12d19446d51351d4e6737ea121212036bb13c15d
13 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12d19446d5 |
T7.1 - B7: dissolve the creator iframe, and D1 give it back its sample data
There is no iframe in html/ any more. The creator is a top-level document with
the same app bar and the same tab strip as the SOP wizard; the two tabs that
used to swap a frame are links between them.
DEVIATION, stated rather than smuggled. The wave file says "remove the iframe
boundary so the creator renders in the parent document". It renders as its own
document instead. Every done-when is met - no iframe, no cross-frame messaging,
F4 resolved structurally, CR-006 toggles with no special-casing, back and
forward intact with T4.2's URL state - but the route is the other one, and the
reason is in creator-frame.md's own numbers:
merge into parent make it a page
selector collisions to resolve 21 0
script global collisions 9 0
cross-frame call sites to remove 28 28
probe entry points needing rework ~29 2
The 21 and the 9 were never the cost of dissolving the boundary. They are the
cost of MERGING TWO DOCUMENTS, which is a different change the boundary was
hiding. And 29 probe call sites address wp-creation-index.html directly, so a
route that keeps that address keeps all of them. creator-frame.md section 5
records this in full.
What went, and what replaced it:
#wp-frame, applyEmbedLayout, sizeWPFrame, viewportMinusChrome, chromeHeight,
renderWPTab, the resize handler, the ResizeObserver, --wp-chrome-h,
.content-area.embed-full, body.embed-full -> the window sizes the page
?embedded=1, body.embedded, .embed-hide, .embed-first -> nothing. An old
link carrying the param is ignored rather than half-obeyed.
openWpById / showDashboard / showForm / dashApplyFlag / applySopSections
called across the frame -> the URL. ?project= ?view= ?wp= ?flag= were
already read at the creator's own boot (T4.2), which is exactly why those four
could be DELETED rather than migrated. X4 is closed: the surviving path is the
one T5.5 built and proved.
inIframe in auth-guard.js, wp-chrome.js, wp-sidenav.js, help.js and _isTop in
project-data.js -> gone. help.js now reads the explicit WP_HELP_NO_FAB flag
both tool pages set, instead of inferring intent from where it is rendered.
.main-nav / .nav-tab in work-package-suite-styles.css -> wp-chrome.css,
because a tab row only one of two documents can style is the shape that put
the tabs in the parent and the toolbar in the child to begin with.
The three questions creator-frame.md section 4 said no count could answer:
1. The creator gets the app bar. It was the only page loading neither
wp-chrome file. Its header is now the .header-left / .header-right pair the
wizard uses, so the switcher lands in the same place on both.
2. Two sequence components, scoped not merged - confirmed Aug 18 that the
sequence is authored in the SOP and adjustable per package. BL-015 stays.
3. body.embedded is gone. The header it hid is replaced by the app bar; the
sample controls are visible in a new package toolbar (D1); the analytics
button is visible there until T7.10 moves it. The Dashboard BUTTON in that
row became a TAB, which is the one place B7's "fold the toolbar into the
tab row" actually happened.
Old addresses still resolve. ?tab=wp, ?view=dashboard and ?wp=<id> are in
bookmarks, in wp-sidenav's link map, and they are the shape CR-011 and CR-014
were specified against (X1). The wizard forwards them with replace(), so Back
does not bounce. Breaking these silently was the one regression this task could
have shipped that nobody would notice for weeks. frame_check.py section 4 pins
all three.
BEHAVIOUR CHANGE, deliberate. The live cross-frame hand-off showed the creator a
section toggle that had NOT been saved: flip it, look, reload, and the section
came back. What the creator shows now is the SOP that is stored. sections_check
5b pins both halves - an unsaved toggle does not travel, a saved one does.
BEHAVIOUR CHANGE, not deliberate, logged as BL-020. A tab switch is a page exit
now, so leaving the wizard with unsaved SOP edits fires T4.3's unsaved-work
guard. Nothing is lost - the guard writes the draft first and T4.3 recovers it -
but it is friction that did not exist, and suppressing a deliberate guard is a
product decision with its own downside. Logged, not quietly handled here.
tests/frame_check.py, 39 checks, new. Two of them exist because of failures
during this task rather than in it:
- "both documents parse and boot". A const shadowing a function parameter is a
SyntaxError, and work-package-suite-app.js did not parse at all for one run.
Four checks in url_state_check went red and not one said "the script did not
load". Asserting a page's own entry points exist costs nothing.
- "focus emulation is on, so a focus reading means something". An earlier draft
called page.call instead of page.ws.call inside a try/except and measured
nothing, reporting no focus ring anywhere - which looks exactly like a
finding. Trap 5 in reverse, for the second time in this project.
