not:** free-text these fields, and do not read the option lists from `localStorage`
(`X5`).
**Done when:**
- [ ] all three render as dropdowns populated from project configuration
- [ ] dependent filtering works, and clearing a parent clears its children
- [ ] values persist as codes; confirm by inspecting stored data
- [ ] the dashboard filters by each of the three
- [ ] a work package referencing a deactivated value still renders correctly
- [ ] all option data comes from the server
---
### T6.4 — CR-018: Rollup by floor and area
- **Items:** `CR-018`
- **Depends on:** T6.3, T4.1
- **Blocks:** nothing
- **Surface:** `server/` + `html/`
- **Files:** aggregate endpoints, dashboard
**Intent:** This is why the Acumatica cost code was removed rather than relabeled. The
tracking dimension the team wants is floor and area, not an accounting code. For Phase 2 the
intent is to stop treating B100 as one building and monitor by floor, since each floor
carries its own instrumentation and material load.
**Do:** Extend the `T4.1` aggregates to group and total by Building, Floor and Sector. Surface
grouped totals on the dashboard. Where hours are captured (Closeout `Actual Hours`, retained
per `CR-017`), roll them up along the same dimensions.
**Done when:**
- [ ] the dashboard groups and totals by Building, Floor and Sector
- [ ] totals reconcile against an unfiltered count; verify with a known data set
- [ ] Actual Hours rolls up along the same dimensions
- [ ] grouping is computed server-side
- [ ] work packages with no location assigned appear in an explicit "unassigned" group rather than vanishing
---
### T6.5 — A7: Card status lines, footer clarity, language and time
- **Items:** `A7`
- **Depends on:** T3.5
- **Blocks:** nothing
- **Surface:** `html/`
- **Files:** card components, footer, `admin.js:484-517`
**Do:** Clarify status lines on cards and tidy the footer as proposed.
**Do not:** remove localization. `admin.js:484-517` handles language and time and it is a
shipped feature. The review specifically endorsed keeping it. If the proposal reads as
removing it, that reading is wrong.
**Done when:**
- [ ] card status lines read clearly and use the canonical status colors
- [ ] the footer is unambiguous about what it is showing
- [ ] localization still functions; verify by switching language and time format
- [ ] `admin.js:484-517` behavior is unchanged
---
## Wave 6 exit criteria
- [ ] P6 activity, priority and structured location all persist and export
- [ ] the dashboard filters by priority and by all three location levels
- [ ] rollups are server-computed and reconcile
- [ ] localization intact