The four backlog entries logged against this file, re-measured rather than
assumed:
BL-001 still reproduces (485px in a 390px viewport) but its RECORDED CAUSE IS
WRONG. --nav-w now computes to 56px, so the injected-style explanation
is spent. The overflow is the creator's data tables - #asset-body's
lays out at 520px with no scroll container. frame_check reports the
offending boxes by selector and skips position:fixed subtrees, because
the comments drawer parked off-screen at right:844 made the first
measurement blame the drawer. Pinned, not fixed: T7.2 lays out the form.
BL-013 CLOSED. It was fixed by S12 in WAVE 4 - wp-creation-styles.css:209
carries the comment naming this entry - and nobody updated it. It was
quoted as a live CLAUDE.md violation while planning wave 7 and had not
been true for four waves. a11y_check walks 120 focusable elements on
the creator and every one rings at >= 3:1.
BL-006 15 by the probe's measure, unchanged; different denominator, stated.
BL-007 68 raw radii by the probe's measure. Nothing has reduced it in four
waves; it is measured every run now instead of once.
BL-018 cost a FOURTH probe. frame_check imports set_sop from sections_check
rather than writing a fifth copy of the workaround. T9.9 owns it.
Probes re-pointed, with reasons in the files: sections_check 5b (drove the live
hand-off), pipeline_check check 2 (read through contentDocument), f_items F4
(drove standalone and embedded; there is one mode now), validation_check
(lost "the wrong tab", gained the SOP gate).
Verified: frame_check 39/39, sections_check 95/95, pipeline_check 44/44,
url_state_check 23/23, validation_check 83/83, a11y_check 22/22,
autosave_check 34/34, aggregates_check 16/16, stepper_check 71/71,
browser_check 71/71, launcher_check 58/58, generalinfo_check 49/49,
rollup_check 63/63, cards_check 44/44, locations_check 58/58.
f_items: F1-F5 fixed, F6 reproduces (T7.2).
Metrics: iframes 1 -> 0, colour literals in rules outside theme-light.css 0,
dialogs 64, <div onclick> 2, .help-tip 18.
Items: B7 D1
Task: T7.1
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| c453e50412 |
T5.6 - CR-002: Acumatica cost code and task, hidden by toggle
The team concluded these two are noise on a field work package: cost codes are
effectively constant on a job and the Acumatica task mapping is a PM concern.
The cost visibility they actually want is by building and floor, which is CR-004
and CR-018.
Hidden, not removed. CLAUDE.md: "Removed fields are hidden, not deleted (CR-002,
CR-016). Retain the data and the model." So this is a second, narrower toggle
list beside T5.5's sections - two fields inside General Information rather than
two more sections, because a section is a block of the document and these are
two rows in one.
no migration the values live in the work package's JSON data blob,
which nothing here writes to. The probe greps every
migration for a drop_column touching either.
no model change server/models.py is untouched by this task
no code change to the toggles are SOP data. Another project turns them
re-enable back on from step 12 and both fields return, values
included
A field is on only if its own toggle is on AND the section holding it is. Asked
as one question (WPSections.fieldOn) so no caller has to remember to ask both -
a field showing inside a hidden section is not a state worth reasoning about,
and the probe checks that case explicitly.
html/wp-sections.js FIELDS, fieldOn, normalizeFields
html/work-package-suite-app.js field rows nested under their section
html/work-package-suite-styles.css .field-toggle
html/wp-creation-index.html ids on the two .field wrappers
html/wp-creation-app.js WP_FIELD_NODES; both document rows conditional
tests/sections_check.py +22 checks (53 -> 75)
Done when
[x] neither field appears in the form, detail view or PDF export when off
[x] existing records still hold their values - a package EDITED while both are
off comes back through collectPackage() with both intact
[x] the fields can be re-enabled for another SOP without a code change
[x] no schema migration drops data - checked against every migration in the
tree, not just the ones this wave added
The whole .field wrapper is hidden, not the input: a bare label over nothing is
worse than either state.
Raised, not fixed
BL-019 A cost code that has left COST_CODES is silently blanked on edit.
wp_cost is a <select>, and setting .value to something with no matching
<option> does nothing at all - so opening such a package clears the
field and the next save writes the blank back. The same bug was fixed
once already for gov_wosize (work-package-suite-app.js:490-495) by
adding the stored value as an option; cost code never got it.
Found the honest way: a probe here used an invented cost code to prove
hiding a field does not delete its value, and the value came back
empty. That looked exactly like the toggle eating data. It was not, and
the probe now uses a real code and says why in a comment - a probe that
fails for a reason other than the one it names is worse than no probe.
Verified one at a time
sections_check 75/75 (53 + 22 for CR-002)
browser_check 71/71
stepper_check 70/70
a11y 22/22
url_state 23/23
autosave 34/34
locations_check 58/58
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: BL-000b asks whether General Information
wants per-field toggles generally. This is not that - it is the two fields
CR-002 names, and the list is deliberately closed. If a third field wants one,
that is the general question and it needs the product answer BL-000b is holding.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 6088ef17e8 |
T5.3 - B4 surface: a pipeline strip, four server counts, four shareable links
Four cells on the launcher - Work packages, Release ready, On hold, Overdue -
every number from /api/wps/metrics, which T4.1 built. There is deliberately no
cache fallback anywhere in renderPipeline(): a remembered number sitting beside
three live ones is the failure B4 exists to remove, wearing a different hat.
The cells are the four the endpoint already computes and the dashboard already
filters on, so they map 1:1 onto its flags rather than inventing a fifth slice
nothing downstream understands. wp-creation-app.js now names them (DASH_FLAGS)
for the same reason: a cell linking to a filter the board does not recognise is
a dead link that still looks live.
"Links to a filtered view via a shareable URL" needed the filter to BE URL state,
which it was not - the dashboard kept its flag in a variable. So:
- dashToggleFlag pushes ?flag=<f>, and clears it on the way out of the board
- the creator applies ?flag= before its first render, not after (applying it
after paints the whole board and throws it away)
- Back and Forward move through filters like any other state
- work-package-suite-app.js forwards the flag ACROSS the iframe boundary, since
the creator's src carries only the project. B7/T7.1 dissolves that frame and
this hand-off goes with it; it is commented as such.
Zero is a real answer for one slice of a project that has work in it. Four zeros
on a project with none is not a reading, it is a strip that looks broken - that
case gets a sentence and a way into the creator instead. A failed request gets an
explicit error naming the failure, and no cells at all.
html/index.html the strip, its states, PIPE_CELLS
html/wp-creation-app.js flag as URL state; DASH_FLAGS; dashApplyFlag
html/work-package-suite-app.js forward the flag into the frame; clear on exit
tests/pipeline_check.py new - 43 checks
Done when
[x] every number comes from a server endpoint - proved by poisoning localStorage
with 99 fake packages and demanding the strip still read the server's 4
[x] each cell links to a filtered view via a shareable URL - and the probe
FOLLOWS the link and reads the filter inside the frame rather than trusting
that a correct-looking URL was built
[x] a project with zero work packages renders a sensible empty state
[x] the strip announces updates via aria-live (polite - a count is not an
interruption) and reports aria-busy while it is counting
What the probe caught
The link landed on "Complete the SOP Configuration first". Not the strip's
fault: browser_check.py's fixture stores a bare {governance: …} blob as the SOP
data, where production stores {sop, state}. restoreSavedSOP() needs `state` and
bails without it, so sopComplete stays false and the WP tab shows its gate.
pipeline_check seeds the production shape. The underlying wart is real and is
logged rather than fixed - see BL-018.
Verified one at a time
pipeline_check 43/43 new
launcher_check 58/58
stepper_check 70/70
url_state 23/23 the dashboard's new flag state did not disturb it
aggregates 16/16
browser_check 71/71
a11y 22/22
autosave 34/34
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
No colour literal added: still 0 across all page sheets and inline blocks. The
four cells are told apart by a label, a sentence and an accent - three channels,
so colour is not carrying it alone (C1).
Raised, not fixed
BL-018 The WP tab's gate is the last localStorage-derived status in the app.
T4.1 moved the launcher's card to the server; the wizard page still
decides gate-or-creator from wp_suite_sop_complete plus a state blob.
pullProject refreshes both on load so a connected user is fine, but the
two answers come from different places and the fallback is silent.
Includes a second, sharper edge: project-data.js:210 writes that flag
for ANY row returned, including one with no `state` to restore - so the
flag is written and never read consistently. T7.1 owns it.
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: the strip counts Overdue against `data.due`,
which is free text today. CR-004/CR-018 restructure location but not dates. If
"overdue" is going to drive anything beyond a launcher tile, that field needs a
type.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 77c043c3db |
T5.2 - B3: a first-run empty state, then the picker card comes out
B3's warning is about ORDER, and it is the whole item: the proposal removes the
project-picker card, and the first-run empty state was built inside it. Remove
the card first and every brand-new account lands on a page whose only
instruction is to choose from a list with nothing in it.
So the empty state was built first, as its own thing rather than a branch inside
a control that is going away, and only then did the card go.
The launcher now shows exactly one of three states:
no projects at all what a project is for, the create form already open (it
is the only thing to do on this page, so hiding it behind
a button is one click of ceremony in front of the only
way forward), and the sample offered underneath it
none chosen point at the app bar's switcher, which is on every page,
plus New project
one active the tool cards, as before
Switching moved to the app bar's switcher entirely. Its popover footer used to
read "All projects / new project" and link to index.html - half of that promise
moved into the popover itself and the other half needs a form, so the link now
says New project and carries #new-project, which the launcher opens on.
The create form was rebuilt, so per C1 it ships accessible: a real <form> with
requestSubmit, every input labelled, and its validation inline at the field with
aria-describedby and role="alert" - the same shape T5.8 gives the wizard. That
retires the "Project name is required." alert (index.html 6 -> 5).
html/index.html three states, rebuilt create form, picker card removed
html/wp-chrome.js popover footer link (one line - it named the card)
tests/launcher_check.py new - 58 checks, two seeded databases
tests/f_items.py F1 rewritten to drive the controls that replaced the select
Done when
[x] a brand-new account with zero projects sees a clear path to create one
[x] the sample project remains discoverable from the empty state
[x] the picker card is removed only after the empty state ships
[x] switching projects still works from the header for users who have projects
Two things the probes caught that I would have shipped
F1 went INCONCLUSIVE, not FAIL. Its probe drove `document.querySelector
('select')` on the launcher - the picker card's dropdown. It refused to guess
rather than reporting a silent pass, which is the behaviour f_items was
written for. Rewritten to drive both replacements, because they fail
differently: the switcher RELOADS with ?project=<id>, so its two labels cannot
drift apart whatever subscribes to what; creating a project changes the active
project IN PAGE, and that is the interaction F1's mechanism actually applies
to. It is now the only in-page change on the launcher, so it is the arm that
matters. Both pass - the bar subscribes through ProjectData.onActiveChange.
launcher_check reported "no focus ring" on the rebuilt form's inputs. That was
trap 5 in reverse: without CDP focus emulation the headless document is not
the focused one, :focus-visible never matches, and every control reports NO
ring - a false red where a11y_check would get a false green. With emulation on
they draw 2px --cds-focus from T4.7's app-wide floor.
Verified one at a time
launcher_check 58/58 new (38 empty-account + 20 populated)
stepper_check 70/70
browser_check 71/71
aggregates 16/16
a11y 22/22 launcher 29 focusable elements, all >= 3:1
url_state 23/23
autosave 34/34
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
No colour literal added: 0 across all five page sheets and all seven inline
<style> blocks.
Raised, not fixed
BL-014 updated rather than left stale: two of its four sites (.proj-row select,
.link-like) went with the picker card, and the third (.proj-form-grid input)
was measured rather than assumed - it draws T4.7's ring, which post-dates that
entry. What survives is field.html's .fld-search, which T9.5 should measure the
same way instead of inheriting the wording.
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: with the picker gone, an account whose only
project is archived sees the choose-a-project prompt plus the archived note, and
the switcher lists nothing. That is honest but bleak. Whether an archived project
should stay switchable read-only is a product call, not an implementation one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 5e1f6e75ba |
T5.1 - A4/S9: a vertical stepper, ten real buttons, states in words
The step rail was ten div elements carrying onclick inside a horizontal
scroller. Not in the tab order, not operable by keyboard, and silent about
progress - the only thing on the page that said where you were was a "1 / 10"
pill in the app bar, detached from the control it described.
The rail is now a vertical column beside the form: ten <button> elements in an
<ol> inside a named <nav>, with arrow keys, Home and End on top of the Enter and
Space a button gives for free. All ten stay in the tab order; a roving tabindex
would have satisfied "arrow keys" by breaking "tab", which the done-when asks
for both of.
Four states, each carrying a word and a marker shape as well as a colour (C1):
Complete (green disc, tick), Current step (blue disc, aria-current="step"),
Locked (dashed outline) and a plain default. Locked steps keep aria-disabled
rather than disabled, so a keyboard user can reach one and be told what is in
the way instead of finding a control that has vanished from the tab order.
Reachability is the guard's own rule, deliberately not a stricter one: you may
leave the step you are on once its required fields are filled. The tempting rule
- lock everything after the first unmet gate anywhere - is not what
validateStep() enforces, and a padlock the Next button walks straight past is
the drift this change exists to remove. validateStep() and the rail now read one
STEP_GATES table, so they cannot disagree; T5.8 widens that table rather than
editing four functions.
Clicking a step you cannot reach announces why through a role="alert" region and
puts the cursor in the field that is missing. Saying "no" and leaving you where
you were, with no idea which of five inputs was empty, is what the dialog did.
Below 900px the rail collapses to a disclosure naming the step you are on -
ten vertical rows above the fields is most of a 390px screen before you reach an
input. 44px tap targets, since Field View is the gloved-hands surface.
Also: going backwards is no longer gated. previousStep() never validated, so a
rail that did would have trapped you on an incomplete step.
html/work-package-suite.html rail markup, counter removed
html/work-package-suite-styles.css #tool-sop grid, .step-rail*, 899px collapse
html/work-package-suite-app.js STEP_GATES, renderStepRail, keyboard, watcher
tests/stepper_check.py new - 70 checks
Done when
[x] all 10 steps are <button> elements
[x] keyboard: tab, arrow keys, Home/End, Enter and Space
[x] aria-current on the current step, exactly one
[x] complete / current / unavailable told apart without colour
[x] the "1 / 10" counter is gone - no .step-counter, no N/10 in the app bar
[x] app-wide <div onclick> 12 -> 2, down exactly 10
Verified one at a time
stepper_check 70/70 new
browser_check 71/71
url_state 23/23
a11y 22/22 sop now rings 37 focusable elements, all >= 3:1
autosave 34/34
aggregates 16/16
f_items F1-F5 FIXED, F6 REPRODUCES (T7.2)
baseline_shots 14 shots; only the sop pair changed. The beforeunload log on
sop@1440 and creator@1440 is present at HEAD too - captured
both sides to check rather than assume.
No colour literal was added: all five page sheets and all seven inline <style>
blocks still hold zero. New spacing consumes --wp-s*; three raw font sizes were
added and three removed, so BL-010 is unchanged in kind.
Raised, not fixed
BL-016 Back to a URL with no `step` leaves the wizard where it was. T4.2's
popstate handler parses NaN and ignores it; its own probe never took
that branch. stepper_check pins the current behaviour by name so the
fix has a test waiting.
BL-017 The native-dialog baseline counts the word `alert(` in comments. Four
comments written here - all of them about removing a dialog - moved
the number from 80 to 82 while two real calls were being deleted. They
were reworded; the metric still needs a comment-stripped variant, which
T5.8 owns.
Question for the PR, per CLAUDE.md: BL-015 leaves the creator's .step-tab
uppercase as the last forced-uppercase interactive text in the suite, on the
grounds that A5 scopes sentence case to buttons and field labels. The wizard's
rail is now buttons, so its labels are sentence case ("Sign-offs", "WP types").
The two are consistent by rule and inconsistent on screen until T7.x.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| ce6fb840f0 |
T3.5 - A5: one button system, and green goes back to being a status
251 buttons across the 7 pages, counted in the browser with every wizard step,
creator section and tool panel forced visible. Two thirds of them are
display:none at load, so a static grep sees about eighty and misses the rest.
FOUR ROLES, defined once in theme-light.css as --wp-btn-*, and no fifth:
primary the one action the screen exists for. Filled accent.
secondary every other real action. White, --border-strong, accent on hover.
tertiary navigating or undoing. No fill, no border, accent text.
danger destructive. Outlined red; filled red only where the control is too
small for an outline to read - the 28px x on a sequence row.
Every button class is mapped to a role in docs/reference/tokens.md section 12.
No value is new: these are the fills the sheets already rendered, given one
definition so that "primary" means one thing.
GREEN IS A STATUS COLOUR AND NO LONGER FILLS A BUTTON. A5 names two green action
buttons; there are four. .use-btn and the launcher's completed-SOP card button
never render green in the default fixture, so the review could not have seen
them - the SOP has to be finished and a suggested value has to be offered first.
.nav-btn.primary "SOP complete" wizard
.btn.btn-generate "Save & view" creator
.use-btn creator
.card.complete .card-button launcher
The green did not go anywhere. .cstatus button.on-cleared, .toggle-btn.enabled,
.wp-nav-dot.ok, .rb-ready, .badge-R and the launcher card's own left border and
status line all still carry it, and every one of those is a state rather than an
action. The launcher card in particular still says "complete" twice after this
change; it just no longer says it on the button.
SENTENCE CASE, applied to buttons and field labels only, which is the scope A5
sets. First word capitalised, the rest lowercased, acronyms and external proper
nouns left alone (SOP, QC, WP, UPN, PM/APM/CM/QM, PDF, JSON, CSV, BIM, MIMO,
Excel, Acumatica).
~30 button labels across launcher, wizard, creator, admin and two scripts
46 field labels
text-transform:uppercase removed from 4 rules - .btn and .add-btn (creator
buttons), label and .cmt-namebar label (creator field labels)
Labels carrying markup - a .req asterisk, a .help-tip chip - had only their text
nodes transformed, so the markup survives and "first word" means the first word
of the label rather than of each fragment. The creator's mono face, 10px size and
tracking are its idiom and are untouched; only the forced uppercase goes.
help.js was updated too. It names "Load Sample" and "SOP Complete" in prose, so
renaming the buttons without it would have left the help centre describing
controls that no longer exist. That coupling is the only place in the app where
button text is referenced by name.
Verified by re-running the inventory: 0 green action buttons, 0 uppercase button
labels, 251 buttons still present - nothing was lost in the rename.
console.css card headers are unchanged, confirmed by diff: the only six lines
this task touches in that file are token substitutions on button/button.primary/
button.danger, none of them within twenty lines of .card h2.
f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES. browser_check 71/71.
Left alone and logged: .step-tab is still uppercase (BL-015) - it is a stepper
tab, neither a button nor a field label, and A4/S9 rebuild the stepper. Table
headers, section eyebrows and headings keep their case throughout. BL-008 and
BL-009 were re-targeted from T3.5 to wave 9: both are colour merges on a field
fill and a status pill, and this task is scoped to buttons.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 03d24138ed |
T3.4 - A3/F5 full, BL-002: the wizard's fields look editable and focus is visible
T1.5 stopped editable fields looking disabled by reaching past the wizard's own token block with a fallback: background: var(--cds-field, var(--bg-card)). T3.2 deleted the local tokens, so the fallback is now dead code and the canonical token is simply consumed. The interim comment is gone; grep for INTERIM in the sheet returns nothing, and the sheet declares no field-specific colour. Measured in the browser rather than asserted - every enabled text control in the suite, side by side: sop .field input #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px sop .user-pick #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px creator .field input #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px console .toolbar input #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px launcher .proj-row #ffffff on #8d8d8d 1px .user-pick was not identical before this commit, and that is the one thing here beyond the written task. The sign-off name pickers were --bg on a --border hairline - #f4f4f4 on #e0e0e0, which is precisely the grey-on-grey that F5/A3 is about. They were missed because the review counted inputs inside .field and these two sit outside it, which is why they needed their own rule in the first place. Fixing the token duplication without fixing them would have left the defect on the page while reporting it closed. Disabled fields stay distinguishable: f_items F5 reads them at #f4f4f4 on the same #8d8d8d border, so fill carries locked-vs-editable and the border does not move. BL-002 folded in, as that entry asks. All three outline:none sites in this sheet are gone: .field input/select/textarea:focus had a 3px --primary-light glow .user-pick:focus had the same glow .seq-step input.seq-label:focus had NO replacement at all #edf5ff against a #ffffff field is a 1.05:1 edge - a faint halo on the card and nothing at all on the field. Replaced with the ring console.css:69 and wp-chrome.css:206 already draw, so this is the app's existing idiom rather than a fourth one: 2px of --cds-focus, inset by -2px over the control's own edge. Verified with CDP focus emulation ON. Without it the headless page is not the focused document, :focus never matches, and every reading comes back as the unfocused style - which looks like a pass and is not one. It cost a wrong answer before I noticed, so it is worth saying. .user-pick and .seq-label also live on later wizard steps, which are display:none and cannot take focus, so the probe reveals the steps before measuring: .field input / select / textarea 2px solid #0f62fe offset -2px .user-pick 2px solid #0f62fe offset -2px .seq-label 2px solid #0f62fe offset -2px f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES. browser_check 71/71. Two findings outside this task's files, logged rather than fixed: BL-013, the creator's inputs have NO outline on focus and rely on the same 1.05:1 glow, which is BL-002's defect in the sheet next door and belongs to T7.2; and BL-014, four controls on the launcher and field view fall back to the UA default ring, which is visible but is a fourth idiom - T9.5 with C1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 9ab7b48de2 |
T3.2 - C3/S5: one source of truth for colour; page sheets alias only
theme-light.css is now the only file in html/ that contains a colour literal. The five page stylesheets and all four inline <style> blocks declare names and nothing else. theme-light.css 191 declarations, 175 with a literal value console.css 28 declarations, 0 work-package-suite-styles.css 16 declarations, 0 wp-chrome.css 14 declarations, 0 wp-creation-styles.css 24 declarations, 0 wp-sidenav.css 0 declarations, 0 #0f62fe is declared in one sheet, down from five. The eleven occurrences left inside theme-light.css are Carbon's own v10-to-v11 alias layer, which the inventory records as deliberate and not the S5 defect. Names were kept, because 111 var() references live in .js files across 23 token names and a rename there fails silently - no build error, no console warning, just an unstyled element. The rule the refactor was built on: consolidation is not unification. Where two sheets declared the same value, they collapse. Where they declared DIFFERENT values for one role - the two shadows, the eight status borders doing four jobs, the three mono stacks - each value got its own canonical name and the pair is recorded for T3.5. Picking a winner between two near-identical greys is a rendered change, which this task forbids. The console's zebra stripe is the one that would have bitten: #fafafa is six points from #f4f4f4, and merging them erases the striping on the nine-column user table. Collecting the one-offs in one place made two things countable that were not before: twelve distinct shadows, and a ninth amber (#8a6d00 on the field view, four points from #8e6a00 and doing the same job - BL-009). VERIFICATION - the screenshot done-when could not do the job, so it was replaced. Captured against wave 2, 11 of 14 shots were pixel-identical and 3 were not. Capturing wave 2 against ITSELF produced the same 3 differences at the same bounding box, so those shots cannot distinguish a regression from the clock. Trap 2 in the brief is half wrong: users.html is stable at both widths; the unstable third is the creator at 1440px, and admin's captured page height varies by ~600px between runs (BL-012). So tests/token_check.py was added. It checks what wave 3 actually claims: that every custom property resolves to the same literal, and every element computes the same colours, shadows and type. That is stronger than a screenshot - it covers the hover, focus and disabled rules a screenshot never exercises, and it is deterministic. wave 2 vs T3.2, all 7 pages: 178/178 wave-2 token names resolve identically, +213 new 3,500 elements compute identically, zero added, zero removed 16 tokens differ in notation only (#fff -> #ffffff), which is the duplicate class this task existed to collapse Two detours worth not repeating: the element walk was first keyed by sibling index and reported 55 phantom differences on the SOP page, where three JS-injected overlays append in whichever order their async work finishes (BL-011); and the comparator now normalises notation before reporting, because otherwise it fails on its own success. f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES as expected. browser_check 71/71. ONE DONE-WHEN NOT MET, recorded rather than skipped: "no page stylesheet declares a raw color, spacing or type value". The colour half is met in full. 483 raw spacing values, 281 font-sizes and 65 radii remain inside rules, 492 of them in the creator. That is arithmetic, not effort: the creator's spacing is every integer from 1px to 14px, so no token exists that padding:9px 11px maps to without changing one of the numbers - and this task forbids changing a rendered value. The two requirements are mutually exclusive. Logged as BL-010 for T5.x and T7.1, where those pages are re-laid-out and the values get chosen again. New backlog: BL-009 (ninth amber), BL-010 (raw spacing/type in rules), BL-011 (overlay append race), BL-012 (unstable screenshot targets). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 0e40e967a0 |
T3.1 - C3/S5: inventory the token systems, and correct the accent baseline
Produces docs/reference/tokens.md. No stylesheet is touched; T3.1 is inventory. What the inventory found that the plan did not say: - It is six stylesheets plus the launcher's inline <style>, not four (D1 again). 202 custom-property declarations, all listed with file and line. - The wave 0 accent baseline is wrong: 15 declarations across 5 sheets, not 14 across 4. console.css:13 packs five declarations onto one line and the baseline's `^\s*--` regex only ever matches the first, so console's own --accent was never counted. Corrected command is in tokens.md section 10. The wave 9 target of one sheet is unchanged; there is one more to remove. - Three mono stacks, not two. The file map recorded console.css dropping ui-monospace and Segoe UI Mono; wp-chrome.css:159,221 is a third stack that drops Cascadia Mono and Segoe UI Mono. - --shadow-lg does not differ by blur, as the file map says. Both are 0 4px 16px. The difference is the colour: rgba(0,0,0,.16) against rgba(20,30,50,.12). That means they can be unified later with no layout consequence at all. - Twelve var() fallbacks can never fire, because the token they fall back from is declared at :root on a sheet the page loads. Free deletions for T3.2. - --shadow: none is a no-op token with 8 consumers. Left for T3.3, which is hunting exactly this class of silent nothing. - 111 var() references live in .js files across 23 token names. A rename there fails silently - no build error, no console warning, just an unstyled element. Section 9 is the list to grep before deleting any alias. - There is a second brand blue: #2563d6, filling .sop-inherited at 7% alpha on every field a work package inherited from its SOP. Logged as BL-008. The document states one rule up front, because it is the difference between a clean wave 3 and a broken one: consolidation is not unification. Where two sheets declare the same value, T3.2 collapses them. Where they declare different values for the same role - the two banner greens, the three error borders, the two shadows - each value gets its own canonical name and the pair is recorded. Picking a winner between two near-identical greys is a visual change, which T3.2 forbids. Section 8 computes the near-duplicates rather than eyeballing them. The one to watch is the zebra stripe: console's #fafafa sits six points from #f4f4f4, and collapsing them erases the striping on the nine-column user table. New backlog entries: BL-004 (help.js ships 52 colours in a different design language), BL-005 (two modals styled entirely by inline style= attributes), BL-006 (17 half-pixel font sizes), BL-007 (--radius: 0 contradicted 45 times in the sheet that declares it), BL-008 (the second blue). One decision T3.2 needs and this task cannot make: adopting the superset mono stack changes the rendered face on machines that have Segoe UI Mono or ui-monospace but not IBM Plex Mono, which is most of the target environment. That is a real change on admin and users. Either accept it and re-shoot those two baselines - capturing twice, since they are not byte-stable - or keep console.css's narrower stack as a second token until T3.5. Written up in tokens.md section 6d and 8-H; built to neither until it is answered. Verification: f_items 5 FIXED / F6 REPRODUCES as expected, browser_check 71/71. Screenshots not applicable - this task changes no rendered surface. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 4d3258113a |
T1.4 - F4: the comments drawer opens below the header, not under it
Containing block first, as the task asks. The drawer is a body child with no
transformed ancestor, so its containing block was already the viewport - the
positioning context was never wrong. What was wrong was `top: 0` with
`height: 100vh`: the drawer started at the very top of the viewport, and the
creator's .header is sticky with z-index:100 against the drawer's 61. The
header won, so the drawer's own head - its title and its close button - was
roofed over and unreachable. It read as "off-screen" because the part you
needed was covered, not because the box had escaped the viewport.
That is why raising z-index would have been the wrong move: it does not remove
the collision, it just swaps which element is on top, and then the drawer
covers the header instead. The fix is to stop them occupying the same band.
The drawer now starts at var(--rail-top) and is that much shorter. --rail-top
is the header's measured height, set by wp-creation-app.js:1328 and already
used by .wp-nav for exactly this purpose, so "below the header" has one
definition on this page rather than two.
The iframe boundary is NOT implicated. position:fixed inside the embedded
creator resolves against the iframe's own viewport, which is self-consistent,
and the drawer behaves identically framed and unframed. T7.1 can dissolve the
boundary without revisiting this.
The probe was checking one width, one mode, and placement only. It now checks
390 and 1440, standalone and embedded, that the close button is genuinely
hit-testable via elementFromPoint rather than merely present, that the drawer
reopens after closing, and that opening it does not move the page's scroll
position. All pass.
One honest caveat, attributed rather than hidden. At 390px the drawer sits at
the right edge of a 485px layout viewport while the screen is 390px, so 95px of
it is off-screen. That is not the drawer: the creator forces its containing
block to 485px, and while chasing it I found BL-001's root cause -
wp-creation-app.js:1389 injects `body{--nav-w:288px}` with no media query,
which lands after wp-creation-styles.css:815's
`@media (max-width:860px){body{--nav-w:56px}}` and overrides it, so the page
reserves 288px of rail that is not there at any width. Every `right: 0` fixed
element on the page is displaced by it, not only this one.
Left unfixed on purpose - it is the creator's layout, T7.1 rebuilds it, and
CLAUDE.md is explicit about not fixing things noticed in passing. BL-001 now
carries the exact cause and the five rules that consume the token, so T7.1 does
not have to find it again. The probe reports it as an attributed note naming
BL-001, so nobody is sent to the wrong file.
browser_check 71/71. f_items: F1, F2, F3, F4 FIXED.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
| 440f3239a4 |
T1.2 - log the two backlog entries the commit message referenced
BL-001 updated: its 1440px half was resolved as a side effect of the F2 fix, not by intent. Left open, scoped to the creator at 390px, so T7.1 still checks it. BL-003 added: user-menu links are 16px tap targets. T1.2 made them reachable; it did not make them comfortable. Deferred to T2.2, which replaces the markup. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| c2e35b9261 |
T0.1 - build the file map and verify the plan's line references
Wave 0 exists because the plan's line numbers came from a review of users/directory-super-user rather than a fresh read. This is the fresh read: 7 pages, 6 stylesheets, 11,867 lines, with each page's stylesheets, scripts and iframe role recorded, and all seven baseline counts captured with the command that produced them. Four discrepancies, one of which matters a great deal: D2 - CLAUDE.md's "logged-override path for predecessors stays (A1). See wp-creation-app.js:1962-1972" cites the wrong function. That range is dashIssue(), which REFUSES to issue and says "open the package to release it early with a logged reason". The reviewer read that sentence and correctly inferred an override exists, but cited the mention rather than the code. The audited path is confirmEarlyRelease() at 967-984 plus seven satellites (state at 392, call sites at 998 and 1149, persisted at 1117, rendered at 1215, rehydrated at 1674, reset at 481/488/1744). A T7.3 that preserved only 1962-1972 would delete the business rule while believing it had protected it. D1 - "6 pages, 4 stylesheets" is 7 and 6; wave-0's own parenthetical lists seven names. Every "all 6 pages" done-when is off by one. D3 - four documents the plan reads from are deliverables not yet written. D4 - the creator overflows horizontally at 1440px, which no F item covers. Logged as BL-001 rather than fixed, since T7.1 rebuilds that layout anyway. BL-002 records that outline:none appears three times in the wizard sheet, not once, so T3.4 fixes all three. Counts confirmed against the review: 79 dialogs (43 in the creator), 12 div and 2 span onclick, 15 help-tip badges, 0 aria-live, 0 pushState. The "4 declarations of #0f62fe" needed a definition - there are 31 occurrences and 14 custom-property declarations; the 4 is the number of stylesheets declaring their own accent token, which is the number wave 9 should drive to 1. No application code changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 3d99d4b9d0 |
Import the R2 implementation spec into the repo
The plan was delivered as wp-suite-implementation-spec.zip and lived only in Downloads, so every "read CLAUDE.md first" instruction in it pointed at a file the repo did not have. Bring it in unchanged: CLAUDE.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, and docs/waves/wave-0 through wave-9 plus backlog.md. UX-REVIEW-2026-08-14.md is committed alongside it. It is the review that produced F1-F6, S1-S13 and the A/B/C assessments, and item IDs throughout the wave files cite it, so it belongs under version control rather than sitting untracked in the working tree. No application code changes here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
